“Digital Taylorism” for some, “digital self-determination” for others? Inequality in job autonomy across different task domains

S. Kirchner, S. Meyer, A. Tisch
{"title":"“Digital Taylorism” for some, “digital self-determination” for others? Inequality in job autonomy across different task domains","authors":"S. Kirchner, S. Meyer, A. Tisch","doi":"10.1515/zsr-2022-0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In interdisciplinary debates, it is often assumed that changes in job autonomy in the course of digitalisation will be similar for all employees, even across task domains. Some authors postulate the emergence of a “digital Taylorism”, while others suggest that the digital transformation enables more “digital self-determination”. Based on a large-scale survey of employees in Germany, this article quantitatively examines both assumptions, with a particular focus on possible differences across job tasks. The results point to a systematic inequality between the task domains considered: Knowledge-related tasks seem to be associated with increased “digital self-determination”, while the results for manufacturing and service tasks tend towards a pattern of “digital Taylorism”. Overall, the debate needs to go beyond discussing possible future scenarios and address the complex links between job quality, digital technologies and tasks that are already changing the world of work today.","PeriodicalId":83585,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","volume":"69 1","pages":"57 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2022-0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract In interdisciplinary debates, it is often assumed that changes in job autonomy in the course of digitalisation will be similar for all employees, even across task domains. Some authors postulate the emergence of a “digital Taylorism”, while others suggest that the digital transformation enables more “digital self-determination”. Based on a large-scale survey of employees in Germany, this article quantitatively examines both assumptions, with a particular focus on possible differences across job tasks. The results point to a systematic inequality between the task domains considered: Knowledge-related tasks seem to be associated with increased “digital self-determination”, while the results for manufacturing and service tasks tend towards a pattern of “digital Taylorism”. Overall, the debate needs to go beyond discussing possible future scenarios and address the complex links between job quality, digital technologies and tasks that are already changing the world of work today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对一些人来说是“数字泰勒主义”,对另一些人来说是“数字自决”?不同任务领域的工作自主权不平等
摘要在跨学科的辩论中,人们通常认为数字化过程中工作自主性的变化对所有员工来说都是相似的,即使是在不同的任务领域。一些作者认为“数字泰勒主义”的出现,而另一些作者则认为数字转型能够实现更多的“数字自决”。基于对德国员工的大规模调查,本文对这两种假设进行了定量研究,特别关注不同工作任务之间可能存在的差异。研究结果表明,所考虑的任务领域之间存在系统性的不平等:与知识相关的任务似乎与增强的“数字自决”有关,而制造和服务任务的结果则倾向于“数字泰勒主义”模式。总的来说,这场辩论需要超越讨论未来可能出现的情况,并解决工作质量、数字技术和任务之间的复杂联系,这些联系已经在改变当今的工作世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eine Analyse zukünftiger Alterseinkommen im Lichte des Drei-Schichten-Modells: Zum Status quo der Altersvorsorge heutiger Generationen Neue Wege zu sozialen Rechten? Digitale Märkte für Rechtsdienstleistungen in Deutschland Interaktion im Schatten der Hierarchie: Zwang und Zusammenarbeit in Jobcentern Umverteilung im deutschen Wohlfahrtsstaat: Familie zwischen gewährten und eingeforderten Ressourcen News Coverage of Mental Health in Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic – An Analysis of the German Press Landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1