Utopias of the past: a reading of A. K. Forbes’ Ras Mala

IF 0.3 0 ASIAN STUDIES South Asian History and Culture Pub Date : 2022-11-17 DOI:10.1080/19472498.2022.2146634
D. K. Chotai
{"title":"Utopias of the past: a reading of A. K. Forbes’ Ras Mala","authors":"D. K. Chotai","doi":"10.1080/19472498.2022.2146634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Alexander Kinloch Forbes, a British colonial official, wrote the Ras Mala, a history of Gujarat, in 1856. When he was looking for sources for writing this history, he received a response from his interlocutors in Gujarat that itihasa resides in the volumes of kavya. The essay attempts to understand this response, and study the shared genealogies of history and poetry in the context of nineteenth century Gujarat. It argues that the shared genealogies of itihasa and kavya in Gujarati discursive traditions sustained a plural vision of the past. This plural vision stood at variance from the one that was projected through the European teleological project of history in the nineteenth century Enlightenment philosophy and the Kantian model of education. The essay proposes to read Forbes’ Ras Mala in the light of the shared genealogy of itihasa and kavya to understand how it both contests and collaborates with the dominant European modes of constructing the past. In the light of Ashish Nandy’s concept of the open past, the paper seeks to understand what visions of utopias Ras Mala had to offer on the site of colonial modernity.","PeriodicalId":43902,"journal":{"name":"South Asian History and Culture","volume":"14 1","pages":"437 - 449"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian History and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2022.2146634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Alexander Kinloch Forbes, a British colonial official, wrote the Ras Mala, a history of Gujarat, in 1856. When he was looking for sources for writing this history, he received a response from his interlocutors in Gujarat that itihasa resides in the volumes of kavya. The essay attempts to understand this response, and study the shared genealogies of history and poetry in the context of nineteenth century Gujarat. It argues that the shared genealogies of itihasa and kavya in Gujarati discursive traditions sustained a plural vision of the past. This plural vision stood at variance from the one that was projected through the European teleological project of history in the nineteenth century Enlightenment philosophy and the Kantian model of education. The essay proposes to read Forbes’ Ras Mala in the light of the shared genealogy of itihasa and kavya to understand how it both contests and collaborates with the dominant European modes of constructing the past. In the light of Ashish Nandy’s concept of the open past, the paper seeks to understand what visions of utopias Ras Mala had to offer on the site of colonial modernity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过去的乌托邦:读a.K.福布斯的《拉斯马拉》
摘要:1856年,英国殖民地官员亚历山大·金洛克·福布斯撰写了古吉拉特邦历史书《拉斯马拉》。当他寻找书写这段历史的来源时,他从古吉拉特邦的对话者那里得到了回应,称itihasa存在于《卡夫亚》的卷中。本文试图理解这种反应,并在19世纪古吉拉特邦的背景下研究历史和诗歌的共同谱系。它认为,古吉拉特邦话语传统中itihasa和kavya的共同家谱维持了对过去的多元愿景。这种多元视野与19世纪启蒙哲学和康德教育模式中欧洲历史目的论项目所投射的视野不同。本文建议根据itihasa和kavya的共同谱系来阅读《福布斯》的Ras Mala,以了解它是如何与欧洲主导的构建过去的模式竞争和合作的。本文从阿希什·南迪关于开放的过去的概念出发,试图理解拉斯马拉乌托邦在殖民地现代性的舞台上所提供的愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Rhythm, noise and action: decoding R.D. Burman’s soundtracks of Bombay cinema Miraji ke Liye: interview with Julien Columeau Agnes Smedley and the Indian anarchists in Weimar Berlin Miraji and South Asian aesthetics, poetics, and politics A dense tranquillity, a harsh solitude: the ‘un-natural’ modernism of Miraji
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1