Seven-year microbiological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of burn wound infections in a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi

Vikas Singh, N. Grover, K. Tandel, Salil Jena
{"title":"Seven-year microbiological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of burn wound infections in a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi","authors":"Vikas Singh, N. Grover, K. Tandel, Salil Jena","doi":"10.4103/ijb.ijb_27_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Burn patients are vulnerable for opportunistic colonization by organisms of endogenous and exogenous origin. Hence, it is necessary to evaluate the flora obtained from wounds of burn patients to determine the most effective treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of various bacteria isolated from burn patients and to determine their antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance pattern spanning 7 years. Materials and Methods: The retrospective study included all the culture reports obtained over a period of 7 years (2012–2018). Results: Out of the total 1474 positive samples analyzed, the most common sample reported was pus (n = 816), followed by blood culture (n = 314), tissue (n = 188), and urine (n = 156). The most common organism cultured was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 377), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 309). Other commonly isolated organisms were Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 206), Escherichia coli (n = 89), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 88), Proteus mirabilis (n = 55), Burkholderia cepacia (n = 54), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 42), Candida spp. (n = 39), and Enterococci spp. (n = 36). Pseudomonas was seen to be sensitive to only colistin with resistance to all other major antibiotic classes. Klebsiella was sensitive to colistin, tigecycline, and cefoperazone/sulbactam. A. baumannii was observed to be sensitive only to colistin and tigecycline by the end of 2018 and E. coli was sensitive to amikacin, colistin, meropenem, and tigecycline. Conclusion: Antibiotic resistance is rampant, rapidly progressing and devouring down all the antibiotic classes one after other. The high antimicrobial resistance may be ascribed to the inappropriate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and lack of a definite antibiotic policy in hospitals. Treating surgeons should frequently evaluate the burn patient and run regular tests to localize the most common organisms causing the infections with their antibiotic sensitivity profiles.","PeriodicalId":13336,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of burns","volume":"30 1","pages":"18 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of burns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijb.ijb_27_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Burn patients are vulnerable for opportunistic colonization by organisms of endogenous and exogenous origin. Hence, it is necessary to evaluate the flora obtained from wounds of burn patients to determine the most effective treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of various bacteria isolated from burn patients and to determine their antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance pattern spanning 7 years. Materials and Methods: The retrospective study included all the culture reports obtained over a period of 7 years (2012–2018). Results: Out of the total 1474 positive samples analyzed, the most common sample reported was pus (n = 816), followed by blood culture (n = 314), tissue (n = 188), and urine (n = 156). The most common organism cultured was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 377), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 309). Other commonly isolated organisms were Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 206), Escherichia coli (n = 89), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 88), Proteus mirabilis (n = 55), Burkholderia cepacia (n = 54), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 42), Candida spp. (n = 39), and Enterococci spp. (n = 36). Pseudomonas was seen to be sensitive to only colistin with resistance to all other major antibiotic classes. Klebsiella was sensitive to colistin, tigecycline, and cefoperazone/sulbactam. A. baumannii was observed to be sensitive only to colistin and tigecycline by the end of 2018 and E. coli was sensitive to amikacin, colistin, meropenem, and tigecycline. Conclusion: Antibiotic resistance is rampant, rapidly progressing and devouring down all the antibiotic classes one after other. The high antimicrobial resistance may be ascribed to the inappropriate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and lack of a definite antibiotic policy in hospitals. Treating surgeons should frequently evaluate the burn patient and run regular tests to localize the most common organisms causing the infections with their antibiotic sensitivity profiles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新德里一家三级护理医院烧伤伤口感染的七年微生物学特征和抗生素敏感性模式
引言:烧伤患者易受到内源性和外源性生物体的机会性定植。因此,有必要评估烧伤患者伤口的菌群,以确定最有效的治疗方法。本研究的目的是确定从烧伤患者中分离出的各种细菌的发病率,并确定其7年的抗菌药物敏感性和耐药性模式。材料和方法:回顾性研究包括7年(2012-2018)内获得的所有培养报告。结果:在分析的1474份阳性样本中,报告的最常见样本是脓液(n=816),其次是血液培养(n=314)、组织(n=188)和尿液(n=156)。培养的最常见的生物体是铜绿假单胞菌(n=377),其次是肺炎克雷伯菌(n=309)。其他常见的分离生物有鲍曼不动杆菌(n=206)、大肠杆菌(n=89)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(n=88)、奇异变形杆菌(n=55)、洋葱伯克霍尔德菌(n=54)、金黄色葡萄球菌(n=42)、念珠菌属(n=39)和肠球菌属(n=36)。假单胞菌只对粘菌素敏感,对所有其他主要抗生素类都有耐药性。克雷伯菌对粘菌素、替加环素和头孢哌酮/舒巴坦敏感。到2018年底,鲍曼不动杆菌仅对粘菌素和替加环素敏感,大肠杆菌对阿米卡星、粘菌素、美罗培南和替加环素敏感。结论:抗生素耐药性猖獗,进展迅速,并一个接一个地吞噬了所有抗生素类别。高抗微生物耐药性可能归因于医院不适当使用广谱抗生素和缺乏明确的抗生素政策。治疗外科医生应经常评估烧伤患者,并定期进行检测,以确定导致感染的最常见生物体的抗生素敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Role of physiotherapy in acute burns Dorsal metacarpal artery perforator-based flaps for the reconstruction of postburn dorsal finger defects Burn reconstruction: Severe mentosternal adhesion Postoperative positioning following the release of neck contractures Seven-year microbiological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of burn wound infections in a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1