Philosophy of Religion through Two Lenses: Charles Hartshorne Reads Semen Frank

Q2 Arts and Humanities Roczniki Filozoficzne Pub Date : 2023-06-28 DOI:10.18290/rf237102.7
T. Obolevitch
{"title":"Philosophy of Religion through Two Lenses: Charles Hartshorne Reads Semen Frank","authors":"T. Obolevitch","doi":"10.18290/rf237102.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article contains a comparative analysis of the thought of Russian émigré philosopher Semen Frank and one of the most prominent representatives of process philosophy and theology Charles Hartshorne. Among the points of convergence, their integral vision of reality was pointed out. Frank’s and Hartshorne’s approaches to the question of cognition of God were considered, with special attention paid to their interpretation of the ontological proof. Hartshorne was familiar with Russian thought and even wrote reviews on Zenkovsky and Lossky’s classic books on the history of Russian philosophy, where he mentioned Frank more than once. One cannot speak of the two thinkers’ influence on each other, but rather of a common philosophical heritage going back to Plato.","PeriodicalId":35732,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Filozoficzne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Filozoficzne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18290/rf237102.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article contains a comparative analysis of the thought of Russian émigré philosopher Semen Frank and one of the most prominent representatives of process philosophy and theology Charles Hartshorne. Among the points of convergence, their integral vision of reality was pointed out. Frank’s and Hartshorne’s approaches to the question of cognition of God were considered, with special attention paid to their interpretation of the ontological proof. Hartshorne was familiar with Russian thought and even wrote reviews on Zenkovsky and Lossky’s classic books on the history of Russian philosophy, where he mentioned Frank more than once. One cannot speak of the two thinkers’ influence on each other, but rather of a common philosophical heritage going back to Plato.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从两个视角看宗教哲学——查尔斯·哈特肖恩解读《弗兰克》
本文对俄罗斯移民哲学家塞门·弗兰克与过程哲学和神学的杰出代表之一查尔斯·哈特肖恩的思想进行了比较分析。在趋同点中,指出了他们对现实的整体看法。弗兰克和哈特肖恩对上帝认知问题的研究方法受到了重视,特别是他们对本体论证明的解释。Hartshorne熟悉俄罗斯思想,甚至写过对Zenkovsky和Lossky关于俄罗斯哲学史的经典著作的评论,在那里他不止一次提到Frank。我们不能谈论这两位思想家对彼此的影响,而是可以追溯到柏拉图的共同哲学遗产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Roczniki Filozoficzne
Roczniki Filozoficzne Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Annals of Philosophy is one of the oldest philosophical journals in Poland (since 1948). It is published four times per year in both the online and traditional ways. The journal aims to publish the best original research papers in philosophy, as well as translations, reviews, accounts and polemics.
期刊最新文献
Realność wolnej woli Aristotle on the Real Object of Philia and Aretē Get Real! Editorial Introduction The Place of Naïve Realism in Russell’s Changing Accounts of Perception Putnam’s Natural Realism and Its Problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1