Institutional Investors in the Czech Voucher Privatisation

Q2 Social Sciences Danube Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.2478/danb-2020-0020
Magdalena Šuterová
{"title":"Institutional Investors in the Czech Voucher Privatisation","authors":"Magdalena Šuterová","doi":"10.2478/danb-2020-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Voucher privatisation that proceeded in the Czech Republic in the 1990s was a realisation of a unique experiment which resulted in the transfer of almost half of state-owned enterprises to private hands within two years. A substantial part of these private hands was represented by intermediaries – the investment privatisation funds (IPFs). Their presence in the privatisation is often criticised as the cause of the extensive tunnelling. The aim of the paper is to find out how these funds performed after the privatisation. Using the standard Capital Asset Pricing Model, with OLS parameter estimations, I conclude that the so-called tunnelling was not as extensive, and that the privatisation funds were not as harmful for the privatisation as is believed.","PeriodicalId":38400,"journal":{"name":"Danube","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danube","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2020-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Voucher privatisation that proceeded in the Czech Republic in the 1990s was a realisation of a unique experiment which resulted in the transfer of almost half of state-owned enterprises to private hands within two years. A substantial part of these private hands was represented by intermediaries – the investment privatisation funds (IPFs). Their presence in the privatisation is often criticised as the cause of the extensive tunnelling. The aim of the paper is to find out how these funds performed after the privatisation. Using the standard Capital Asset Pricing Model, with OLS parameter estimations, I conclude that the so-called tunnelling was not as extensive, and that the privatisation funds were not as harmful for the privatisation as is believed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捷克代金券私有化的机构投资者
20世纪90年代在捷克共和国进行的代金券私有化是一项独特实验的实现,该实验导致近一半的国有企业在两年内转移到私人手中。这些私人手中的很大一部分是由中介机构-投资私有化基金(ipf)代表的。他们在私有化过程中的存在经常被批评为大量挖掘隧道的原因。本文的目的是找出这些基金在私有化后的表现。使用标准的资本资产定价模型,使用OLS参数估计,我得出的结论是,所谓的隧道掘进并不像人们认为的那样广泛,私有化资金对私有化的危害也不像人们认为的那样大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Danube
Danube Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Legal Gap in Refugee Protection in Non-Signatory Countries: An Evidence from Indonesia Legal Aspects of Virtual Assets Regulation in Ukraine System Management and Improvement of Payment Planning Processes in Production Engineering Does the Education of Mothers Affect Their Experience pf Motherhood and Parenthood? Selected Aspects in the Czech Republic Public Administration Effectiveness of the Agro-Trade between Ukraine and the Slovak Republic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1