The Birth Control Debate: 1930s-1940s

IF 0.1 Theory in Action Pub Date : 2021-04-30 DOI:10.3798/TIA.1937-0237.2111
Shannon Mattice
{"title":"The Birth Control Debate: 1930s-1940s","authors":"Shannon Mattice","doi":"10.3798/TIA.1937-0237.2111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the 1930s and 1940s birth control became a part of a larger social problem that spanned across political and religious lines. Due to economic issues caused by the Great Depression, bringing children into the world was no longer a feasible dream for many families that already struggled with providing for themselves and any children they already had. The Comstock Laws prevented women from seeking out contraceptive methods to prevent unwanted pregnancies. Men, however, were encouraged during World War II to use contraceptives to prevent pregnancies. While white women were not being given choices on their own reproductive rights, women of color in the South were being forced into sterilization programs. These programs highlight the authority men had over women’s agency at the time. The role of the church at the time is also explored as the Protestant and the Catholic church had drastically different views on the use of birth control.","PeriodicalId":42347,"journal":{"name":"Theory in Action","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory in Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3798/TIA.1937-0237.2111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Throughout the 1930s and 1940s birth control became a part of a larger social problem that spanned across political and religious lines. Due to economic issues caused by the Great Depression, bringing children into the world was no longer a feasible dream for many families that already struggled with providing for themselves and any children they already had. The Comstock Laws prevented women from seeking out contraceptive methods to prevent unwanted pregnancies. Men, however, were encouraged during World War II to use contraceptives to prevent pregnancies. While white women were not being given choices on their own reproductive rights, women of color in the South were being forced into sterilization programs. These programs highlight the authority men had over women’s agency at the time. The role of the church at the time is also explored as the Protestant and the Catholic church had drastically different views on the use of birth control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计划生育之争:1930-1940年代
在整个20世纪30年代和40年代,节育成为一个跨越政治和宗教界限的更大社会问题的一部分。由于大萧条造成的经济问题,对于许多已经在为养活自己和现有孩子而苦苦挣扎的家庭来说,把孩子带到世界上不再是一个可行的梦想。《康斯托克法》禁止妇女寻求避孕方法以防止意外怀孕。然而,在第二次世界大战期间,人们鼓励男性使用避孕药具来预防怀孕。虽然白人女性在自己的生育权利上没有选择权,但南方有色人种女性却被迫接受绝育手术。这些项目突出了当时男性对女性机构的权威。由于新教徒和天主教会对节育的使用有着截然不同的看法,因此也探讨了教会在当时的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Theory in Action
Theory in Action SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Book Review: James Söderholm, Prince Hamlet. Lioness Writing Ltd. 2021. The Impact COVID had on Carceral Institutions in the United States Book Review: Steve Herbert, Too Easy to Keep: Life-Sentenced Prisoners and the Future of Mass Incarceration. First Edition. Oakland, CA: University of California Press. 2019. ISBN: 978- 0520300514 A Comparison of the Patient Wife in Boccaccio, Petrarch, Chaucer, and Lope Producing the Present through the Past: Adam Smith and the Inevitability of the Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1