Heating pad vs. infusion warmer to prevent hypothermia in intraopera-tive patients: which one is more effective?

I. G. E. Arinjaya, I. Suyasa, I. M. Rismawan, Agus Baratha Suyasa
{"title":"Heating pad vs. infusion warmer to prevent hypothermia in intraopera-tive patients: which one is more effective?","authors":"I. G. E. Arinjaya, I. Suyasa, I. M. Rismawan, Agus Baratha Suyasa","doi":"10.30595/medisains.v19i2.11034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of heating pads and infusion warmers on intraoperative patients has been proven to prevent hypothermia. However, the differences in the effectiveness of the two methods have not been studied.Purpose: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of a heating pad and infusion warmer in preventing hypothermia (decreased body temperature and the incidence of shivering) in intraoperative patients.Methods: This research was a quasi-experimental design by a Posttest-Only Design with Nonequivalent Groups. The populations in this study were surgical patients with regional anesthesia, with a total sample of 64 respondents (32 respondents in the heating pad group and 32 respondents in the infusion warmer group) selected randomly. The incidence of hypothermia was perceived from two indicators: a decrease in body temperature and the prevalence of shivering, which was observed and recorded during the intraoperative period. The data were analyzed by discrimination tests (mean discrimination test and proportion discrimination test) to determine the difference in the effectiveness of the two groups.Results: The average decrease in body temperature during the intraoperative period (0-40 minutes of operation) in the group given the infusion warmer was greater than the group given the heating pad (p<0.001). The group given the infusion warmer was 8.750 times more likely to experience shivering than the group given the heating pad (p<0.001; OR=8.750).Conclusion: Using a heating pad is better in preventing hypothermia in intraoperative patients than using an infusion warmer.","PeriodicalId":52913,"journal":{"name":"Medisains","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medisains","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30595/medisains.v19i2.11034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of heating pads and infusion warmers on intraoperative patients has been proven to prevent hypothermia. However, the differences in the effectiveness of the two methods have not been studied.Purpose: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of a heating pad and infusion warmer in preventing hypothermia (decreased body temperature and the incidence of shivering) in intraoperative patients.Methods: This research was a quasi-experimental design by a Posttest-Only Design with Nonequivalent Groups. The populations in this study were surgical patients with regional anesthesia, with a total sample of 64 respondents (32 respondents in the heating pad group and 32 respondents in the infusion warmer group) selected randomly. The incidence of hypothermia was perceived from two indicators: a decrease in body temperature and the prevalence of shivering, which was observed and recorded during the intraoperative period. The data were analyzed by discrimination tests (mean discrimination test and proportion discrimination test) to determine the difference in the effectiveness of the two groups.Results: The average decrease in body temperature during the intraoperative period (0-40 minutes of operation) in the group given the infusion warmer was greater than the group given the heating pad (p<0.001). The group given the infusion warmer was 8.750 times more likely to experience shivering than the group given the heating pad (p<0.001; OR=8.750).Conclusion: Using a heating pad is better in preventing hypothermia in intraoperative patients than using an infusion warmer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加热垫与输液加热器预防术中患者体温过低:哪一种更有效?
背景:术中患者使用加热垫和输液加温器已被证明可以预防体温过低。然而,这两种方法的有效性差异尚未得到研究。目的:本研究旨在比较加热垫和输液加热器在预防术中患者体温过低(体温下降和颤抖发生率)方面的有效性。方法:本研究为准实验设计,采用非等价群的纯后验设计。本研究中的人群是区域麻醉的外科患者,共随机选择64名受访者(加热垫组32名受访者和输液加温器组32名参与者)。从两个指标可以看出体温过低的发生率:体温下降和颤抖的发生率,这两个指标在术中观察和记录。通过判别检验(平均判别检验和比例判别检验)对数据进行分析,以确定两组的有效性差异。结果:在术中期间(手术0-40分钟),给予输液加温器的组的体温平均下降幅度大于给予加热垫的组(p<0.001)。给予输液加温者发生颤抖的可能性是给予加热垫组的8.750倍(p<001;OR=8.750)与使用输液加温器相比,预防术中患者体温过低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Formulation and evaluation of antibacterial activity of hand sanitizers containing red betel (Piper crocatum) and white galangal (Alpinia galanga) extract An innovative support pillow for diabetic foot wound care In vivo study of celery (Apium graveolens L) extract for regenerating pancreatic β-cell Correlation of CD4+ levels and caspase-3 in condyloma acuminata with HIV reactive patients Butterfly hug therapy on reducing anxiety levels and stabilization hemodynamics in patient digital subtraction angiography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1