The effect of crop rotation and tillage practice on residue decomposition and wheat performance in the Western Cape, South Africa

Johannes Stephanus Theron, G. J. van Coller, L. Rose, J. Labuschagne, P. Swanepoel
{"title":"The effect of crop rotation and tillage practice on residue decomposition and wheat performance in the Western Cape, South Africa","authors":"Johannes Stephanus Theron, G. J. van Coller, L. Rose, J. Labuschagne, P. Swanepoel","doi":"10.1080/02571862.2022.2160881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conservation agriculture relies on residue retention, crop rotation and reduced tillage. Crop rotation determines residue type, while tillage affects residue load and distribution. Although crop residue retention is often beneficial, residues can create challenges, including obstruction of planters during establishment and stubble-borne diseases. This study determined the effects of crop rotation and tillage on the residue decomposition and response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Wheat response was investigated to determine relationships between residue decomposition and its agronomic performance. Crop rotations in long-term trials in areas of the Swartland and southern Cape consisted of the following: wheat–medics, lupin–wheat–canola–wheat, canola–wheat–lupin–wheat, and a wheat monoculture. Crops were established with four tillage practices: conventional tillage (CT: chisel plough followed by soil inversion/ploughing, tine planter establishment), minimum tillage (MT: chisel plough, tine planter establishment), no-tillage (NT: direct drilling with tine planter) and zero tillage (ZT: direct drilling with double disc planter). Crop rotation had no effect on residue decomposition but increased wheat leaf area and grain yield when rotated with medics, lupin and canola when compared with monoculture wheat. ZT increased residue load and improved seedling establishment. ZT (50.9%) and NT (51.1%) increased residue decomposition compared with CT (34%). Faster residue decomposition could be achieved with less soil disturbance.","PeriodicalId":21920,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2022.2160881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Conservation agriculture relies on residue retention, crop rotation and reduced tillage. Crop rotation determines residue type, while tillage affects residue load and distribution. Although crop residue retention is often beneficial, residues can create challenges, including obstruction of planters during establishment and stubble-borne diseases. This study determined the effects of crop rotation and tillage on the residue decomposition and response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Wheat response was investigated to determine relationships between residue decomposition and its agronomic performance. Crop rotations in long-term trials in areas of the Swartland and southern Cape consisted of the following: wheat–medics, lupin–wheat–canola–wheat, canola–wheat–lupin–wheat, and a wheat monoculture. Crops were established with four tillage practices: conventional tillage (CT: chisel plough followed by soil inversion/ploughing, tine planter establishment), minimum tillage (MT: chisel plough, tine planter establishment), no-tillage (NT: direct drilling with tine planter) and zero tillage (ZT: direct drilling with double disc planter). Crop rotation had no effect on residue decomposition but increased wheat leaf area and grain yield when rotated with medics, lupin and canola when compared with monoculture wheat. ZT increased residue load and improved seedling establishment. ZT (50.9%) and NT (51.1%) increased residue decomposition compared with CT (34%). Faster residue decomposition could be achieved with less soil disturbance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非西开普省轮作和耕作方式对秸秆分解和小麦生产性能的影响
保护性农业依赖于残留物保留、作物轮作和减少耕作。轮作决定了残留物的类型,而耕作影响残留物的负载和分布。尽管作物残留物的保留通常是有益的,但残留物可能会带来挑战,包括在种植过程中阻碍种植园主生长和麦茬传播疾病。本研究确定了作物轮作和耕作对南非西开普省小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)残留物分解和响应的影响。研究了小麦的反应,以确定残留物分解与其农艺性能之间的关系。斯沃特兰和南开普省地区长期试验的作物轮作包括以下内容:小麦-医务人员、羽扇豆-小麦-油菜-小麦、油菜-小麦-羽扇豆小麦和小麦单一栽培。采用四种耕作方法种植作物:常规耕作(CT:凿犁,然后翻土/翻耕,建立播种机)、最少耕作(MT:凿犁、建立播种机,免耕(NT:用播种机直接钻孔)和免耕(ZT:用双圆盘播种机直接钻孔)。与单作小麦相比,轮作对残渣分解没有影响,但与苜蓿、羽扇豆和油菜轮作时,小麦叶面积和产量增加。ZT增加了残留量,提高了成苗率。ZT(50.9%)和NT(51.1%)比CT(34%)增加了残留物分解。残渣分解速度更快,土壤扰动更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Plant and Soil
South African Journal of Plant and Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal has a proud history of publishing quality papers in the fields of applied plant and soil sciences and has, since its inception, recorded a vast body of scientific information with particular reference to South Africa.
期刊最新文献
The impact of planting dates and hybrid selection on sunflower seed yield and oil content Comparison of the effectiveness of mined and by-product South African gypsums and other calcium sources for soil sodicity remediation Nutrient uptake and yield response of wheat ( Triticum spp.) to different fertiliser applications in Ethiopia Transpiration efficiency of lucerne under unlimited soil water conditions during the first growing season Digital soil mapping enables informed decision-making to conserve soils within protected areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1