Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of conventional white light endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging for intestinal-type gastric adenoma in benign lesions

La-Mei Teng, Qing-Wei Zhang, Xintian Zhang, Jin-Nan Chen, Jing Zhou
{"title":"Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of conventional white light endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging for intestinal-type gastric adenoma in benign lesions","authors":"La-Mei Teng, Qing-Wei Zhang, Xintian Zhang, Jin-Nan Chen, Jing Zhou","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of white light endoscopy (WLE) and magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) for intestinal-type gastric adenoma in benign lesions. \n \n \nMethods \nData of patients with suspected early gastric neoplastic lesions diagnosed with WLE were collected from Shanghai Renji Hospital from January 2016 to December 2017. Patients with suspected early gastric neoplastic lesions by WLE were examined with WLE, ME-NBI and targeted biopsy again within 2 weeks. The results of WLE, ME-NBI and biopsy were recorded. Using pathological diagnosis as the golden standard, diagnostic efficacy of WLE and ME-NBI for intestinal-type gastric adenoma and other non-adenoma lesions was evaluated. \n \n \nResults \nA total of 232 patients (232 lesions) were included, i. e., 124 intestinal-type gastric adenoma and 108 other non-adenoma lesions such as atrophy, ulcers, hyperplasia, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, etc.. The sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy of ME-NBI in intestinal-type gastric adenoma were higher than those of WLE (92.7% VS 71.8%, 91.6% VS 73.7%, 91.8% VS 80.6%, all P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nDiagnostic efficacy of ME-NBI in intestinal-type gastric adenoma from other non-adenoma lesions is significantly higher than that of WLE. \n \n \nKey words: \nAdenoma; Stomach neoplasm; Endoscopy, gastrointestinal; Narrow-band imaging","PeriodicalId":10072,"journal":{"name":"中华消化内镜杂志","volume":"36 1","pages":"558-562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化内镜杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.08.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To compare the diagnostic accuracy of white light endoscopy (WLE) and magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) for intestinal-type gastric adenoma in benign lesions. Methods Data of patients with suspected early gastric neoplastic lesions diagnosed with WLE were collected from Shanghai Renji Hospital from January 2016 to December 2017. Patients with suspected early gastric neoplastic lesions by WLE were examined with WLE, ME-NBI and targeted biopsy again within 2 weeks. The results of WLE, ME-NBI and biopsy were recorded. Using pathological diagnosis as the golden standard, diagnostic efficacy of WLE and ME-NBI for intestinal-type gastric adenoma and other non-adenoma lesions was evaluated. Results A total of 232 patients (232 lesions) were included, i. e., 124 intestinal-type gastric adenoma and 108 other non-adenoma lesions such as atrophy, ulcers, hyperplasia, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, etc.. The sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy of ME-NBI in intestinal-type gastric adenoma were higher than those of WLE (92.7% VS 71.8%, 91.6% VS 73.7%, 91.8% VS 80.6%, all P 0.05). Conclusion Diagnostic efficacy of ME-NBI in intestinal-type gastric adenoma from other non-adenoma lesions is significantly higher than that of WLE. Key words: Adenoma; Stomach neoplasm; Endoscopy, gastrointestinal; Narrow-band imaging
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规白光内镜与放大内镜结合窄带成像对肠型胃腺瘤良性病变诊断效果的比较
目的比较白光内镜(WLE)与放大内镜联合窄带成像(ME-NBI)对肠型胃腺瘤良性病变的诊断准确性。方法收集2016年1月至2017年12月在上海仁济医院诊断为WLE的疑似早期胃肿瘤患者资料。WLE怀疑早期胃肿瘤病变的患者在2周内再次行WLE、ME-NBI及靶向活检检查。记录WLE、ME-NBI及活检结果。以病理诊断为金标准,评价WLE和ME-NBI对肠型胃腺瘤及其他非腺瘤病变的诊断效果。结果共纳入232例患者(232个病变),即肠型胃腺瘤124例,其他非腺瘤病变如萎缩、溃疡、增生、低级别上皮内瘤变等108例。ME-NBI对肠型胃腺瘤的敏感性、阴性预测值和准确性均高于WLE (92.7% VS 71.8%、91.6% VS 73.7%、91.8% VS 80.6%, P均为0.05)。结论ME-NBI对肠型胃腺瘤其他非腺瘤病变的诊断效果明显高于WLE。关键词:腺瘤;胃肿瘤;胃肠道内窥镜检查;窄带成像技术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7555
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy is a high-level medical academic journal specializing in digestive endoscopy, which was renamed Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy in August 1996 from Endoscopy. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy mainly reports the leading scientific research results of esophagoscopy, gastroscopy, duodenoscopy, choledochoscopy, laparoscopy, colorectoscopy, small enteroscopy, sigmoidoscopy, etc. and the progress of their equipments and technologies at home and abroad, as well as the clinical diagnosis and treatment experience. The main columns are: treatises, abstracts of treatises, clinical reports, technical exchanges, special case reports and endoscopic complications. The target readers are digestive system diseases and digestive endoscopy workers who are engaged in medical treatment, teaching and scientific research. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy has been indexed by ISTIC, PKU, CSAD, WPRIM.
期刊最新文献
Risk assessment of cirrhosis patients with esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding by three scoring systems Effects of peroral endoscopic myotomy on esophageal motility in patients with achalasia Efficacy of hemostatic powder on preventing delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial Comparison of long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery on treatment of early esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma Clinical, endoscopic and pathological features of early Barrett esophageal adenocarcinoma and its treatment efficacy by endoscopic submucosal dissection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1