Filming Real People

IF 0.4 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Visual Anthropology Pub Date : 2022-03-15 DOI:10.1080/08949468.2022.2063679
A. Mututa
{"title":"Filming Real People","authors":"A. Mututa","doi":"10.1080/08949468.2022.2063679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Filming Real People: Ethnographies of “On Demand” Films is an edited book bringing together authors of ethnographic video working in diverse regions of the world. It attends to the practices of visual ethnography in family, individual, group, and place videos. The book’s subject matter touches on productions of weddings, music, football, festival, activism, and ritual videos. In general the book’s concern is to criticize the optimal position of the visual ethnographer in the production of these videos; which the book posits as dynamic and flexible. From the discussions which inform the volume’s three-part structure, one notes an effort to theorize, or at least interrogate, the still controversial frontiers of ethnographic cinema. Notably, the book entreats various canonical discussions in the field of visual ethnography; for instance the discussion by Hockings et al. (2014), all of whom criticize the theoretical underpinnings of visual anthropology. Some of the ideas borrowed from these scholars include Hockings’ idea of visual anthropology as an encounter of media studies and sociocultural anthropology or vice versa (436), and the conjunction of emic and etic imagery in visual anthropology (437). Vailati and Villarreal’s book explores these dimensions of images by presenting the visual ethnographer in various meaning-searching roles—which I discuss below. Further, the methodological approaches within their book can be understood through Tomaselli’s theory of production of images and image analyses; and the visual ethnographer’s role as a decoder (textual analysis) and encoder (441). This is most apparent in the elaborate textual analysis and descriptive reportage used by various authors in Vailati and Villarreal’s book. Similarly, MacDougall’s theory of ontology of images, co-existing methodology, and epistemology of anthropological images gathered from “sensory, emotional, kinesic, performative, aesthetic, interpersonal, and subjective perspectives” (445), is reflected in the methodological approaches deployed by various authors in Filming Real People. For this reason, it is prudent to approach this book as an implementation of various existing theories in visual anthropology to the on-demand video genre. The theories noted above are useful in understanding both the essence and frontiers of Vailati and Villarreal’s 1","PeriodicalId":44055,"journal":{"name":"Visual Anthropology","volume":"35 1","pages":"213 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2022.2063679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Filming Real People: Ethnographies of “On Demand” Films is an edited book bringing together authors of ethnographic video working in diverse regions of the world. It attends to the practices of visual ethnography in family, individual, group, and place videos. The book’s subject matter touches on productions of weddings, music, football, festival, activism, and ritual videos. In general the book’s concern is to criticize the optimal position of the visual ethnographer in the production of these videos; which the book posits as dynamic and flexible. From the discussions which inform the volume’s three-part structure, one notes an effort to theorize, or at least interrogate, the still controversial frontiers of ethnographic cinema. Notably, the book entreats various canonical discussions in the field of visual ethnography; for instance the discussion by Hockings et al. (2014), all of whom criticize the theoretical underpinnings of visual anthropology. Some of the ideas borrowed from these scholars include Hockings’ idea of visual anthropology as an encounter of media studies and sociocultural anthropology or vice versa (436), and the conjunction of emic and etic imagery in visual anthropology (437). Vailati and Villarreal’s book explores these dimensions of images by presenting the visual ethnographer in various meaning-searching roles—which I discuss below. Further, the methodological approaches within their book can be understood through Tomaselli’s theory of production of images and image analyses; and the visual ethnographer’s role as a decoder (textual analysis) and encoder (441). This is most apparent in the elaborate textual analysis and descriptive reportage used by various authors in Vailati and Villarreal’s book. Similarly, MacDougall’s theory of ontology of images, co-existing methodology, and epistemology of anthropological images gathered from “sensory, emotional, kinesic, performative, aesthetic, interpersonal, and subjective perspectives” (445), is reflected in the methodological approaches deployed by various authors in Filming Real People. For this reason, it is prudent to approach this book as an implementation of various existing theories in visual anthropology to the on-demand video genre. The theories noted above are useful in understanding both the essence and frontiers of Vailati and Villarreal’s 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拍摄真人
《拍摄真实的人:点播电影的民族志》是一本经过编辑的书,汇集了在世界不同地区工作的民族志视频作者。它关注视觉民族志在家庭、个人、群体和场所视频中的实践。这本书的主题涉及婚礼、音乐、足球、节日、激进主义和仪式视频的制作。总的来说,这本书关注的是批评视觉民族志学家在这些视频制作中的最佳位置;这本书认为这是动态和灵活的。从为该卷三部分结构提供信息的讨论中,人们注意到了对人种学电影仍有争议的前沿进行理论化或至少质疑的努力。值得注意的是,这本书呼吁在视觉民族志领域进行各种规范性的讨论;例如,Hockings等人(2014)的讨论,他们都批评了视觉人类学的理论基础。从这些学者那里借来的一些思想包括霍金的视觉人类学思想,将其视为媒体研究和社会文化人类学的相遇,反之亦然(436),以及视觉人类学中主位图像和主位图像的结合(437)。Vailati和Villarreal的书通过展现视觉民族志学家在各种意义搜索角色中的角色来探索图像的这些维度——我将在下面讨论。此外,他们书中的方法论方法可以通过托马塞利的图像产生理论和图像分析来理解;以及视觉民族志学家作为解码器(文本分析)和编码器的角色(441)。这一点在Vailati和Villarreal的书中各作者使用的精心的文本分析和描述性报告文学中最为明显。同样,麦克唐纳的图像本体论、共存方法论和人类学图像认识论从“感官、情感、运动、表演、美学、人际和主观视角”(445)收集,反映在不同作者在《拍摄真实人物》中采用的方法论方法中。出于这个原因,谨慎的做法是将这本书视为视觉人类学中各种现有理论对点播视频类型的实施。上述理论有助于理解瓦伊拉蒂和比利亚雷亚尔的1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Visual Anthropology
Visual Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Visual Anthropology is a scholarly journal presenting original articles, commentary, discussions, film reviews, and book reviews on anthropological and ethnographic topics. The journal focuses on the study of human behavior through visual means. Experts in the field also examine visual symbolic forms from a cultural-historical framework and provide a cross-cultural study of art and artifacts. Visual Anthropology also promotes the study, use, and production of anthropological and ethnographic films, videos, and photographs for research and teaching.
期刊最新文献
“The People’s Garibaldi”: Twentieth-Century Politics of a Risorgimento Icon Into the Twentieth Century: Science and Entertainment, Two Realms Apart? The Material Politics of Graffiti Removal Contemporary Ethnographic Aesthetics: The TikTok Turn Photographing the Igbo Funeral: The Materiality of its Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1