Productive Citationality and Gendered renegotiations in the Rime of Francesco Petrarca and Gaspara Stampa

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE ROMANCE NOTES Pub Date : 2022-07-15 DOI:10.1353/rmc.2022.0013
A. Hicks-Bartlett
{"title":"Productive Citationality and Gendered renegotiations in the Rime of Francesco Petrarca and Gaspara Stampa","authors":"A. Hicks-Bartlett","doi":"10.1353/rmc.2022.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Beginning with Judith Butler’s discussions of authority and citational practice, this paper examines authorial subjectival positions, notions regarding originality and creation, and the use of citationality in the poems of Francesco Petrarca and Gaspara Stampa. Fundamental to the poetic investments of each are discussions of loss, possession, gender, and conception, with conception being represented both artistically and literally. Whereas Petrarch is frequently regarded by critics as an “originator” while his many borrowings from the classical and troubadour traditions are minimized, Stampa has often been historically—and erroneously—cast as an imitator who produces derivative poetry. Yet, not only are Stampa’s citational methods highly innovative, they are specifically managed to allow her to critique and supplant the Petrarchan model, by privileging her own text and the female body.","PeriodicalId":42940,"journal":{"name":"ROMANCE NOTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ROMANCE NOTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rmc.2022.0013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Beginning with Judith Butler’s discussions of authority and citational practice, this paper examines authorial subjectival positions, notions regarding originality and creation, and the use of citationality in the poems of Francesco Petrarca and Gaspara Stampa. Fundamental to the poetic investments of each are discussions of loss, possession, gender, and conception, with conception being represented both artistically and literally. Whereas Petrarch is frequently regarded by critics as an “originator” while his many borrowings from the classical and troubadour traditions are minimized, Stampa has often been historically—and erroneously—cast as an imitator who produces derivative poetry. Yet, not only are Stampa’s citational methods highly innovative, they are specifically managed to allow her to critique and supplant the Petrarchan model, by privileging her own text and the female body.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弗朗切斯科·佩特拉尔卡和加斯帕拉·斯坦帕之争中的生产性引文与性别重新谈判
摘要:本文从朱迪斯·巴特勒对权威和引用实践的论述入手,考察了作者的主体地位、关于独创性和创造性的观念,以及引用在弗朗西斯科·佩特拉尔卡和加斯帕拉·斯坦帕诗歌中的使用。每一种诗歌投资的基础都是对损失、占有、性别和概念的讨论,概念既有艺术表现,也有字面表现。佩特拉克经常被评论家视为“鼻祖”,而他对古典和游吟诗人传统的许多借鉴却被最小化,而斯坦帕在历史上经常被错误地塑造成一个创作衍生诗歌的模仿者。然而,斯坦帕的引用方法不仅具有高度的创新性,而且还通过赋予自己的文本和女性身体特权,使她能够批判和取代佩特拉坎模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ROMANCE NOTES
ROMANCE NOTES LITERATURE, ROMANCE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Poesía y corrupción virreinal: un soneto de Juan del Valle y Caviedes contra el duque de la Plata Sátira y política en el ciclo de pliegos de don Guindo y doña Guinda (1700–1707) Un paradigma compositivo en la poesía de sátira política y clandestina áurea: el soneto dialogado Quevedo "redivivo" en una sátira política inédita a favor de Juan José de Austria Dos minicomedias parateatrales burlescas y satíricas inéditas: La toma y cerco de Túnez y Pérdida de la goleta y la gran conquista de Argel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1