Unpacking the Mexican Federal Judiciary: An Inner Look at the Ethos of the Judicial Branch

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW Mexican Law Review Pub Date : 2018-06-21 DOI:10.22201/IIJ.24485306E.2018.1.12511
G. Ferreyra
{"title":"Unpacking the Mexican Federal Judiciary: An Inner Look at the Ethos of the Judicial Branch","authors":"G. Ferreyra","doi":"10.22201/IIJ.24485306E.2018.1.12511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on 45 interviews conducted in 6 different jurisdictions in Mexico, this article presents a close examination of the distinctive attributes and practices that characterize the Mexican Federal Judiciary (Poder Judicial Federal). Interviewees included typists, clerks and court clerks, judges, and justices, as well as scholars and experts with an in-depth knowledge of this institution. From an insider perspective, the article sheds light on idiosyncrasies, customs, and organizational patterns that are not well known outside the MFJ, such as its strong hierarchical structure, the nature of the work done, employee salaries, the practices of legalism, the risks of drug-related trials, and structural gender inequalities. It also discusses phenomena like influence peddling, cronyism, and nepotism, all of which are widely practiced within the MFJ but kept undisclosed. These practices do not necessarily have a negative connotation within the federal judiciary because they have become normalized due to their widespread use. In fact, the notion of corruption is somehow ambiguous for many judicial employees. Despite all this, the MFJ has become a more professionalized branch where the vast majority of employees performed their job competently and efficiently.","PeriodicalId":41684,"journal":{"name":"Mexican Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mexican Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/IIJ.24485306E.2018.1.12511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Based on 45 interviews conducted in 6 different jurisdictions in Mexico, this article presents a close examination of the distinctive attributes and practices that characterize the Mexican Federal Judiciary (Poder Judicial Federal). Interviewees included typists, clerks and court clerks, judges, and justices, as well as scholars and experts with an in-depth knowledge of this institution. From an insider perspective, the article sheds light on idiosyncrasies, customs, and organizational patterns that are not well known outside the MFJ, such as its strong hierarchical structure, the nature of the work done, employee salaries, the practices of legalism, the risks of drug-related trials, and structural gender inequalities. It also discusses phenomena like influence peddling, cronyism, and nepotism, all of which are widely practiced within the MFJ but kept undisclosed. These practices do not necessarily have a negative connotation within the federal judiciary because they have become normalized due to their widespread use. In fact, the notion of corruption is somehow ambiguous for many judicial employees. Despite all this, the MFJ has become a more professionalized branch where the vast majority of employees performed their job competently and efficiently.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭开墨西哥联邦司法机构的面纱:司法部门的道德观
基于在墨西哥6个不同司法管辖区进行的45次访谈,本文对墨西哥联邦司法机构(Poder Judicial Federal)的独特属性和实践进行了深入研究。受访者包括打字员、书记员和法院书记员、法官和法官,以及对这个机构有深入了解的学者和专家。从内部人士的角度来看,本文揭示了MFJ之外不为人所知的特质、习俗和组织模式,例如其强大的等级结构、所做工作的性质、员工工资、法律主义的做法、与药物相关的试验的风险以及结构性的性别不平等。它还讨论了诸如以权谋私、任人唯亲和裙带关系等现象,所有这些现象都在MFJ内部广泛存在,但没有公开。这些做法在联邦司法系统内并不一定具有负面含义,因为它们由于广泛使用而变得正常化。事实上,对于许多司法人员来说,腐败的概念在某种程度上是模糊的。尽管如此,MFJ已经成为一个更加专业化的分支机构,绝大多数员工都能胜任并高效地完成工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards an evidence-based pretrial risk assessment in Mexican juvenile offenders: A systematic review of relevant instruments using COSMIN guidelines review of the legal tax framework for digital platforms in Mexico Mexican State’s interpretation of indigenous self-determination in the age of democracy (1992-2022) influence of feminist mobilization on legal consciousness and the practices of femicide prosecutors in Mexico at the subnational level characteristics of Russian and Mexican environmental taxation systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1