Wright’s Sources: Compatibility with Other Filters and Parameters in EDD Online 4.0

Q2 Arts and Humanities Dictionaries Pub Date : 2022-01-06 DOI:10.1353/dic.2021.0026
M. Markus
{"title":"Wright’s Sources: Compatibility with Other Filters and Parameters in EDD Online 4.0","authors":"M. Markus","doi":"10.1353/dic.2021.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This paper focuses on the challenge that the revised edition of the English Dialect Dictionary Online (EDD Online), planned for 2022 as version 4.0, raises regarding the large number of sources used by Joseph Wright in his comprehensive English Dialect Dictionary (EDD; 1898–1905). In particular, it discusses the possibilities and limits of combining queries on sources with the various other search parameters and filters in the presently available online version of the EDD, thus paving the way for its improvement. This online version 3.0 was the product of a long-term project undertaken at the University of Inns-bruck. In the face of the intended revision work on our interface, the ten search parameters—from headwords to phrases—and the seven co-filters, such as usage labels, are tested in their relation to the filter sources, also considering the four different types of sources. Sections 2 to 5, after the Introduction, demonstrate these four types in turn. Given that any document of historiography, including language history as provided by the EDD, is only as good as its sources, the scrupulous analysis of Wright’s sources and of the limits of their compatibility with other search criteria is seen as an essential part of the overdue fair criticism of Wright’s unique achievement. The issue of the compatibility of search criteria in computerized dictionaries poses a new challenge that scholars have hardly responded to.","PeriodicalId":35106,"journal":{"name":"Dictionaries","volume":"42 1","pages":"169 - 190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dictionaries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dic.2021.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This paper focuses on the challenge that the revised edition of the English Dialect Dictionary Online (EDD Online), planned for 2022 as version 4.0, raises regarding the large number of sources used by Joseph Wright in his comprehensive English Dialect Dictionary (EDD; 1898–1905). In particular, it discusses the possibilities and limits of combining queries on sources with the various other search parameters and filters in the presently available online version of the EDD, thus paving the way for its improvement. This online version 3.0 was the product of a long-term project undertaken at the University of Inns-bruck. In the face of the intended revision work on our interface, the ten search parameters—from headwords to phrases—and the seven co-filters, such as usage labels, are tested in their relation to the filter sources, also considering the four different types of sources. Sections 2 to 5, after the Introduction, demonstrate these four types in turn. Given that any document of historiography, including language history as provided by the EDD, is only as good as its sources, the scrupulous analysis of Wright’s sources and of the limits of their compatibility with other search criteria is seen as an essential part of the overdue fair criticism of Wright’s unique achievement. The issue of the compatibility of search criteria in computerized dictionaries poses a new challenge that scholars have hardly responded to.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赖特的来源:与EDD在线4.0中其他过滤器和参数的兼容性
摘要:本文重点讨论了计划于2022年出版的《在线英语方言词典》(EDD Online) 4.0版修订版所面临的挑战,即约瑟夫·赖特在其综合性英语方言词典(EDD;1898 - 1905)。特别地,它讨论了在当前可用的在线EDD版本中将对源的查询与其他各种搜索参数和过滤器结合起来的可能性和局限性,从而为改进EDD铺平了道路。这个在线3.0版本是因斯布鲁克大学长期项目的成果。面对预期的界面修订工作,我们测试了10个搜索参数(从关键词到短语)和7个协同过滤器(如用法标签)与过滤器源的关系,同时考虑了四种不同类型的源。在引言之后的第2节到第5节依次演示了这四种类型。考虑到任何史学文献,包括EDD提供的语言历史文献,其质量取决于其来源,对赖特的来源及其与其他搜索标准兼容性的限制的严谨分析被视为对赖特独特成就的迟来的公正批评的重要组成部分。计算机化词典中检索标准的兼容性问题提出了一个新的挑战,学者们几乎没有回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dictionaries
Dictionaries Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Compiling The Oxford Dictionary of African American English: A Progress Report E. Ward Gilman: In Memoriam Editorial The Velar Nasal in thing and think: Evidence from Thomas Spence's (1775) Pronouncing Dictionary for the Eighteenth-Century English Phonology Database What is new in EDD Online 4.0?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1