Meta-Analytic Evaluation of FRIENDS: A Rejoinder of

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Education and Treatment of Children Pub Date : 2019-02-28 DOI:10.1353/ETC.2019.0006
Daniel M. Maggin, Austin H. Johnson
{"title":"Meta-Analytic Evaluation of FRIENDS: A Rejoinder of","authors":"Daniel M. Maggin, Austin H. Johnson","doi":"10.1353/ETC.2019.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The following paper provides a response to the recent critique of our review of the FRIENDS For Life anxiety prevention and intervention program. In their critique, Barrett, Cooper, Stallard, Zeggio, & Gallegos-Guajardo (2017) expressed concerns on a range of conceptual, methodological, and interpretative issues. Our rejoinder addresses each of these points and reasserts our position that the primary concern with the studies was the use of the wrong unit of analysis when analyzing the data. Our response is contextualized in the importance of rigorous research as an essential component of evidence-based practice.","PeriodicalId":51493,"journal":{"name":"Education and Treatment of Children","volume":"42 1","pages":"129 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ETC.2019.0006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Treatment of Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ETC.2019.0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The following paper provides a response to the recent critique of our review of the FRIENDS For Life anxiety prevention and intervention program. In their critique, Barrett, Cooper, Stallard, Zeggio, & Gallegos-Guajardo (2017) expressed concerns on a range of conceptual, methodological, and interpretative issues. Our rejoinder addresses each of these points and reasserts our position that the primary concern with the studies was the use of the wrong unit of analysis when analyzing the data. Our response is contextualized in the importance of rigorous research as an essential component of evidence-based practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《老友记》的元分析评价
摘要:以下论文回应了我们最近对“一生的朋友”焦虑预防和干预计划的评论。Barrett、Cooper、Stallard、Zeggio和Gallegos Guajardo(2017)在他们的评论中表达了对一系列概念、方法和解释问题的担忧。我们的反驳针对了其中的每一点,并重申了我们的立场,即研究的主要问题是在分析数据时使用了错误的分析单位。我们的回应是基于严格研究作为循证实践的重要组成部分的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Education and Treatment of Children (ETC) is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning the development of services for children and youth who are at risk for or experiencing emotional or behavioral problems. A primary criterion for publication is that the material be of direct value to educators, parents, child care providers, or mental health professionals in improving the effectiveness of their services. Therefore, authors are required to compose their manuscripts in a clear, concise style that will be readily understood by the practitioners who are likely to make use of the information.
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness- and Relationship-Based Interventions: Which Break is Better for Improving Classroom Behavior? Enhancing Ci3T Professional Learning: Initial Lessons Learned from Ci3T Implementers A Systematic Review of Explicit Instruction and Frequency Building Interventions to Teach Students to Write The Daily Report Card and Check-in/Check-out: A Commentary About Two Siloed Interventions Training Behavior Analysts as Strategic Scientists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1