The Financial Impact of High-Performance Work Practices: The Moderating Effects of Labor Market Flexibility and Labor Market Efficiency

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Contemporary Management Research Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.7903/cmr.19623
C. E. Hull, S. Rothenberg, Sebastian Vogt
{"title":"The Financial Impact of High-Performance Work Practices: The Moderating Effects of Labor Market Flexibility and Labor Market Efficiency","authors":"C. E. Hull, S. Rothenberg, Sebastian Vogt","doi":"10.7903/cmr.19623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High-performance work practices (HPWP) have been found to increase financial performance. Institutional theory suggests that this effect may be moderated by labor market institutions, such as labor market flexibility and labor market efficiency. We explore this relationship using a combined data set comprised of data on HPWP from ASSET4, financial and other company-level data from the Worldscope Database, and national institutional context data from the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report. With an international sample of roughly 20,000 archival firmyear observations across a seven-year period, we use pooled OLS regression models with robust standard errors, clustered at the firm level. We find support for all predicted relationships except for a direct relationship between labor market flexibility and performance: Strong formal institutional pressure (low labor market flexibility) increases the positive financial impact of HPWP. Strong informal institutional pressure (high labor market efficiency) affects the financial performance of businesses directly and positively, and also indirectly by increasing the positive effect of HPWP on financial performance. We conclude that companies seeking the most financially-rewarding approach to human resource management (HRM) should engage in HPWP, encourage the local population to Contemporary Management Research 248 expect and value such practices (e.g., by promoting women’s rights), and, counterintuitively, encourage more government regulation of business around HRM practices.","PeriodicalId":36973,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Management Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"247-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.19623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

High-performance work practices (HPWP) have been found to increase financial performance. Institutional theory suggests that this effect may be moderated by labor market institutions, such as labor market flexibility and labor market efficiency. We explore this relationship using a combined data set comprised of data on HPWP from ASSET4, financial and other company-level data from the Worldscope Database, and national institutional context data from the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report. With an international sample of roughly 20,000 archival firmyear observations across a seven-year period, we use pooled OLS regression models with robust standard errors, clustered at the firm level. We find support for all predicted relationships except for a direct relationship between labor market flexibility and performance: Strong formal institutional pressure (low labor market flexibility) increases the positive financial impact of HPWP. Strong informal institutional pressure (high labor market efficiency) affects the financial performance of businesses directly and positively, and also indirectly by increasing the positive effect of HPWP on financial performance. We conclude that companies seeking the most financially-rewarding approach to human resource management (HRM) should engage in HPWP, encourage the local population to Contemporary Management Research 248 expect and value such practices (e.g., by promoting women’s rights), and, counterintuitively, encourage more government regulation of business around HRM practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高绩效工作实践的财务影响:劳动力市场灵活性和劳动力市场效率的调节作用
高绩效工作实践(HPWP)已被发现可以提高财务绩效。制度理论认为,这种影响可能会受到劳动力市场制度的调节,如劳动力市场灵活性和劳动力市场效率。我们使用了一个组合数据集来探讨这种关系,该数据集由来自ASSET4的HPWP数据、来自Worldscope数据库的财务和其他公司层面数据以及来自世界经济论坛全球竞争力报告的国家机构背景数据组成。在7年的时间里,我们使用了大约20,000个档案公司年观察的国际样本,我们使用了具有鲁棒标准误差的汇集OLS回归模型,在公司层面聚集。除了劳动力市场灵活性和绩效之间的直接关系外,我们发现所有预测关系都得到了支持:强大的正式制度压力(低劳动力市场灵活性)增加了HPWP的积极财务影响。强大的非正式制度压力(高劳动力市场效率)直接和积极地影响企业的财务绩效,也间接地通过增加HPWP对财务绩效的积极作用。我们得出的结论是,寻求最具财务回报的人力资源管理(HRM)方法的公司应该参与HPWP,鼓励当地人口参与当代管理研究248,期望并重视这种做法(例如,通过促进妇女权利),并且,与直觉相反,鼓励政府更多地围绕人力资源管理实践对企业进行监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Management Research
Contemporary Management Research Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Key Determinants and Consequences of Brand Citizenship Behavior Factors Influencing Green Purchase Behavior: Price Sensitivity, Perceived Risk, and Attitude towards Green Products Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on Constructive Deviance among Frontline Employees in Commercial Banks: Do Organizational Identification and Psychological Safety Matter? Positive Relationships between Service Performance and Social Media Use in Internet Retailing The Role of Community Engagement and Entrepreneurship in the Sustainability Performance of Social Ventures in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1