When public administration education switches online: Student perceptions during COVID-19

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching Public Administration Pub Date : 2022-09-14 DOI:10.1177/01447394221119092
Stuti Rawat, Yifei Yan, Alfred M. Wu, L. Vyas
{"title":"When public administration education switches online: Student perceptions during COVID-19","authors":"Stuti Rawat, Yifei Yan, Alfred M. Wu, L. Vyas","doi":"10.1177/01447394221119092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public administration education is traditionally known for its emphasis on interaction, discussion and experiential learning, which require effective in-person instructions. With COVID-19 pushing many programmes across the globe to be delivered online rather than in person, how this shift has affected the student experience in public administration programmes has been a pertinent and important consideration. This paper addresses the question through two surveys of 147 students in total, at a graduate-level public policy school in Singapore. Two distinctive waves of data collection allow us to capture a nuanced picture of student perceptions both when online teaching was introduced as an emergency response and when it was planned as a deliberate strategy later on. Our findings suggest that students consistently reported a decline in participation and interaction in an online setting, compared with a face-to-face setting. Our study fills a critical gap in the literature related to online public administration education in Asia, while the immediate constraints it highlights and lessons it offers on maintaining a highly interactive and engaging public administration education are likely to apply for educators elsewhere both during and beyond the COVID-19 era.","PeriodicalId":44241,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Public Administration","volume":"41 1","pages":"122 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394221119092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Public administration education is traditionally known for its emphasis on interaction, discussion and experiential learning, which require effective in-person instructions. With COVID-19 pushing many programmes across the globe to be delivered online rather than in person, how this shift has affected the student experience in public administration programmes has been a pertinent and important consideration. This paper addresses the question through two surveys of 147 students in total, at a graduate-level public policy school in Singapore. Two distinctive waves of data collection allow us to capture a nuanced picture of student perceptions both when online teaching was introduced as an emergency response and when it was planned as a deliberate strategy later on. Our findings suggest that students consistently reported a decline in participation and interaction in an online setting, compared with a face-to-face setting. Our study fills a critical gap in the literature related to online public administration education in Asia, while the immediate constraints it highlights and lessons it offers on maintaining a highly interactive and engaging public administration education are likely to apply for educators elsewhere both during and beyond the COVID-19 era.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当公共行政教育转向在线:新冠肺炎期间学生的看法
公共行政教育传统上以强调互动、讨论和体验式学习而闻名,这需要有效的亲自指导。随着新冠肺炎迫使全球许多课程在网上而不是亲自授课,这种转变如何影响学生在公共管理课程中的体验一直是一个相关而重要的考虑因素。本文通过对新加坡一所研究生级别的公共政策学院共147名学生的两项调查来解决这个问题。两次独特的数据收集浪潮使我们能够捕捉到学生对在线教学的微妙看法,无论是在将其作为应急措施引入时,还是在以后将其作为一种深思熟虑的策略进行规划时。我们的研究结果表明,与面对面环境相比,学生在在线环境中的参与度和互动度一直在下降。我们的研究填补了亚洲在线公共行政教育相关文献中的一个关键空白,而它强调的在保持高度互动和参与的公共行政教育方面的直接制约因素和经验教训可能适用于新冠肺炎时代及其后其他地方的教育工作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching Public Administration
Teaching Public Administration EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Teaching Public Administration (TPA) is a peer-reviewed journal, published three times a year, which focuses on teaching and learning in public sector management and organisations. TPA is committed to publishing papers which promote critical thinking about the practice and process of teaching and learning as well as those which examine more theoretical and conceptual models of teaching and learning. It offers an international forum for the debate of a wide range of issues relating to how skills and knowledge are transmitted and acquired within public sector/not for profit organisations. The Editors welcome papers which draw upon multi-disciplinary ways of thinking and working and, in particular, we are interested in the following themes/issues: Learning from international practice and experience; Curriculum design and development across all levels from pre-degree to post graduate including professional development; Professional and Taught Doctoral Programmes; Reflective Practice and the role of the Reflective Practitioner; Co-production and co-construction of the curriculum; Developments within the ‘Public Administration’ discipline; Reviews of literature and policy statements.
期刊最新文献
Does Gen-AI have a role in public affairs education? Let’s ask ChatGPT Minding the gap between public administration curriculum and practice: The studio of public reasoning Book Review: Trump and the bureaucrats: The fate of neutral competence Assessing the integration of AI competencies in undergraduate public administration curricula in selected South African higher education institutions Training and retraining civil servants in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1