Casein-Hydrolysate-Loaded W/O Emulsion Preparation as the Primary Emulsion of Double Emulsions: Effects of Varied Phase Fractions, Emulsifier Types, and Concentrations

IF 2.5 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Colloids and Interfaces Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.3390/colloids7010001
P. Salum, Çağla Ulubaş, O. Güven, L. Y. Aydemir, Z. Erbay
{"title":"Casein-Hydrolysate-Loaded W/O Emulsion Preparation as the Primary Emulsion of Double Emulsions: Effects of Varied Phase Fractions, Emulsifier Types, and Concentrations","authors":"P. Salum, Çağla Ulubaş, O. Güven, L. Y. Aydemir, Z. Erbay","doi":"10.3390/colloids7010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stable primary emulsion formation in which different parameters such as viscosity and droplet size come into prominence for their characterization is a key factor in W/O/W emulsions. In this study, different emulsifiers (Crill™ 1, Crill™ 4, AMP, and PGPR) were studied to produce a casein-hydrolysate-loaded stable primary emulsion with lower viscosity and droplet size. Viscosity, electrical conductivity, particle size distribution, and emulsion stability were determined for three different dispersed phase ratios and three emulsifier concentrations. In 31 of the 36 examined emulsion systems, no electrical conductivity could be measured, indicating that appropriate emulsions were formed. While AMP-based emulsions showed non-Newtonian flow behaviors with high consistency coefficients, all PGPR-based emulsions and most of the Crill™-1- and -4-based ones were Newtonian fluids with relatively low viscosities (65.7–274.7 cP). The PGPR-based emulsions were stable for at least 5 days and had D(90) values lower than 2 µm, whereas Crill™-1- and -4-based emulsions had phase separation after 24 h and had minimum D(90) values of 6.8 µm. PGPR-based emulsions were found suitable and within PGPR-based emulsions, and the best formulation was determined by TOPSIS. Using 5% PGPR with a 25% dispersed phase ratio resulted in the highest relative closeness value. The results of this study showed that PGPR is a very effective emulsifier for stable casein-hydrolysate-loaded emulsion formations with low droplet size and viscosity.","PeriodicalId":10433,"journal":{"name":"Colloids and Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloids and Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids7010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stable primary emulsion formation in which different parameters such as viscosity and droplet size come into prominence for their characterization is a key factor in W/O/W emulsions. In this study, different emulsifiers (Crill™ 1, Crill™ 4, AMP, and PGPR) were studied to produce a casein-hydrolysate-loaded stable primary emulsion with lower viscosity and droplet size. Viscosity, electrical conductivity, particle size distribution, and emulsion stability were determined for three different dispersed phase ratios and three emulsifier concentrations. In 31 of the 36 examined emulsion systems, no electrical conductivity could be measured, indicating that appropriate emulsions were formed. While AMP-based emulsions showed non-Newtonian flow behaviors with high consistency coefficients, all PGPR-based emulsions and most of the Crill™-1- and -4-based ones were Newtonian fluids with relatively low viscosities (65.7–274.7 cP). The PGPR-based emulsions were stable for at least 5 days and had D(90) values lower than 2 µm, whereas Crill™-1- and -4-based emulsions had phase separation after 24 h and had minimum D(90) values of 6.8 µm. PGPR-based emulsions were found suitable and within PGPR-based emulsions, and the best formulation was determined by TOPSIS. Using 5% PGPR with a 25% dispersed phase ratio resulted in the highest relative closeness value. The results of this study showed that PGPR is a very effective emulsifier for stable casein-hydrolysate-loaded emulsion formations with low droplet size and viscosity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酪蛋白水解液负载W/O乳化液制备双乳的主乳:不同相分数、乳化剂类型和浓度的影响
稳定的初级乳状液形成过程中,不同的参数如粘度和液滴大小对其表征的重要性是一个关键因素。在本研究中,研究了不同的乳化剂(Crill™1,Crill™4,AMP和PGPR),以生产具有较低粘度和液滴尺寸的酪蛋白水解物负载稳定的初级乳液。测定了三种不同分散相比和乳化剂浓度下的粘度、电导率、粒径分布和乳液稳定性。在36个乳状液体系中,有31个体系的电导率无法测量,这表明形成了合适的乳状液。基于amp的乳剂具有高稠度系数的非牛顿流体流动行为,而所有基于pgpr的乳剂以及大部分基于Crill™-1和-4的乳剂均为牛顿流体,粘度相对较低(65.7-274.7 cP)。基于pgpr的乳剂至少稳定5天,D(90)值低于2µm,而基于Crill™-1-和-4的乳剂在24 h后发生相分离,D(90)值最小为6.8µm。结果表明,pgpr基乳剂是合适的,在pgpr基乳剂内,TOPSIS法确定了最佳配方。使用5%的PGPR和25%的分散相比获得了最高的相对接近值。本研究结果表明,PGPR是一种非常有效的乳化剂,可以形成稳定的低液滴大小和粘度的酪蛋白水解物乳液。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Colloids and Interfaces
Colloids and Interfaces CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
64
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Co-Encapsulation of Paclitaxel and Doxorubicin in Liposomes Layer by Layer Study of Interfacial Properties of Anionic–Nonionic Surfactants Based on Succinic Acid Derivatives via Molecular Dynamics Simulations and the IGMH Method Discontinuous Shear Thickening of Suspensions of Magnetic Particles in Relation to the Polymer Coating on Their Surfaces Flowable Electrodes from Colloidal Suspensions of Thin Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes A Review of Investigations and Applications of Biocides in Nanomaterials and Nanotechnologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1