Spatial, temporal and technical variability in the diversity of prokaryotes and fungi in agricultural soils

IF 2.1 Q3 SOIL SCIENCE Frontiers in soil science Pub Date : 2022-08-04 DOI:10.3389/fsoil.2022.945888
T. Jeanne, Joël D’Astous-Pagé, R. Hogue
{"title":"Spatial, temporal and technical variability in the diversity of prokaryotes and fungi in agricultural soils","authors":"T. Jeanne, Joël D’Astous-Pagé, R. Hogue","doi":"10.3389/fsoil.2022.945888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies have shown that Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing can be used to measure the diversity of prokaryotes and fungal communities that provide ecosystem functions in agricultural soils. Pedoclimatic properties of soils, together with cropping systems and agricultural management practices, are major drivers of soil microbiome diversity. Their effects must be quantified and compared to technical variability to improve the relevance of observed effects and the indicators that may result from them. This study was conducted: 1) To assess the effects of three sources of technical variability on the soil prokaryotes and fungal diversity; 2) To identify a source of technical variability that can be used as a threshold to better assess crop management effects; 3) To evaluate the effects of spatial and temporal variability compare to a technical threshold in three crop management contexts, potato, corn/soybean and grassland. Technical variability was evaluated in a basis of sampling, soil DNA extraction and amplicon sequencing source of variability. Spatial variability was evaluated using composite bulk soil cores at four sampling points covering 2500 m² per field. Geolocated soils were also collected on three sampling dates during the growing season to evaluate temporal variability. A technical variability threshold was determined for the soil DNA extraction variability with a delta of Shannon index of 0.142 and 0.390 and a weighted UniFrac distance of 0.081 and 0.364 for prokaryotes and fungi, respectively. We observed that technical variability was consistently similar or lower than the spatial and temporal variabilities in each of the microbial communities. Observed variability was greater for the diversity of fungi and the crop system has a strong effect on temporal and spatial variability.","PeriodicalId":73107,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in soil science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in soil science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2022.945888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Several studies have shown that Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing can be used to measure the diversity of prokaryotes and fungal communities that provide ecosystem functions in agricultural soils. Pedoclimatic properties of soils, together with cropping systems and agricultural management practices, are major drivers of soil microbiome diversity. Their effects must be quantified and compared to technical variability to improve the relevance of observed effects and the indicators that may result from them. This study was conducted: 1) To assess the effects of three sources of technical variability on the soil prokaryotes and fungal diversity; 2) To identify a source of technical variability that can be used as a threshold to better assess crop management effects; 3) To evaluate the effects of spatial and temporal variability compare to a technical threshold in three crop management contexts, potato, corn/soybean and grassland. Technical variability was evaluated in a basis of sampling, soil DNA extraction and amplicon sequencing source of variability. Spatial variability was evaluated using composite bulk soil cores at four sampling points covering 2500 m² per field. Geolocated soils were also collected on three sampling dates during the growing season to evaluate temporal variability. A technical variability threshold was determined for the soil DNA extraction variability with a delta of Shannon index of 0.142 and 0.390 and a weighted UniFrac distance of 0.081 and 0.364 for prokaryotes and fungi, respectively. We observed that technical variability was consistently similar or lower than the spatial and temporal variabilities in each of the microbial communities. Observed variability was greater for the diversity of fungi and the crop system has a strong effect on temporal and spatial variability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业土壤原核生物和真菌多样性的空间、时间和技术变异
几项研究表明,Illumina MiSeq高通量测序可用于测量农业土壤中提供生态系统功能的原核生物和真菌群落的多样性。土壤的土壤生态特性,以及种植制度和农业管理实践,是土壤微生物组多样性的主要驱动因素。必须对其影响进行量化,并将其与技术变异性进行比较,以提高观察到的影响及其可能产生的指标的相关性。本研究进行了:1)评估三种技术变异源对土壤原核生物和真菌多样性的影响;2) 确定技术变异的来源,可作为更好地评估作物管理效果的阈值;3) 在马铃薯、玉米/大豆和草地三种作物管理背景下,与技术阈值相比,评估空间和时间变异性的影响。在采样、土壤DNA提取和扩增子测序变异来源的基础上,对技术变异性进行了评估。使用复合大块土芯在四个采样点评估了空间变异性,每个采样点覆盖2500 m²。在生长季节的三个采样日期,还收集了地理定位土壤,以评估时间变异性。确定了土壤DNA提取变异性的技术变异性阈值,原核生物和真菌的香农德尔塔指数分别为0.142和0.390,加权UniFrac距离分别为0.081和0.364。我们观察到,在每个微生物群落中,技术变异性始终与空间和时间变异性相似或更低。真菌多样性的观测变异性较大,作物系统对时间和空间变异性有很大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Groundwater fluoride prediction modeling using physicochemical parameters in Punjab, India: a machine-learning approach Soil ecology, food systems, and organic waste: the critical network nobody is talking about Long-term fertilization and liming increase soil fertility but reduce carbon stratification and stocks of paddy rice soils Effects of local farming practices on soil organic carbon content, enzymatic activities, and microbial community structure in semi-arid soils of Morocco Rice straw incorporation and Azolla application improves agronomic nitrogen-use-efficiency and rice grain yields in paddy fields
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1