Cultural Diversity Drives Innovation: Does Institutional Residence Time Impact Behaviors?

Fabrice Gallou, A. Grandeury, G. Jones
{"title":"Cultural Diversity Drives Innovation: Does Institutional Residence Time Impact Behaviors?","authors":"Fabrice Gallou, A. Grandeury, G. Jones","doi":"10.24840/2183-0606_009.004_0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation activities in large organizations are typically conducted by teams. Previous research noted the positive correlation between innovation performance and the cultural diversity of teams, wherein people from different backgrounds approach problems differently and have differing tolerances for risk. In a long term extension of these studies we aim to determine if these proclivities attenuate over time, as members modify & harmonize their behaviors driven by cultural norms of the organization. In an early read out from this effort, cohorts of innovation team members across several continents and representing six of the ten global cultural clusters completed a series of team analytics and questionnaires. The analytics were derived from cross-cultural communication frameworks which have been utilized to assess how culturally associated values influence behavioral traits. The respondents invited to participate were directly involved in innovation projects either as part of their main function or through membership of a specific innovation team and represented a range of experience levels. Subjects were also invited to offer written commentary on team and organizational culture as it applies to innovation. A definitive trend was uncovered wherein employee service time (in years) correlated with moves from cultural group norms towards more moderated, centrist decision making traits and lowered risk taking appetite. Further, specific indicators which correlate to disruptive ideation and innovation performance softened as a function of service time, independent of cultural origins. Together, this may signal a need for innovation teams to be mindful that balance is maintained with respect to members service time and new team entrants are supported to pursue high-risk high-reward ideas.","PeriodicalId":33389,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_009.004_0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Innovation activities in large organizations are typically conducted by teams. Previous research noted the positive correlation between innovation performance and the cultural diversity of teams, wherein people from different backgrounds approach problems differently and have differing tolerances for risk. In a long term extension of these studies we aim to determine if these proclivities attenuate over time, as members modify & harmonize their behaviors driven by cultural norms of the organization. In an early read out from this effort, cohorts of innovation team members across several continents and representing six of the ten global cultural clusters completed a series of team analytics and questionnaires. The analytics were derived from cross-cultural communication frameworks which have been utilized to assess how culturally associated values influence behavioral traits. The respondents invited to participate were directly involved in innovation projects either as part of their main function or through membership of a specific innovation team and represented a range of experience levels. Subjects were also invited to offer written commentary on team and organizational culture as it applies to innovation. A definitive trend was uncovered wherein employee service time (in years) correlated with moves from cultural group norms towards more moderated, centrist decision making traits and lowered risk taking appetite. Further, specific indicators which correlate to disruptive ideation and innovation performance softened as a function of service time, independent of cultural origins. Together, this may signal a need for innovation teams to be mindful that balance is maintained with respect to members service time and new team entrants are supported to pursue high-risk high-reward ideas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化多样性驱动创新:制度居住时间会影响行为吗?
大型组织中的创新活动通常由团队进行。先前的研究指出,创新绩效与团队文化多样性之间存在正相关关系,不同背景的人处理问题的方式不同,对风险的容忍度也不同。在这些研究的长期延伸中,我们的目标是确定这些倾向是否随着时间的推移而减弱,因为成员在组织文化规范的驱动下修改和协调他们的行为。在这项工作的早期解读中,来自几个大洲的创新团队成员,代表了十个全球文化集群中的六个,完成了一系列的团队分析和问卷调查。该分析来源于跨文化交流框架,该框架已被用于评估文化相关价值观如何影响行为特征。被邀请参与的受访者要么直接参与创新项目,要么作为其主要职能的一部分,要么作为特定创新团队的成员,代表了不同的经验水平。研究对象还被邀请就团队和组织文化在创新中的应用提供书面评论。研究发现了一个明确的趋势,即员工的服务时间(以年为单位)与从文化群体规范转向更温和、更中立的决策特征和更低的冒险意愿相关。此外,与颠覆性思维和创新绩效相关的具体指标随着服务时间的变化而软化,与文化起源无关。总之,这可能表明创新团队需要注意保持成员服务时间的平衡,并支持新团队进入者追求高风险高回报的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Innovation Management
Journal of Innovation Management Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Conceptual Framework for Workforce Skills for Industry 5.0: Implications for Research, Policy and Practice Open Innovation as Fuel for the Circular Economy: an Analysis of the Italian Context The Role of Innovation Management Tools in Generating Innovation Market Success How Innovation Systems Promote and Hinder Innovations in Healthcare - a Swedish Case Towards a Place-based Approach to Circular Innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1