Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties of Natural Postbiotics Derived from Five Lactic Acid Bacteria

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.5812/jjnpp-130785
S. M. A. Noori, A. Behfar, Afrooz Saadat, A. Ameri, Seyyed Shahab Atashi Yazdi, A. Siahpoosh
{"title":"Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties of Natural Postbiotics Derived from Five Lactic Acid Bacteria","authors":"S. M. A. Noori, A. Behfar, Afrooz Saadat, A. Ameri, Seyyed Shahab Atashi Yazdi, A. Siahpoosh","doi":"10.5812/jjnpp-130785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The application of natural antimicrobial and antioxidant agents in food and pharmaceutical products has recently become a trend due to the high demand for them from consumers. Postbiotics are bioactive compounds that are produced when the healthy bacteria in the gut ferment fiber. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial and antioxidant properties of postbiotics from 5 different lactic acid bacteria (LAB) including Lactiplantibacillus fermentum, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Lactiplantibacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus casei, and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Methods: Two different methods were adopted to obtain postbiotics (M1 and M2). M1 was the simple method in which the centrifugation was employed while in M2 method, ethyl acetate was used to obtain postbiotics. Agar disc diffusion, minimum inhibition concentration, and minimum bactericidal concentration were used to assess the antimicrobial activity of postbiotics. The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) test was performed in order for investigating the antioxidant property. Results: The best results were recorded for L. casei compared to other LABs. Highest values of the agar disc diffusion method were obtained for L. casei. The inhibition zones for Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus, for examples, were 22 mm, 20 mm, and 19 mm, respectively. The postbiotic of L. casei also exhibited the most potent antioxidant activity among other probiotic bacteria. The data showed that M2 was a more effective method than the other method for acquiring postbiotics. Conclusions: It was recommended LABs postbiotics should be applied as antioxidant, antimicrobial, and preservatives in food and pharmaceutical industries due to their desired effects and natural characteristics.","PeriodicalId":17745,"journal":{"name":"Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jjnpp-130785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The application of natural antimicrobial and antioxidant agents in food and pharmaceutical products has recently become a trend due to the high demand for them from consumers. Postbiotics are bioactive compounds that are produced when the healthy bacteria in the gut ferment fiber. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial and antioxidant properties of postbiotics from 5 different lactic acid bacteria (LAB) including Lactiplantibacillus fermentum, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Lactiplantibacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus casei, and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Methods: Two different methods were adopted to obtain postbiotics (M1 and M2). M1 was the simple method in which the centrifugation was employed while in M2 method, ethyl acetate was used to obtain postbiotics. Agar disc diffusion, minimum inhibition concentration, and minimum bactericidal concentration were used to assess the antimicrobial activity of postbiotics. The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) test was performed in order for investigating the antioxidant property. Results: The best results were recorded for L. casei compared to other LABs. Highest values of the agar disc diffusion method were obtained for L. casei. The inhibition zones for Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus, for examples, were 22 mm, 20 mm, and 19 mm, respectively. The postbiotic of L. casei also exhibited the most potent antioxidant activity among other probiotic bacteria. The data showed that M2 was a more effective method than the other method for acquiring postbiotics. Conclusions: It was recommended LABs postbiotics should be applied as antioxidant, antimicrobial, and preservatives in food and pharmaceutical industries due to their desired effects and natural characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从五种乳酸菌中提取的天然益生菌的抗菌和抗氧化性能
背景:由于消费者对天然抗菌剂和抗氧化剂的高需求,近年来天然抗菌剂和抗氧化剂在食品和药品中的应用已成为一种趋势。后益生菌是肠道中健康细菌发酵纤维时产生的生物活性化合物。目的:比较发酵乳杆菌、植物乳杆菌、鼠李糖乳杆菌、干酪乳杆菌和嗜酸乳杆菌5种不同乳酸菌(LAB)后生制剂的抑菌和抗氧化性能。方法:采用两种不同的方法获取后生制剂(M1和M2)。M1法采用离心分离法,M2法采用乙酸乙酯法获得后生制剂。采用琼脂盘扩散、最小抑菌浓度和最小杀菌浓度评价生后菌的抑菌活性。采用2,2-二苯基-1-吡啶酰肼(DPPH)试验研究了其抗氧化性能。结果:与其他实验室相比,干酪乳杆菌的效果最好。琼脂盘扩散法对干酪乳杆菌的影响最大。例如,对肠沙门氏菌、单核增生李斯特菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的抑制区分别为22 mm、20 mm和19 mm。在其他益生菌中,干酪乳杆菌的抗氧化活性最强。结果表明,M2比其他方法更有效地获得后生物。结论:实验室后生物制剂具有良好的抗氧化、抗菌和防腐作用,具有良好的天然特性,可广泛应用于食品和制药行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Antileishmania, Immune Modulation and Apoptosis Induction by Astragalus ecbatanus Extract Against Leishmania tropica Chemical Constituents of the Artemisia ciniformis Aerial Parts Grown in the Northeast of Iran and Their Chemotaxonomic Significance Evaluation of the Protective and Healing Effects of Heracleum lasiopetalum Boiss on a Modified Acetic Acid-Induced Ulcerative Colitis Model in Rats Unveiling Therapeutic Effects of Thymbra spicata L. on Cystic Echinococcosis In Vivo Wound-Healing and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Honey Produced by Melipona beecheii Bees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1