Modelos de avaliação em saúde mental: entre fatores de risco e fatores de proteção

G. Valente, E. Cortez, Carlos Sequeira
{"title":"Modelos de avaliação em saúde mental: entre fatores de risco e fatores de proteção","authors":"G. Valente, E. Cortez, Carlos Sequeira","doi":"10.11144/JAVERIANA.IE20-2.MASM","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To identify and analyze existing models of evaluation of risk factors and protective factors related to mental health. Method: An systematic review of the literature survey, conducted in: Medline, Lilacs and Pubmed. Results: 119 potential studies were selected by extracting 63 instruments that met the inclusion criteria, leaving 27 instruments available online for free access. Conclusion: It is noted that it was not always possible to obtain the original instrument available, which composes a limitation to the study. Thus, caution is recommended when comparing the individual characteristics of the instruments and it is recommended that a specific instrument is designed to assess the mental health of many human groups.","PeriodicalId":31363,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion en Enfermeria Imagen y Desarrollo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion en Enfermeria Imagen y Desarrollo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11144/JAVERIANA.IE20-2.MASM","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify and analyze existing models of evaluation of risk factors and protective factors related to mental health. Method: An systematic review of the literature survey, conducted in: Medline, Lilacs and Pubmed. Results: 119 potential studies were selected by extracting 63 instruments that met the inclusion criteria, leaving 27 instruments available online for free access. Conclusion: It is noted that it was not always possible to obtain the original instrument available, which composes a limitation to the study. Thus, caution is recommended when comparing the individual characteristics of the instruments and it is recommended that a specific instrument is designed to assess the mental health of many human groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理健康评估模型:风险因素与保护因素之间的关系
目的:识别和分析与心理健康相关的危险因素和保护因素的现有评估模型。方法:系统回顾Medline、Lilacs和Pubmed上的文献调查。结果:通过提取符合纳入标准的63种仪器,筛选出119项潜在研究,剩余27种仪器可在线免费获取。结论:值得注意的是,并非总能获得可用的原始仪器,这构成了研究的局限性。因此,建议在比较这些工具的个别特征时要谨慎,并建议设计一种特定的工具来评估许多人类群体的心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Entorno laboral de enfermería en un hospital de Bogotá, 2022 Experiencia del síntoma en el Síndrome Coronario Agudo: comprobación de un modelo conceptual Percepción de la simulación clínica como experiencia de aprendizaje en estudiantes de Licenciatura en Enfermería Ações de educação interprofissional desenvolvidas no contexto dos cursos de graduação em saúde Validación de la Escala de Valoración de Agencia de Autocuidado Revisada en una muestra colombiana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1