Image Quality of Coronary CT Angiography (CCTA) using 640-slice Scanner: Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Coronary Arteries Visibility

S. Shamsul, A. Sabarudin, H. Abdul Hamid, N. Abu Bakar, M. Oteh, Muhammad Khalis Abdul Karim
{"title":"Image Quality of Coronary CT Angiography (CCTA) using 640-slice Scanner: Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Coronary Arteries Visibility","authors":"S. Shamsul, A. Sabarudin, H. Abdul Hamid, N. Abu Bakar, M. Oteh, Muhammad Khalis Abdul Karim","doi":"10.17576/jskm-2020-1802-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) using 640-slice scanner. Advancement of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) technology with higher spatial, temporal resolution, and increasing detector array have improved the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of CCTA. A total of 25 patients (12 men and 13 women) underwent CCTA was chosen and data was acquired by 640-slice scanner. All 16 segments of coronary arteries were evaluated by two reviewers using a 4-likert scale for qualitative assessment. In quantitative assessment, the evaluation of 4 main coronary arteries were analysed in terms of signal intensity (SI), image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). All 25 patients with a mean age of 52.88 ± 14.75 years old and body mass index (BMI) of 24.24 ± 3.28 kg/m 2 were analysed. In qualitative assessment, from the total of 400 segments, 379 segments (95 %) have diagnostic value while 21 segments do not have diagnostic value, which means 5 % artefact was detected. In quantitative assessment, there was no statistical differences in gender, race, and BMI ( p >0.05). Overall evaluation showed that higher SI at the left main artery (LM) at 393.7 ± 47.19. Image noise was higher at right coronary artery (RCA) at 39.01 ± 13.97. SNR and CNR showed higher at left anterior descending (LAD) with 12.73 ± 5.17 and LM 9.14 ± 4.2, respectively. In conclusion, this study indicates that 640-slice MDCT has higher diagnostic value in CCTA examination with 95 % vessel visibility with 5 % artefact detection. Keywords: CCTA, 640-slice scanner, coronary arteries, MDCT DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/jskm-2020-1802-06","PeriodicalId":17686,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/jskm-2020-1802-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) using 640-slice scanner. Advancement of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) technology with higher spatial, temporal resolution, and increasing detector array have improved the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of CCTA. A total of 25 patients (12 men and 13 women) underwent CCTA was chosen and data was acquired by 640-slice scanner. All 16 segments of coronary arteries were evaluated by two reviewers using a 4-likert scale for qualitative assessment. In quantitative assessment, the evaluation of 4 main coronary arteries were analysed in terms of signal intensity (SI), image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). All 25 patients with a mean age of 52.88 ± 14.75 years old and body mass index (BMI) of 24.24 ± 3.28 kg/m 2 were analysed. In qualitative assessment, from the total of 400 segments, 379 segments (95 %) have diagnostic value while 21 segments do not have diagnostic value, which means 5 % artefact was detected. In quantitative assessment, there was no statistical differences in gender, race, and BMI ( p >0.05). Overall evaluation showed that higher SI at the left main artery (LM) at 393.7 ± 47.19. Image noise was higher at right coronary artery (RCA) at 39.01 ± 13.97. SNR and CNR showed higher at left anterior descending (LAD) with 12.73 ± 5.17 and LM 9.14 ± 4.2, respectively. In conclusion, this study indicates that 640-slice MDCT has higher diagnostic value in CCTA examination with 95 % vessel visibility with 5 % artefact detection. Keywords: CCTA, 640-slice scanner, coronary arteries, MDCT DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/jskm-2020-1802-06
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)的图像质量:冠状动脉可见性的定性和定量评估
本研究的目的是评估使用640层扫描仪进行冠状动脉计算机断层摄影血管造影术(CCTA)的图像质量和诊断准确性。多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)技术的进步,具有更高的空间、时间分辨率和不断增加的探测器阵列,提高了CCTA的图像质量和诊断准确性。共选择25名患者(12名男性和13名女性)接受CCTA,并通过640切片扫描仪获取数据。两名评审员使用4-likert量表对所有16段冠状动脉进行了定性评估。在定量评估中,根据信号强度(SI)、图像噪声、信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)对4条主要冠状动脉的评估进行了分析。对25例平均年龄52.88±14.75岁、体重指数24.24±3.28kg/m2的患者进行了分析。在定性评估中,在总共400个节段中,379个节段(95%)具有诊断价值,而21个节段没有诊断价值,这意味着检测到5%的伪影。在定量评估中,性别、种族和BMI没有统计学差异(p>0.05)。总体评估显示,左主干(LM)的SI较高,为393.7±47.19。右冠状动脉图像噪声较高,为39.01±13.97。左前降支的SNR和CNR分别为12.73±5.17和9.14±4.2。总之,本研究表明,640层MDCT在CCTA检查中具有更高的诊断价值,95%的血管可见性和5%的伪影检测。关键词:CCTA,640切片扫描仪,冠状动脉,MDCT DOI:https://doi.org/10.17576/jskm-2020-1802-06
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Jujube in Malay Medical Manuscript: A comparison from Scientific and Islamic Perspectives Impact of a Tailored Self-Management Education Programme for Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis in a Multi-Ethnic Country THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE INTENSITY OF INSTAGRAM USAGE AND ORTHOREXIA NERVOSA IN UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA STUDENTS The electroacoustic performance of digital noise reduction systems in commercial hearing aids with Malay speech-plus-noise test signals THE BENEFIT OF GARLIC FROM ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVE AND MALAY PRACTISE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1