The development outcomes of remittance inflows to Nigeria: the case of the Southeastern Geo-political zone

William M. Fonta, E. Nwosu, D. Thiam, E. Ayuk
{"title":"The development outcomes of remittance inflows to Nigeria: the case of the Southeastern Geo-political zone","authors":"William M. Fonta, E. Nwosu, D. Thiam, E. Ayuk","doi":"10.1080/21632324.2020.1866879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Remittances to Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) constitute a critical lifeline for millions of individual households. It is on record that these large transfers enable recipient households to raise their living standards beyond vulnerability and subsistence levels. Unfortunately, the development potentials of remittance income are seldom factored into most pro-poor targeting programmes in many SSA countries like Nigeria. This is largely due to the problems of data inconsistency as well as those related to lack of precise information on how remittances are received and spent. Using novel survey dataset involving 450 remittance recipient and non-recipient households collected in the Southeast Geopolitical Zone of Nigeria, the study uncovers significant evidence of the impact of remittances on household expenditure and povertyusingpropensityscore matching (PSM). Specifically, households that receive remittances invest between NGN186,000 (US$1,240) and NGN205,000 (US$1,366.7) more in building constructions, land acquisitions and also invest over NGN60,000 (US$400) more in household business enterprise compared to non-recipient households. Similarly, the estimated impact of remittances on poverty shows that household poverty is lower by between 30.3% and 33.6% considering the results from all the three PSM matching estimators. The differences between the recipients and non-recipients are statistically significant. The implications of the findings are discussed in terms of pro-poor targeting programmes in Nigeria.","PeriodicalId":74195,"journal":{"name":"Migration and development","volume":"11 1","pages":"1087 - 1103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21632324.2020.1866879","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Migration and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2020.1866879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Remittances to Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) constitute a critical lifeline for millions of individual households. It is on record that these large transfers enable recipient households to raise their living standards beyond vulnerability and subsistence levels. Unfortunately, the development potentials of remittance income are seldom factored into most pro-poor targeting programmes in many SSA countries like Nigeria. This is largely due to the problems of data inconsistency as well as those related to lack of precise information on how remittances are received and spent. Using novel survey dataset involving 450 remittance recipient and non-recipient households collected in the Southeast Geopolitical Zone of Nigeria, the study uncovers significant evidence of the impact of remittances on household expenditure and povertyusingpropensityscore matching (PSM). Specifically, households that receive remittances invest between NGN186,000 (US$1,240) and NGN205,000 (US$1,366.7) more in building constructions, land acquisitions and also invest over NGN60,000 (US$400) more in household business enterprise compared to non-recipient households. Similarly, the estimated impact of remittances on poverty shows that household poverty is lower by between 30.3% and 33.6% considering the results from all the three PSM matching estimators. The differences between the recipients and non-recipients are statistically significant. The implications of the findings are discussed in terms of pro-poor targeting programmes in Nigeria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流入尼日利亚的汇款的发展结果:东南地缘政治区的情况
摘要:向撒哈拉以南非洲汇款是数百万家庭的重要生命线。有记录表明,这些大额转移使受援家庭能够将生活水平提高到脆弱性和生存水平之外。不幸的是,在尼日利亚等许多撒哈拉以南非洲国家,汇款收入的发展潜力很少被纳入大多数扶贫方案。这在很大程度上是由于数据不一致的问题,以及与缺乏关于汇款接收和使用方式的准确信息有关的问题。利用尼日利亚东南地缘政治区收集的涉及450个汇款接受者和非汇款接受者家庭的新调查数据集,该研究使用倾向核心匹配(PSM)揭示了汇款对家庭支出和贫困影响的重要证据。具体而言,与非汇款家庭相比,收到汇款的家庭在建筑建设和土地收购方面的投资增加了86000 NGN186000(1240美元)至105000 NGN205000(1366.7美元),在家庭企业方面的投资也增加了60000 NGN6000(400美元)。同样,汇款对贫困的估计影响表明,考虑到所有三个PSM匹配估计的结果,家庭贫困率降低了30.3%至33.6%。接受者和非接受者之间的差异具有统计学意义。从尼日利亚扶贫方案的角度讨论了调查结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Migration on Time Use Pattern of Left-Behind Male and Female in Rural Bangladesh International Student Mobility in the Context of Migration and Development Europe and Arab States’ Migration-related Instruments with Africa: Dilemma of Soft Power and Conflictual Interests Book review: AKM Ahsan Ullah and Diotima Chattoraj, The Unheard Stories of The Rohingyas: Ethnicity, Diversity, and Media Shades of Homogeneity: Redefining Japan’s Narrative Through Refugee Acceptance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1