That one doctor. . . Qualitative thematic analysis of 49 women’s written accounts of their endometriosis diagnosis

IF 0.6 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1177/2284026520984366
N. Fernley
{"title":"That one doctor. . . Qualitative thematic analysis of 49 women’s written accounts of their endometriosis diagnosis","authors":"N. Fernley","doi":"10.1177/2284026520984366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: One in nine women experience endometriosis, a common gynaecological disease, yet time to diagnosis averages 7 years. People are sharing their endometriosis experiences online. This research’s aim was to expose and synthesise the collective themes of diagnostic experience. Method: A qualitative thematic analysis of publicly accessible online autobiographical accounts of women and their endometriosis diagnosis. Themes were coded within NVIVO and thematic maps and tables created. Eighty-nine original accounts were identified, 26 were excluded. Saturation point was 49. Results: Women communicated long, painful and emotional journeys to diagnosis. Forty women experienced endometriosis symptoms before the age of 20, 33 before 15 years. Despite repeated GP presentation, 36 women had never heard of endometriosis before diagnosis. Women highlighted the positive impact of ‘that one doctor’ who said the word ‘endometriosis’ who listened, believed, investigated and provided prompt referral to specialists. Diagnosis gave relief and answers to the long journey, provided women a sense of community, hope and personal visibility after feeling alone. While this common disease is undiagnosed women suffer. Conclusion: ‘That one doctor’ can transform a patient’s experience and create a positive diagnosis pathway towards endometriosis. The doctor patient alliance is vital for prompt diagnosis. Symptom dismissal with long diagnosis delays are having negative, physical and psychological consequences for women. Early detection, GP education and community awareness campaigns are imperative to reduce further delayed diagnosis and long-term negative impacts of undiagnosed endometriosis.","PeriodicalId":15725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","volume":"13 1","pages":"40 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2284026520984366","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2284026520984366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction: One in nine women experience endometriosis, a common gynaecological disease, yet time to diagnosis averages 7 years. People are sharing their endometriosis experiences online. This research’s aim was to expose and synthesise the collective themes of diagnostic experience. Method: A qualitative thematic analysis of publicly accessible online autobiographical accounts of women and their endometriosis diagnosis. Themes were coded within NVIVO and thematic maps and tables created. Eighty-nine original accounts were identified, 26 were excluded. Saturation point was 49. Results: Women communicated long, painful and emotional journeys to diagnosis. Forty women experienced endometriosis symptoms before the age of 20, 33 before 15 years. Despite repeated GP presentation, 36 women had never heard of endometriosis before diagnosis. Women highlighted the positive impact of ‘that one doctor’ who said the word ‘endometriosis’ who listened, believed, investigated and provided prompt referral to specialists. Diagnosis gave relief and answers to the long journey, provided women a sense of community, hope and personal visibility after feeling alone. While this common disease is undiagnosed women suffer. Conclusion: ‘That one doctor’ can transform a patient’s experience and create a positive diagnosis pathway towards endometriosis. The doctor patient alliance is vital for prompt diagnosis. Symptom dismissal with long diagnosis delays are having negative, physical and psychological consequences for women. Early detection, GP education and community awareness campaigns are imperative to reduce further delayed diagnosis and long-term negative impacts of undiagnosed endometriosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
那个医生。49名女性子宫内膜异位症诊断书面报告的定性专题分析
引言:九分之一的女性患有子宫内膜异位症,这是一种常见的妇科疾病,但平均诊断时间为7 年。人们在网上分享他们的子宫内膜异位症经历。这项研究的目的是揭示和综合诊断经验的集体主题。方法:对女性及其子宫内膜异位症诊断的公开在线自传体描述进行定性专题分析。在NVIVO中对主题进行了编码,并创建了主题地图和表格。确认了89个原始账户,26个被排除在外。饱和点为49。结果:女性沟通了漫长、痛苦和情绪化的诊断过程。40名女性在20岁前出现子宫内膜异位症症状,33名女性在15岁前出现 年。尽管反复进行全科医生检查,但36名女性在确诊前从未听说过子宫内膜异位症。女性强调了说出“子宫内膜异位症”一词的“那个医生”的积极影响,她倾听、相信、调查并及时转诊给专家。诊断为漫长的旅程提供了解脱和答案,为女性在感到孤独后提供了社区感、希望和个人可见性。虽然这种常见的疾病是未被诊断的妇女遭受痛苦。结论:“一个医生”可以改变患者的经历,为子宫内膜异位症的诊断开辟积极的途径。医患联盟对及时诊断至关重要。症状消失和长期诊断延误对女性产生了负面的身体和心理后果。早期发现、全科医生教育和社区意识运动对于减少未诊断子宫内膜异位症的进一步延迟诊断和长期负面影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Endometriosis on TikTok: Evaluating social media misinformation and the role of healthcare professionals When cystoscopy catches what laparoscopy misses: The role of cystoscopy in evaluation of bladder endometriosis Comprehensive management of umbilical endometriosis using a unique laparoscopic entry portal (Darwish point) and postoperative Dienogest Chronic pelvic pain: An underrecognised perioperative consideration The Holy Grail of endometriosis biomarkers in the diagnostic process – How much would it be worth and what does it look like?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1