OER Impact Assessment: A framework for higher education institutions and beyond. Approaches to assess the impact of Open Educational Resources

Q2 Social Sciences Open Education Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1515/edu-2022-0018
Martin Ebner, Dominic Orr, Sandra Schön
{"title":"OER Impact Assessment: A framework for higher education institutions and beyond. Approaches to assess the impact of Open Educational Resources","authors":"Martin Ebner, Dominic Orr, Sandra Schön","doi":"10.1515/edu-2022-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of approaches to and insights for impact assessment on open educational resources (OER) in higher education and building on this to sketch a framework for university focussed OER impact assessment. The authors describe the literature on impact assessment in the OER context and the existing contributions to OER impact assessment in higher education. Findings of the analysis are that there are few contributions on the effects of OER in general or of specific OER initiatives. Four contributions are presented in more detail. From these examples and the literature analysis, derivations, and challenges for OER impact assessment are drawn, such as the large diversity in OER purposes and the invisibility of the re-usage of OER. The contribution sketches a framework model for describing OER-relevant results, outcomes, and impact, and more specifically demonstrates how this can be done for exemplary OER-related objectives. This contribution is thus of relevance to funding bodies and institutions working in the context of higher education that wish to systematically evaluate and monitor statements about the effectiveness of OER activities according to the UNESCO (2019) OER recommendation.","PeriodicalId":33645,"journal":{"name":"Open Education Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"296 - 309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Education Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2022-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of approaches to and insights for impact assessment on open educational resources (OER) in higher education and building on this to sketch a framework for university focussed OER impact assessment. The authors describe the literature on impact assessment in the OER context and the existing contributions to OER impact assessment in higher education. Findings of the analysis are that there are few contributions on the effects of OER in general or of specific OER initiatives. Four contributions are presented in more detail. From these examples and the literature analysis, derivations, and challenges for OER impact assessment are drawn, such as the large diversity in OER purposes and the invisibility of the re-usage of OER. The contribution sketches a framework model for describing OER-relevant results, outcomes, and impact, and more specifically demonstrates how this can be done for exemplary OER-related objectives. This contribution is thus of relevance to funding bodies and institutions working in the context of higher education that wish to systematically evaluate and monitor statements about the effectiveness of OER activities according to the UNESCO (2019) OER recommendation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OER影响评估:高等教育机构及其他机构的框架。评估开放教育资源影响的方法
摘要本文的目的是概述高等教育开放教育资源(OER)影响评估的方法和见解,并在此基础上勾勒出以大学为重点的OER影响评估框架。作者描述了OER背景下影响评估的文献,以及对高等教育中OER影响评估的现有贡献。分析结果表明,对总体OER或特定OER举措的影响几乎没有贡献。更详细地介绍了四项贡献。从这些例子和文献分析中,得出了OER影响评估的推论和挑战,例如OER目的的巨大多样性和OER重复使用的不可见性。该贡献描绘了一个框架模型,用于描述与OER相关的结果、结果和影响,并更具体地展示了如何为示例性的OER相关目标做到这一点。因此,这一贡献与在高等教育领域工作的资助机构和机构有关,这些机构和机构希望根据联合国教科文组织(2019)的OER建议,系统地评估和监督关于OER活动有效性的声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Education Studies
Open Education Studies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Why are These Problems Still Unresolved?” Those Pending Problems, and Neglected Contradictions in Online Classroom in the Post-COVID-19 Era Limits of Metacognitive Prompts for Confidence Judgments in an Interactive Learning Environment Fostering Creativity in Higher Education Institution: A Systematic Review (2018–2022) The Flipped Classroom Optimized Through Gamification and Team-Based Learning Deconstructing Teacher Engagement Techniques for Pre-service Teachers through Explicitly Teaching and Applying “Noticing” in Video Observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1