Concordance of the Thai versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire and Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale for antenatal depression

Rapphon Sawaddisan, R. Ransing, Chonnakarn Jatchavala
{"title":"Concordance of the Thai versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire and Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale for antenatal depression","authors":"Rapphon Sawaddisan, R. Ransing, Chonnakarn Jatchavala","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.2023985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the Thai versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and examine the associated factors with the degree of concordance for assessing depression in pregnant Thai women. Material and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in November-December 2022. The Thai versions of both the PHQ-9 and EPDS were completed by pregnant women at the Antenatal Care Clinic, Songklanagarind Hospital, Thailand. Descriptive data analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed using The R Program to categorize “normal” and “increased risk of antenatal depression” and examine the statistical agreement, associated factors, and concordance between the two tools.Results: Of the 135 pregnant Thai women enrolled in the study, most lived in non-restive areas of southern Thailand (80.7%) with a mean age of 31.7 years. Most participants were found “normal” for antenatal depression screening by the Thai versions of both the PHQ-9 and the EPDS (89.6% and 88.9%, respectively). Complete concordance between the PHQ-9 and EPDS tests was found in 122 of the women, with 84.4% of all women found ‘normal’ and 5.9% found to have “increased risk of antenatal depression” with both questionnaires. The overall agreement between the 2 questionnaires was statistically significant (Kappa=0.4979, p-value<0.0001, Z=5.79). The statistical analysis identified no demographic factors associated with the concordance.Conclusion: The Thai versions of the PHQ-9 and the EPDS for antenatal depression screening had significantly moderate agreement. The statistical analysis found no factors associated with the concordance.","PeriodicalId":36211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2023985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the Thai versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and examine the associated factors with the degree of concordance for assessing depression in pregnant Thai women. Material and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in November-December 2022. The Thai versions of both the PHQ-9 and EPDS were completed by pregnant women at the Antenatal Care Clinic, Songklanagarind Hospital, Thailand. Descriptive data analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed using The R Program to categorize “normal” and “increased risk of antenatal depression” and examine the statistical agreement, associated factors, and concordance between the two tools.Results: Of the 135 pregnant Thai women enrolled in the study, most lived in non-restive areas of southern Thailand (80.7%) with a mean age of 31.7 years. Most participants were found “normal” for antenatal depression screening by the Thai versions of both the PHQ-9 and the EPDS (89.6% and 88.9%, respectively). Complete concordance between the PHQ-9 and EPDS tests was found in 122 of the women, with 84.4% of all women found ‘normal’ and 5.9% found to have “increased risk of antenatal depression” with both questionnaires. The overall agreement between the 2 questionnaires was statistically significant (Kappa=0.4979, p-value<0.0001, Z=5.79). The statistical analysis identified no demographic factors associated with the concordance.Conclusion: The Thai versions of the PHQ-9 and the EPDS for antenatal depression screening had significantly moderate agreement. The statistical analysis found no factors associated with the concordance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰文版患者健康问卷与爱丁堡产后抑郁量表对产前抑郁的一致性
目的:比较泰国版《患者健康问卷》(PHQ-9)和《爱丁堡产后抑郁量表》(EPDS)的一致性,探讨泰国孕妇抑郁评估的相关因素。材料和方法:这是一项横断面研究,于2022年11月至12月进行。泰国版本的PHQ-9和EPDS均由泰国Songklanagarind医院产前护理诊所的孕妇完成。使用R程序进行描述性数据分析和多变量逻辑回归,对“正常”和“产前抑郁风险增加”进行分类,并检查两种工具之间的统计一致性、相关因素和一致性。结果:在纳入研究的135名泰国孕妇中,大多数(80.7%)生活在泰国南部的非动荡地区,平均年龄为31.7岁。大多数参与者在泰国版PHQ-9和EPDS的产前抑郁筛查中被发现为“正常”(分别为89.6%和88.9%)。在122名女性中发现PHQ-9和EPDS测试完全一致,84.4%的女性在两份问卷中都发现“正常”,5.9%的女性发现“产前抑郁风险增加”。两份问卷的总体一致性有统计学意义(Kappa=0.4979, p值<0.0001,Z=5.79)。统计分析未发现与一致性相关的人口统计学因素。结论:泰国版本的PHQ-9和EPDS在产前抑郁症筛查中具有显著的中度一致性。统计分析未发现与一致性相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hospital Food Waste Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Effectiveness of a Patient-Family-Shared Care Program on Delaying the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study Association between Retinal Morphology and Visual Functions in Eyes with Typical Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration: A Pilot Study Association of Online Learning Tools and Students’ Health: A Case Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic Comparative Efficacy of Oxitard Capsules and Immusante Tablets in Early Stages of Oral Submucous Fibrosis - A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1