Crowd and nation: Character in the age of race

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Tocqueville Review Pub Date : 2018-05-14 DOI:10.3138/TTR.39.1.75
M. Nacci
{"title":"Crowd and nation: Character in the age of race","authors":"M. Nacci","doi":"10.3138/TTR.39.1.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:What relationship is there between the crowd and the nation? This article investigates these two concepts during the epoch (last quarter of the XIXth century) which saw collective psychology flourish. According to collective psychology, the crowd is a single subject which does not coincide with the sum of the members making it up: the crowd, that is, has a face. The nation possesses the same feature, especially in the version of national character: each nation is a collective subject and each nation has its own personality. What is even more significant is that in both cases, the concepts of race, heredity and imitation play a very important role: the crowd expresses the soul of the race, and the nation is closely interlocked with the race. The crowd and the nation show in action a hereditary mechanism of a type, which is not individual, but collective, thanks to which their features are maintained through time. Finally, the crowd and the nation show the fundamental role which imitation plays within them: in the crowd, resembling others is pathological (autonomy and originality of individual judgement are lost), while sharing some features with other citizens within the nation serves to cement unity. Crowd, nation, race, heredity ceaselessly pursue each other giving rise to versions which may or may not be deterministic, naturalist, racialist, depending on the various authors.","PeriodicalId":41972,"journal":{"name":"Tocqueville Review","volume":"39 1","pages":"75 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tocqueville Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/TTR.39.1.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:What relationship is there between the crowd and the nation? This article investigates these two concepts during the epoch (last quarter of the XIXth century) which saw collective psychology flourish. According to collective psychology, the crowd is a single subject which does not coincide with the sum of the members making it up: the crowd, that is, has a face. The nation possesses the same feature, especially in the version of national character: each nation is a collective subject and each nation has its own personality. What is even more significant is that in both cases, the concepts of race, heredity and imitation play a very important role: the crowd expresses the soul of the race, and the nation is closely interlocked with the race. The crowd and the nation show in action a hereditary mechanism of a type, which is not individual, but collective, thanks to which their features are maintained through time. Finally, the crowd and the nation show the fundamental role which imitation plays within them: in the crowd, resembling others is pathological (autonomy and originality of individual judgement are lost), while sharing some features with other citizens within the nation serves to cement unity. Crowd, nation, race, heredity ceaselessly pursue each other giving rise to versions which may or may not be deterministic, naturalist, racialist, depending on the various authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
群体与民族:种族时代的性格
摘要:群众与民族是什么关系?在集体心理学蓬勃发展的时代(19世纪最后25年),本文考察了这两个概念。根据集体心理学,群体是一个单一的主体,它与组成它的所有成员的总和不一致:也就是说,群体是有面孔的。民族具有相同的特征,特别是在国民性的版本上:每个民族都是一个集体主体,每个民族都有自己的个性。更重要的是,在这两种情况下,种族、遗传和模仿的概念都起着非常重要的作用:人群表达了种族的灵魂,民族与种族紧密相连。人群和民族在行动中表现出一种类型的遗传机制,这种机制不是个人的,而是集体的,因此它们的特征得以保持。最后,群体和国家显示了模仿在他们内部所起的基本作用:在群体中,与他人相似是病态的(个人判断的自主性和原创性丧失了),而在国家内部与其他公民共享某些特征有助于巩固团结。群体、民族、种族、遗传不断地相互追求,产生了可能是也可能不是决定论的版本,自然主义的版本,种族主义的版本,取决于不同的作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tocqueville Review
Tocqueville Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
La conversion de l'histoire est-elle possible ? Les limites de l'influence de Carl Schmitt sur Raymond Aron : le concept de souveraineté de l'État et celui de l'hostilité absolue The American Red Cross and Disaster Relief in the 1960s: Nonprofits and Mass Philanthropy in an Era of Rising Expectations Comprendre "L'homme qui comprit la démocratie": Table ronde autour de l'ouvrage d'Olivier Zunz Getting Inequality Right: A Zunzian Perspective on the Reformulation of the American Promise The People's Branch: The U.S. Congress and the Democratic State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1