A systematic review exploring the role of gender in staffs experience of working with sexual offenders

IF 0.5 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2021-10-13 DOI:10.1108/jcrpp-04-2021-0018
A. Woodhouse, Sarah Craven-Staines
{"title":"A systematic review exploring the role of gender in staffs experience of working with sexual offenders","authors":"A. Woodhouse, Sarah Craven-Staines","doi":"10.1108/jcrpp-04-2021-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAlthough literature surrounding sexual criminality is growing; with recent research, this paper aims to focus more upon burnout and emotional impact in therapists who study with sex offenders, little is known about possible gender differences in their experiences.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study presents a systematic review that aims to provide an impartial critical examination of relevant existing literature, with the main aim of exploring the role of gender (both the staff members and the clients) in staffs’ experience of working with sexual offenders.\n\n\nFindings\nFindings retrieved 10 eligible studies indicating evidence of the influential role in which gender plays in the experienced staff may have when working with sexual offenders. Studies within the review demonstrated variability in views towards sexual offenders across genders; with studies finding female staff to hold more positive perceptions of sexual offenders. Further evidence suggested a global impact of working with the client group; with professionals holding differential and largely more positive views of sexual offenders than the general public. However, an adverse impact of working with sexual offenders was highlighted, particularly for staff who have worked longest within their role or have increased frequency of contact.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nLimitations were highlighted in relation to the reviews ability to truly explore gender; given there are no current studies within this research area defining gender beyond male and female, losing the voices of those non-binary and transgendered individuals.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe paper includes implications for staff working with sexual offenders; including adverse affects of the clinical contact and the impact of working with same/opposing gendered clients. Research also takes a gender informed stance in exploring how staff gender impacts the relationships with sexual offenders, and the effect this may have on client outcomes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nResearch is the first of its kind in taking a systematic approach to exploring the current literature surrounding staffs experiences of working with sexual offenders, through a gender informed lens.\n","PeriodicalId":43553,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcrpp-04-2021-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Although literature surrounding sexual criminality is growing; with recent research, this paper aims to focus more upon burnout and emotional impact in therapists who study with sex offenders, little is known about possible gender differences in their experiences. Design/methodology/approach The study presents a systematic review that aims to provide an impartial critical examination of relevant existing literature, with the main aim of exploring the role of gender (both the staff members and the clients) in staffs’ experience of working with sexual offenders. Findings Findings retrieved 10 eligible studies indicating evidence of the influential role in which gender plays in the experienced staff may have when working with sexual offenders. Studies within the review demonstrated variability in views towards sexual offenders across genders; with studies finding female staff to hold more positive perceptions of sexual offenders. Further evidence suggested a global impact of working with the client group; with professionals holding differential and largely more positive views of sexual offenders than the general public. However, an adverse impact of working with sexual offenders was highlighted, particularly for staff who have worked longest within their role or have increased frequency of contact. Research limitations/implications Limitations were highlighted in relation to the reviews ability to truly explore gender; given there are no current studies within this research area defining gender beyond male and female, losing the voices of those non-binary and transgendered individuals. Practical implications The paper includes implications for staff working with sexual offenders; including adverse affects of the clinical contact and the impact of working with same/opposing gendered clients. Research also takes a gender informed stance in exploring how staff gender impacts the relationships with sexual offenders, and the effect this may have on client outcomes. Originality/value Research is the first of its kind in taking a systematic approach to exploring the current literature surrounding staffs experiences of working with sexual offenders, through a gender informed lens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨性别在员工处理性犯罪者经历中的作用的系统综述
目的尽管有关性犯罪的文献越来越多;通过最近的研究,本文旨在更多地关注性犯罪者治疗师的倦怠和情绪影响,但对他们经历中可能存在的性别差异知之甚少。设计/方法/方法该研究提出了一项系统综述,旨在对相关现有文献进行公正的批判性审查,主要目的是探讨性别(包括工作人员和客户)在工作人员处理性犯罪者的经历中的作用。FindingsFindings检索了10项符合条件的研究,这些研究表明,有经验的员工在处理性犯罪者时,性别可能发挥着重要作用。审查中的研究表明,不同性别对性犯罪者的看法存在差异;研究发现,女性员工对性犯罪者有更积极的看法。进一步的证据表明,与客户群体合作具有全球影响;与普通公众相比,专业人士对性犯罪者持有不同的、基本上更积极的看法。然而,强调了与性犯罪者合作的不利影响,特别是对在其职责范围内工作时间最长或接触频率增加的工作人员。研究的局限性/含义强调了审查真正探索性别的能力方面的局限性;鉴于目前在这一研究领域还没有定义男性和女性之外的性别的研究,失去了那些非二元和变性人的声音。实际含义该文件包括对处理性犯罪者的工作人员的含义;包括临床接触的不良影响以及与相同/相反性别的客户合作的影响。研究还采取了基于性别的立场,探讨员工性别如何影响与性犯罪者的关系,以及这可能对客户结果产生的影响。独创性/价值研究是同类研究中第一个采用系统的方法,通过性别知情的视角,探索当前围绕员工与性犯罪者共事经历的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
A quantitative analysis of gender impact in judgements of offenders with mental illnesses Best practice in sexual offender rehabilitation and reintegration programs What is optimal integrated multi-agency Throughcare? A global e-Delphi consensus study defining core components of effective rehabilitation and reintegration programming A Critical Framework for Analyzing the Impacts of Sub-Federal Immigration Policy in Post 9/11 United States Dangerous, Deserving, or Harmed: Understanding the Formation of Anti-Carceral Policy Attitudes Among Urban, Liberal Voters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1