Evaluation of Deep Learning Algorithms for Quadratic Hedging

SSRN Pub Date : 2022-07-07 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4062101
Zhiwen Dai, Lingfei Li, Gongqiu Zhang
{"title":"Evaluation of Deep Learning Algorithms for Quadratic Hedging","authors":"Zhiwen Dai, Lingfei Li, Gongqiu Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4062101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We solve the quadratic hedging problem by deep learning in discrete time. We consider three deep learning algorithms corresponding to three architectures of neural network approximation: approximating controls of different periods by different feedforward neural networks (FNNs) as proposed by Han and Weinan (2016), using a single FNN with decision time as an input to approximate controls of different periods, and using a recursive neural network (RNN) to utilize historical information. We evaluate these algorithms under the discrete-time Black-Scholes model and the DCC-GARCH model for hedging basket options on portfolios of up to 100 assets with time to maturity up to one year. We compare them in terms of their hedging error on the test data, extent of overlearning, learned hedging strategy, training speed, and scalability. Our results favor the single FNN and RNN approximations overall; the multiple FNN approximation can fail for a large portfolio and a long maturity. We also evaluate the performance of the single FNN and RNN algorithms in a data-driven framework, where data is generated by resampling without assuming any parametric model.","PeriodicalId":74863,"journal":{"name":"SSRN","volume":"30 1","pages":"32 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSRN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4062101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We solve the quadratic hedging problem by deep learning in discrete time. We consider three deep learning algorithms corresponding to three architectures of neural network approximation: approximating controls of different periods by different feedforward neural networks (FNNs) as proposed by Han and Weinan (2016), using a single FNN with decision time as an input to approximate controls of different periods, and using a recursive neural network (RNN) to utilize historical information. We evaluate these algorithms under the discrete-time Black-Scholes model and the DCC-GARCH model for hedging basket options on portfolios of up to 100 assets with time to maturity up to one year. We compare them in terms of their hedging error on the test data, extent of overlearning, learned hedging strategy, training speed, and scalability. Our results favor the single FNN and RNN approximations overall; the multiple FNN approximation can fail for a large portfolio and a long maturity. We also evaluate the performance of the single FNN and RNN algorithms in a data-driven framework, where data is generated by resampling without assuming any parametric model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二次套期保值的深度学习算法评估
我们在离散时间内通过深度学习来解决二次套期保值问题。我们考虑了三种深度学习算法,它们对应于神经网络逼近的三种架构:Han和Weinan(2016)提出的通过不同的前馈神经网络(FNN)逼近不同时期的控制,使用具有决策时间的单个FNN作为不同时期的近似控制的输入,以及使用递归神经网络(RNN)来利用历史信息。我们在离散时间Black-Scholes模型和DCC-GARCH模型下评估了这些算法,用于对冲到期时间为一年的100种资产组合的篮子期权。我们从测试数据的套期保值误差、超额收益程度、学习的套期保值策略、训练速度和可扩展性等方面对它们进行了比较。我们的结果总体上支持单一的FNN和RNN近似;对于大的投资组合和长的到期日,多重FNN近似可能失败。我们还评估了数据驱动框架中单个FNN和RNN算法的性能,其中数据是在不假设任何参数模型的情况下通过重新采样生成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stocks as a Hedge against Inflation: Does Corporate Profitability Keep Up with Inflation? How Useful Is a Prospectus in Identifying Greenwashing versus True ESG Funds? Beyond Direct Indexing: Dynamic Direct Long-Short Investing The Hidden Cost in Costless Put-Spread Collars: Rebalance Timing Luck Investing in Carbon Credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1