{"title":"Ergoic framing in New Right online groups","authors":"Ondřej Procházka, J. Blommaert","doi":"10.1075/aral.19033.pro","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Conspiracy theories are often disqualified as inadequate and deliberate forms of misinformation. In this analysis,\n we engage with a specific case, the conspiracy theory developed on an online New Right forum called Q about the so-called “MAGA\n Kid incident” with focus on its circulation and uptake on Facebook. Drawing on ethnomethodological principles, the analysis shows\n how ergoic argumentation is systematically being deployed as a means of debunking rational-factual discourses about such\n incidents. While rationality itself is being rejected, conspiracy theorists deploy “reasonable” knowledge tactics. The paper shows\n how conspiracy theorists skillfully mobilize social media affordances, particularly Internet memes, to promote conspiracism as a\n form of inclusive political activism as well as a legitimate and “critical” mode of reasoning.","PeriodicalId":43911,"journal":{"name":"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.19033.pro","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Conspiracy theories are often disqualified as inadequate and deliberate forms of misinformation. In this analysis,
we engage with a specific case, the conspiracy theory developed on an online New Right forum called Q about the so-called “MAGA
Kid incident” with focus on its circulation and uptake on Facebook. Drawing on ethnomethodological principles, the analysis shows
how ergoic argumentation is systematically being deployed as a means of debunking rational-factual discourses about such
incidents. While rationality itself is being rejected, conspiracy theorists deploy “reasonable” knowledge tactics. The paper shows
how conspiracy theorists skillfully mobilize social media affordances, particularly Internet memes, to promote conspiracism as a
form of inclusive political activism as well as a legitimate and “critical” mode of reasoning.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Review of Applied Linguistics (ARAL) is the preeminent journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia (ALAA). ARAL is a peer reviewed journal that promotes scholarly discussion and contemporary understandings of language-related matters with a view to impacting on real-world problems and debates. The journal publishes empirical and theoretical research on language/s in educational, professional, institutional and community settings. ARAL welcomes national and international submissions presenting research related to any of the major sub-disciplines of Applied Linguistics as well as transdisciplinary studies. Areas of particular interest include but are not limited to: · Analysis of discourse and interaction · Assessment and evaluation · Bi/multilingualism and bi/multilingual education · Corpus linguistics · Cognitive linguistics · Language, culture and identity · Language maintenance and revitalization · Language planning and policy · Language teaching and learning, including specific languages and TESOL · Pragmatics · Research design and methodology · Second language acquisition · Sociolinguistics · Language and technology · Translating and interpreting.