Developing a test of reasoning for preadolescents

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Research & Method in Education Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI:10.1080/1743727X.2021.1990880
A. Ahmed, Christine Howe, L. Major, S. Hennessy, N. Mercer, P. Warwick
{"title":"Developing a test of reasoning for preadolescents","authors":"A. Ahmed, Christine Howe, L. Major, S. Hennessy, N. Mercer, P. Warwick","doi":"10.1080/1743727X.2021.1990880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As part of an investigation into the relationship between classroom dialogue and student outcome, a test of reasoning has been developed that is suitable for preadolescents (i.e. c.10–13-year-olds). Building on previous work but expanding this considerably, the test focuses upon four areas of reasoning: differentiation of facts from opinions, differentiation of reasons from conclusions, inference of implications, and evaluation of multiple reasons. This paper reports on the test’s design and development (including the repeated cycles of piloting and redrafting), highlighting the methodological challenges that were faced (e.g. from linguistic demands), and how these were addressed. It also outlines how the test was trialled in English schools, including its use in a paper-based version with 218 students, and in a digital version with 129 students. Patterns of student performance were comparable across the two samples and also provide evidence for acceptable test reliability and validity. Thus, in addition to spotlighting methodological issues of general relevance within educational research, the paper presents a test that successfully assesses key aspects of student reasoning. The test is the first of its kind to be designed for this age group, and is offered as freely available for future research.","PeriodicalId":51655,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.1990880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT As part of an investigation into the relationship between classroom dialogue and student outcome, a test of reasoning has been developed that is suitable for preadolescents (i.e. c.10–13-year-olds). Building on previous work but expanding this considerably, the test focuses upon four areas of reasoning: differentiation of facts from opinions, differentiation of reasons from conclusions, inference of implications, and evaluation of multiple reasons. This paper reports on the test’s design and development (including the repeated cycles of piloting and redrafting), highlighting the methodological challenges that were faced (e.g. from linguistic demands), and how these were addressed. It also outlines how the test was trialled in English schools, including its use in a paper-based version with 218 students, and in a digital version with 129 students. Patterns of student performance were comparable across the two samples and also provide evidence for acceptable test reliability and validity. Thus, in addition to spotlighting methodological issues of general relevance within educational research, the paper presents a test that successfully assesses key aspects of student reasoning. The test is the first of its kind to be designed for this age group, and is offered as freely available for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为青春期前儿童开发推理测试
摘要作为对课堂对话与学生成绩之间关系的调查的一部分,已经开发了一种适用于青春期前(即10-13岁)的推理测试。该测试在先前工作的基础上,但在很大程度上扩展了这一点,重点关注四个推理领域:事实与观点的区分、原因与结论的区分,含义的推断以及对多种原因的评估。本文报告了测试的设计和开发(包括试验和重新起草的重复周期),强调了所面临的方法挑战(例如来自语言需求),以及如何解决这些挑战。它还概述了该测试是如何在英国学校进行试验的,包括在218名学生的纸质版和129名学生的数字版中使用。两个样本的学生表现模式具有可比性,也为可接受的测试可靠性和有效性提供了证据。因此,除了强调教育研究中普遍相关的方法论问题外,本文还提出了一项测试,成功评估了学生推理的关键方面。该测试是第一个为这个年龄段设计的测试,并免费提供给未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Research & Method in Education is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that draws contributions from a wide community of international researchers. Contributions are expected to develop and further international discourse in educational research with a particular focus on method and methodological issues. The journal welcomes papers engaging with methods from within a qualitative or quantitative framework, or from frameworks which cut across and or challenge this duality. Papers should not solely focus on the practice of education; there must be a contribution to methodology. International Journal of Research & Method in Education is committed to publishing scholarly research that discusses conceptual, theoretical and methodological issues, provides evidence, support for or informed critique of unusual or new methodologies within educational research and provides innovative, new perspectives and examinations of key research findings. The journal’s enthusiasm to foster debate is also recognised in a keenness to include engaged, thought-provoking response papers to previously published articles. The journal is also interested in papers that discuss issues in the teaching of research methods for educational researchers. Contributors to International Journal of Research & Method in Education should take care to communicate their findings or arguments in a succinct, accessible manner to an international readership of researchers, policy-makers and practitioners from a range of disciplines including but not limited to philosophy, sociology, economics, psychology, and history of education. The Co-Editors welcome suggested topics for future Special Issues. Initial ideas should be discussed by email with the Co-Editors before a formal proposal is submitted for consideration.
期刊最新文献
Creating effective research partnerships with rural communities: a community culture framework Socially desirable resources and activities – evaluation of a new scale for the separate measurement of economic and cultural capital in educational research Catalyzing teacher moves in small-group problem solving: a quantitative discourse analysis Qualitative research during the COVID19 pandemic: the impact of remote research on the collaborative production of methodological knowledge Teacher reflection as a research method: using phenomenology to reflect on classroom events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1