The relationship between bilingual language use and executive functions

IF 16.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.1038/s44159-023-00178-9
Minna Lehtonen, Valantis Fyndanis, Jussi Jylkkä
{"title":"The relationship between bilingual language use and executive functions","authors":"Minna Lehtonen, Valantis Fyndanis, Jussi Jylkkä","doi":"10.1038/s44159-023-00178-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is continuing debate over whether bilingualism can confer advantages in other areas of cognition. Bilingual language behaviours, such as switching between languages, are often assumed to engage domain-general executive functions that control and regulate behaviour. According to this account, language switching might also improve executive functions used for nonverbal tasks. An alternative account suggests that bilingual language behaviours are skills that become automatic with practice and come to rely on task-specific processes instead of domain-general executive functions. According to this account, repeated training in bilingual language behaviours would not enhance executive functions generally. In this Review, we examine cross-sectional and longitudinal research on language switching and executive function in language users with and without cognitive deficits in order to compare the domain-generality and skill-learning accounts. We also discuss how these results converge with the findings of task specificity in the cognitive training literature suggesting that training does not generalize to other tasks. We hope to stimulate further research contrasting these two accounts, with the goal of a better understanding of the relationship between bilingualism and cognitive control and whether it is possible to train executive functions via bilingual language behaviours. Debate exists regarding whether using multiple languages confers cognitive advantages beyond the language domain. In this Review, Lehtonen and colleagues contrast domain-generality and skill-learning accounts of bilingualism, considering how bilingual language use interacts with executive functions across levels of language proficiency.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":"2 6","pages":"360-373"},"PeriodicalIF":16.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature reviews psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-023-00178-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is continuing debate over whether bilingualism can confer advantages in other areas of cognition. Bilingual language behaviours, such as switching between languages, are often assumed to engage domain-general executive functions that control and regulate behaviour. According to this account, language switching might also improve executive functions used for nonverbal tasks. An alternative account suggests that bilingual language behaviours are skills that become automatic with practice and come to rely on task-specific processes instead of domain-general executive functions. According to this account, repeated training in bilingual language behaviours would not enhance executive functions generally. In this Review, we examine cross-sectional and longitudinal research on language switching and executive function in language users with and without cognitive deficits in order to compare the domain-generality and skill-learning accounts. We also discuss how these results converge with the findings of task specificity in the cognitive training literature suggesting that training does not generalize to other tasks. We hope to stimulate further research contrasting these two accounts, with the goal of a better understanding of the relationship between bilingualism and cognitive control and whether it is possible to train executive functions via bilingual language behaviours. Debate exists regarding whether using multiple languages confers cognitive advantages beyond the language domain. In this Review, Lehtonen and colleagues contrast domain-generality and skill-learning accounts of bilingualism, considering how bilingual language use interacts with executive functions across levels of language proficiency.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双语语言使用与执行功能的关系
关于双语是否能在其他认知领域带来优势的争论仍在继续。人们通常认为,双语行为,如语言之间的转换,会调动控制和调节行为的领域一般执行功能。根据这种说法,语言转换也可能改善用于非语言任务的执行功能。另一种观点认为,双语语言行为是一种通过练习自动形成的技能,依赖于特定任务的过程,而不是一般领域的执行功能。根据这种观点,对双语语言行为的反复训练不会增强一般的执行功能。在这篇综述中,我们考察了对有认知缺陷和无认知缺陷的语言使用者的语言转换和执行功能的横向和纵向研究,以比较领域通用说和技能学习说。我们还讨论了这些结果如何与认知训练文献中关于任务特异性的研究结果趋于一致,后者表明训练并不能推广到其他任务。我们希望通过这两种观点的对比,激发进一步的研究,从而更好地理解双语与认知控制之间的关系,以及是否有可能通过双语语言行为来训练执行功能。关于使用多种语言是否会带来语言领域以外的认知优势,目前还存在争议。在这篇综述中,Lehtonen及其同事对比了二语习得的领域普遍性和技能学习说,探讨了二语使用如何与不同语言水平的执行功能相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the lab to a career in the video game industry Modelling game-theoretic predictions in social interactions Pre-stimulus neural activity and visual perception in schizophrenia Event perception and event memory in real-world experience Slow down and be critical before using early warning signals in psychopathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1