SYSTEMATIC SELECTION OF BLOCKCHAIN PLATFORMS USING FUZZY AHP-TOPSIS

IF 1.2 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Malaysian Journal of Computer Science Pub Date : 2023-04-30 DOI:10.22452/mjcs.vol36no2.1
Yin Kia Chiam (Corresponding Author), Shahr Banoo Muradi
{"title":"SYSTEMATIC SELECTION OF BLOCKCHAIN PLATFORMS USING FUZZY AHP-TOPSIS","authors":"Yin Kia Chiam (Corresponding Author), Shahr Banoo Muradi","doi":"10.22452/mjcs.vol36no2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various businesses and industries such as financial, medical care management, supply chain management, data management, Internet of Things (IoT) and government supremacy, have been using blockchain technology to develop systems. During the selection of blockchain platforms, many criteria need to be taken into account depending on the organization, project and use case requirements. This study proposes a systematic selection method based on the Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach which compares and selects alternative blockchain platforms against a set of selection criteria that cover both features and non-functional properties. A case study was conducted to evaluate the applicability of the proposed selection method. The proposed selection method which consists of three main stages was applied for the comparison and selection of the most appropriate blockchain platform for two projects. In the case study, three blockchain platforms were selected and ranked for each project based on selection criteria derived from the project requirements. Both project representatives showed strong agreement with the applicability aspects of the proposed selection method. It is concluded that the proposed selection criteria and selection method can be applied practically to support the decision-makers in blockchain platform selection for real-world projects.","PeriodicalId":49894,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Computer Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/mjcs.vol36no2.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various businesses and industries such as financial, medical care management, supply chain management, data management, Internet of Things (IoT) and government supremacy, have been using blockchain technology to develop systems. During the selection of blockchain platforms, many criteria need to be taken into account depending on the organization, project and use case requirements. This study proposes a systematic selection method based on the Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach which compares and selects alternative blockchain platforms against a set of selection criteria that cover both features and non-functional properties. A case study was conducted to evaluate the applicability of the proposed selection method. The proposed selection method which consists of three main stages was applied for the comparison and selection of the most appropriate blockchain platform for two projects. In the case study, three blockchain platforms were selected and ranked for each project based on selection criteria derived from the project requirements. Both project representatives showed strong agreement with the applicability aspects of the proposed selection method. It is concluded that the proposed selection criteria and selection method can be applied practically to support the decision-makers in blockchain platform selection for real-world projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用模糊层次分析法对区块链平台进行系统选择
金融、医疗管理、供应链管理、数据管理、物联网(IoT)、政府至上等各种企业和行业一直在使用区块链技术开发系统。在选择区块链平台期间,需要根据组织、项目和用例需求考虑许多标准。本研究提出了一种基于模糊AHP-TOPSIS方法的系统选择方法,该方法根据一组涵盖特征和非功能属性的选择标准对备选区块链平台进行比较和选择。通过实例研究,对所提出的选择方法的适用性进行了评价。将提出的三个主要阶段的选择方法应用于两个项目最合适的区块链平台的比较和选择。在案例研究中,根据项目需求得出的选择标准,为每个项目选择了三个区块链平台并进行了排名。两位项目代表对所建议的选择方法的适用性表现出强烈的认同。结果表明,本文提出的选择标准和选择方法可用于实际项目区块链平台的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Computer Science
Malaysian Journal of Computer Science COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Journal of Computer Science (ISSN 0127-9084) is published four times a year in January, April, July and October by the Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, since 1985. Over the years, the journal has gained popularity and the number of paper submissions has increased steadily. The rigorous reviews from the referees have helped in ensuring that the high standard of the journal is maintained. The objectives are to promote exchange of information and knowledge in research work, new inventions/developments of Computer Science and on the use of Information Technology towards the structuring of an information-rich society and to assist the academic staff from local and foreign universities, business and industrial sectors, government departments and academic institutions on publishing research results and studies in Computer Science and Information Technology through a scholarly publication.  The journal is being indexed and abstracted by Clarivate Analytics'' Web of Science and Elsevier''s Scopus
期刊最新文献
METHODICAL EVALUATION OF HEALTHCARE INTELLIGENCE FOR HUMAN LIFE DISEASE DETECTION DISINFORMATION DETECTION ABOUT ISLAMIC ISSUES ON SOCIAL MEDIA USING DEEP LEARNING TECHNIQUES ENHANCING SECURITY OF RFID-ENABLED IOT SUPPLY CHAIN A TRACE CLUSTERING FRAMEWORK FOR IMPROVING THE BEHAVIORAL AND STRUCTURAL QUALITY OF PROCESS MODELS IN PROCESS MINING IMPROVING COVERAGE AND NOVELTY OF ABSTRACTIVE TEXT SUMMARIZATION USING TRANSFER LEARNING AND DIVIDE AND CONQUER APPROACHES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1