The Rupture of Revolutionary Coalition After Color Revolution: The Semi-Negative Case Comparison of Egypt and Tunisia

Yiqi Zhou, Shiping Tang
{"title":"The Rupture of Revolutionary Coalition After Color Revolution: The Semi-Negative Case Comparison of Egypt and Tunisia","authors":"Yiqi Zhou, Shiping Tang","doi":"10.1080/25765949.2021.1984068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The formation of revolutionary coalition is the key to the success of colour revolutions. However, the regime overthrown by the coalition is always followed by the dissolution of such revolutionary coalition, and some members of the coalition will provoke violent internecine. The article addresses the root cause of the violent rupture of revolutionary coalition after the colour revolution. The authors argue that the revolutionary coalition collapses because some members decide to borrow arms to defeat their competitors in the coalition. Since the only member possessing such violent tools in the colour revolutions tend to be the military of former regime who sides with revolutionary movement, it is the unbalanced relationship between the military and political members in the coalition that will lead to the rupture of the coalition. When there is a balanced relationship between the two parties, the military will remain neutral among different political members when facing the political competition, and such coalition can avoid the violent rupture. While the relationship is unbalanced, the military will be intertwined in the political competition, leading to the rupture. The article adopts an innovative research method of semi-negative comparison to study two cases of Egypt and Tunisia from Arab Spring.","PeriodicalId":29909,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies","volume":"15 1","pages":"344 - 359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25765949.2021.1984068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The formation of revolutionary coalition is the key to the success of colour revolutions. However, the regime overthrown by the coalition is always followed by the dissolution of such revolutionary coalition, and some members of the coalition will provoke violent internecine. The article addresses the root cause of the violent rupture of revolutionary coalition after the colour revolution. The authors argue that the revolutionary coalition collapses because some members decide to borrow arms to defeat their competitors in the coalition. Since the only member possessing such violent tools in the colour revolutions tend to be the military of former regime who sides with revolutionary movement, it is the unbalanced relationship between the military and political members in the coalition that will lead to the rupture of the coalition. When there is a balanced relationship between the two parties, the military will remain neutral among different political members when facing the political competition, and such coalition can avoid the violent rupture. While the relationship is unbalanced, the military will be intertwined in the political competition, leading to the rupture. The article adopts an innovative research method of semi-negative comparison to study two cases of Egypt and Tunisia from Arab Spring.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颜色革命后革命联盟的破裂:埃及与突尼斯的半负面案例比较
摘要革命联盟的形成是色彩革命成功的关键。然而,在联盟推翻政权之后,这种革命联盟总是会解散,联盟中的一些成员会挑起暴力自相残杀。本文论述了颜色革命后革命联盟暴力破裂的根本原因。作者认为,革命联盟的崩溃是因为一些成员决定借用武器来击败联盟中的竞争对手。由于在颜色革命中,唯一拥有这种暴力工具的成员往往是支持革命运动的前政权军队,因此,正是联盟中军政成员之间的不平衡关系导致了联盟的破裂。当两党关系平衡时,军队在面对政治竞争时会在不同政治成员之间保持中立,这样的联盟可以避免暴力破裂。在这种关系不平衡的同时,军队将在政治竞争中相互交织,导致破裂。本文采用半负比较的创新研究方法,对阿拉伯之春的埃及和突尼斯两个案例进行了研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
The Cooperation between China and the Gulf Arab States in the Horn of Africa: From the Perspective of the Global South Hajj Factor in Saudi Arabia and Somaliland Relations China’s Views on Solving the Yemeni Issue Within the Framework of Global Security Initiative Producing Knowledge in the War Zones: Challenges and Risks of Academia in Rojava Israel’s Domestic Policy on Islam-Related Issues: A Preliminary Appraisal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1