Owning the Libs: Symbolic Negation of #mybodymychoice as a Conservative Rhetorical Strategy

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION Communication Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10510974.2022.2163675
Alaina Walberg
{"title":"Owning the Libs: Symbolic Negation of #mybodymychoice as a Conservative Rhetorical Strategy","authors":"Alaina Walberg","doi":"10.1080/10510974.2022.2163675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The anti-vaccine movement’s appropriation of the reproductive rights mantra #MyBodyMyChoice has been remarkably successful despite overwhelming evidence in favor of vaccines and the historical precedent for vaccine requirements. I argue that this appropriation of #MyBodyMyChoice constitutes a symbolic negation which is indicative of a new conservative rhetorical strategy of Owning the Libs. This strategy emphasizes affective resonance over political reason and operates through three rhetorical moves. It first paints liberals as hypocrites while blaming them for conservatives’ own skepticism about the COVID-19 vaccine. It then elicits an affective response which manifests via right-wing arrogance and superiority on Twitter. Finally, it reconstitutes conservatives as the “true” patriots who are uniquely able to see through government corruption. This research speaks to a new form of right-wing advocacy that forefronts emotion and personal experience as the basis for group formation and sidesteps traditional political and deliberative norms.","PeriodicalId":47080,"journal":{"name":"Communication Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"29 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2022.2163675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The anti-vaccine movement’s appropriation of the reproductive rights mantra #MyBodyMyChoice has been remarkably successful despite overwhelming evidence in favor of vaccines and the historical precedent for vaccine requirements. I argue that this appropriation of #MyBodyMyChoice constitutes a symbolic negation which is indicative of a new conservative rhetorical strategy of Owning the Libs. This strategy emphasizes affective resonance over political reason and operates through three rhetorical moves. It first paints liberals as hypocrites while blaming them for conservatives’ own skepticism about the COVID-19 vaccine. It then elicits an affective response which manifests via right-wing arrogance and superiority on Twitter. Finally, it reconstitutes conservatives as the “true” patriots who are uniquely able to see through government corruption. This research speaks to a new form of right-wing advocacy that forefronts emotion and personal experience as the basis for group formation and sidesteps traditional political and deliberative norms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拥有Libs:#mybodymychoice作为保守修辞策略的象征性否定
摘要尽管有压倒性的证据支持疫苗以及疫苗要求的历史先例,但反疫苗运动对生殖权利口号#MyBodyMyChoice的挪用取得了显著成功。我认为,这种对#MyBodyMyChoice的挪用构成了一种象征性的否定,这表明了一种新的保守修辞策略“拥有自由”。这种策略强调情感共鸣而非政治理性,并通过三个修辞动作来运作。它首先把自由主义者描绘成伪君子,同时指责他们是保守主义者自己对新冠肺炎疫苗的怀疑。然后,它引发了一种情感反应,这种反应通过右翼在推特上的傲慢和优越感表现出来。最后,它将保守派重塑为“真正的”爱国者,他们独特地能够看穿政府腐败。这项研究谈到了一种新的右翼倡导形式,它将情感和个人经历作为群体形成的基础,并避开了传统的政治和审议规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Studies
Communication Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Communicative Ecologies of Displaced Youth Ways of Connecting in Protracted Situations of Encampment Editorial for the Special Issue: “Communication Research on Coping Strategies During Global Crises” Mediated Contact with LGBTQ Characters: Associations Between Recognizability, Parasocial Friendship, Wishful Identification, and LGBTQ Prejudice Closing the Gaps: An Examination of Student Self-Sabotage, a Willingness to Ask for Help, and Personal-Enacted and Enacted-Relational Identity Gaps in the Student-Instructor Relationship Media Network and Citizen Journalism: The Transition from Agenda Setting to Agenda Loop
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1