“My Sad Face”: An Interpersonal Metafunction Analysis of the Dialogue Between Nehemiah, Son of Hakaliah, and Artaxerxes, King of Persia, in Nehemiah 2,2-8

IF 0.1 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/09018328.2020.1805203
Andrew W. Dyck
{"title":"“My Sad Face”: An Interpersonal Metafunction Analysis of the Dialogue Between Nehemiah, Son of Hakaliah, and Artaxerxes, King of Persia, in Nehemiah 2,2-8","authors":"Andrew W. Dyck","doi":"10.1080/09018328.2020.1805203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, I define and apply M. Halliday’s interpersonal metafunction methodology, a socio-linguistic approach to language known as Systemic Functional Linguistics, to an analysis of the dialogue between Nehemiah, son of Hakaliah, and Artaxerxes, King of Persia, in Neh 2,2-8. My purpose is to discover some truths concerning the social dynamics that exist between Nehemiah and Artaxerxes to inevitably uncover who, that being the governing discourse participant, is responsible for and/or holds in his control Judah’s restoration. To accomplish this task, I conduct both a mirco- and macro-level analysis of the designated corpus. In the end, the data reveals that Artaxerxes is the governing discourse participant though Nehemiah dominates the discourse by saying more. However, taking the greater co-text and context of Nehemiah into consideration, specifically Nehemiah’s prayer of chapter 1, there is potentially a third unmentioned discourse participant who could well be the one governing the result of the present dialogue. This unmentioned discourse participant is invariably Yahweh.","PeriodicalId":42456,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament","volume":"34 1","pages":"161 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09018328.2020.1805203","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09018328.2020.1805203","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, I define and apply M. Halliday’s interpersonal metafunction methodology, a socio-linguistic approach to language known as Systemic Functional Linguistics, to an analysis of the dialogue between Nehemiah, son of Hakaliah, and Artaxerxes, King of Persia, in Neh 2,2-8. My purpose is to discover some truths concerning the social dynamics that exist between Nehemiah and Artaxerxes to inevitably uncover who, that being the governing discourse participant, is responsible for and/or holds in his control Judah’s restoration. To accomplish this task, I conduct both a mirco- and macro-level analysis of the designated corpus. In the end, the data reveals that Artaxerxes is the governing discourse participant though Nehemiah dominates the discourse by saying more. However, taking the greater co-text and context of Nehemiah into consideration, specifically Nehemiah’s prayer of chapter 1, there is potentially a third unmentioned discourse participant who could well be the one governing the result of the present dialogue. This unmentioned discourse participant is invariably Yahweh.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我悲伤的脸”:哈卡利亚之子尼希米与波斯国王亚达薛西斯在《尼希米书》中对话的人际元功能分析
摘要在本文中,我定义并应用哈利迪的人际元功能方法论,一种被称为系统功能语言学的语言社会语言学方法,来分析哈卡利亚之子尼希米与波斯国王阿尔塔薛西斯在Neh 2,2-8中的对话。我的目的是发现一些关于尼希米和阿尔塔薛西斯之间存在的社会动态的真相,以不可避免地揭示谁作为统治话语的参与者,负责和/或控制犹大的复辟。为了完成这项任务,我对指定的语料库进行了微观和宏观层面的分析。最后,数据显示,虽然尼希米通过说更多的话来主导话语,但阿尔塔薛西斯是话语的主导参与者。然而,考虑到尼希米的更大的共同文本和背景,特别是尼希米在第一章的祈祷,可能还有第三个未提及的话语参与者,他很可能是控制当前对话结果的人。这个未提及的话语参与者总是耶和华。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
An Intertextual Analysis of Jehu’s Violence in Kings and Chronicles (2 Kgs 9-10 and 2 Chr 21-24) Greece and Yehud in the Achaemenid Period: The Background of Cultural Transfer Longing for Flowing Streams—Water as Metaphor and Mediator in Psalm 42 “And They Reap the Wheat Harvest”: An Intertextual Investigation into the Meaning of a Small Remark in the Story of the Return of the Ark (I Samuel 6,13) Forty Years with SJOT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1