Rethinking Shortages in Special Education: Making Good on the Promise of an Equal Opportunity for Students With Disabilities

IF 1.9 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teacher Education and Special Education Pub Date : 2020-02-01 DOI:10.1177/0888406419880352
Loretta Mason-Williams, Elizabeth F. Bettini, David J. Peyton, A. Harvey, M. Rosenberg, P. Sindelar
{"title":"Rethinking Shortages in Special Education: Making Good on the Promise of an Equal Opportunity for Students With Disabilities","authors":"Loretta Mason-Williams, Elizabeth F. Bettini, David J. Peyton, A. Harvey, M. Rosenberg, P. Sindelar","doi":"10.1177/0888406419880352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the authors describe the complexity of special education teacher (SET) shortage, how shortage undermines equal educational opportunity, and strategies that school districts and state and federal governments have used to combat them. The authors consider the economic consequences of shortage and describe how school budgets are burdened by turnover and, in some cases, litigation. The authors consider specific aspects of SET shortages, including the problems of staffing high-poverty urban and rural schools, recruiting and retaining teachers of color, and staffing alternative educational placements. The authors then consider more general factors related to shortage, including the valence of teaching as a profession, attrition, working conditions, and compensation. The authors describe how broad policy-based interventions, such as federal spending on personnel preparation and alternative route entrées to teaching, have largely failed to remedy SET shortage. Finally, the authors posit that SET shortage cannot be addressed successfully without improving working conditions and differentiating compensation for shortage area teachers and teachers working with struggling students. Although special education cannot achieve such sweeping change alone, the time seems ripe for moving forward on this important agenda.","PeriodicalId":51596,"journal":{"name":"Teacher Education and Special Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0888406419880352","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teacher Education and Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419880352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

In this article, the authors describe the complexity of special education teacher (SET) shortage, how shortage undermines equal educational opportunity, and strategies that school districts and state and federal governments have used to combat them. The authors consider the economic consequences of shortage and describe how school budgets are burdened by turnover and, in some cases, litigation. The authors consider specific aspects of SET shortages, including the problems of staffing high-poverty urban and rural schools, recruiting and retaining teachers of color, and staffing alternative educational placements. The authors then consider more general factors related to shortage, including the valence of teaching as a profession, attrition, working conditions, and compensation. The authors describe how broad policy-based interventions, such as federal spending on personnel preparation and alternative route entrées to teaching, have largely failed to remedy SET shortage. Finally, the authors posit that SET shortage cannot be addressed successfully without improving working conditions and differentiating compensation for shortage area teachers and teachers working with struggling students. Although special education cannot achieve such sweeping change alone, the time seems ripe for moving forward on this important agenda.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反思特殊教育的不足:实现残疾学生机会均等的承诺
在这篇文章中,作者描述了特殊教育教师短缺的复杂性,短缺如何破坏平等的教育机会,以及学区、州和联邦政府用来应对这些问题的策略。作者考虑了短缺的经济后果,并描述了学校预算是如何因人员流动以及在某些情况下的诉讼而负担的。作者考虑了SET短缺的具体方面,包括为高贫困城市和农村学校配备人员、招聘和留住有色人种教师以及为替代教育安置配备人员的问题。然后,作者考虑了与短缺相关的更普遍的因素,包括教学作为一种职业的价值、自然减员、工作条件和薪酬。作者描述了广泛的基于政策的干预措施,如联邦在人员准备和替代教学途径上的支出,在很大程度上未能弥补SET短缺。最后,作者认为,如果不改善工作条件,不区分短缺地区教师和与困难学生一起工作的教师的薪酬,就无法成功解决SET短缺问题。尽管特殊教育无法单独实现如此全面的变革,但推进这一重要议程的时机似乎已经成熟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teacher Education and Special Education
Teacher Education and Special Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Setting the Stage for a New Prologue Effects of Online Tiered Training to Increase Teachers’ Use of Positive Behavior Supports Supporting Paraeducators and their Use of Active Supervision at Recess: An Exploratory Study Assessing the Performance of Teachers of Students With Significant Disabilities: Establishing Content Validity for the TRAIT-SD Special Educators’ Training and Preparedness to Write Individualized Education Programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1