Power, Freedom, and Privacy on a Discipline-and-Control Facebook, and the Implications for Internet Governance

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1109/TPC.2022.3191103
Ming Cheung;Zhen Troy Chen
{"title":"Power, Freedom, and Privacy on a Discipline-and-Control Facebook, and the Implications for Internet Governance","authors":"Ming Cheung;Zhen Troy Chen","doi":"10.1109/TPC.2022.3191103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<bold>Background:</b>\n The proliferation and penetration of social media into professional and everyday lives have reshaped the way in which people deal with their personal information and call for refreshed perceptions and conceptualizations of the power relationship between individual users and technology giants. Despite intensified privacy concerns and crises over social media, there is little research on the correlations between users’ privacy perception and protection in non-Western settings. \n<bold>Research question:</b>\n To what extent are Hong Kong Facebook users willing to sacrifice control over their information in exchange for self-expression, sociality, and intimacy in their social roles and relationships? \n<bold>Literature review:</b>\n We first identified a gap in the literature on user perceptions and concerns over privacy in Eastern cultures, which is scarce despite the increasing concern over privacy in professional communication. Informed by the recent literature on the privacy paradox and Foucault and Deleuze's work on power, the unbalanced and normalizing power relationship between Facebook and its users in Eastern contexts is identified as a synthesis of discipline and control. \n<bold>Research methodology:</b>\n Data from a survey of 797 young users in Hong Kong were used for our analysis of privacy perception and protection. The survey contained three sections: Facebook usage, attitudes and behaviors, and basic demographics. \n<bold>Results:</b>\n The findings support our hypotheses in revealing that the privacy paradox is evident for Facebook users in Hong Kong. In addition, excessive Facebook use leads to reactive privacy awareness and normalization behaviors. \n<bold>Conclusion:</b>\n We believe that technology giants, such as Facebook, should be pioneers in safeguarding users’ privacy while encouraging the establishment of social relationships and freedom of expression. The implications for internet governance are discussed from a multistakeholder perspective.","PeriodicalId":46950,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","volume":"65 4","pages":"467-484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9933926/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The proliferation and penetration of social media into professional and everyday lives have reshaped the way in which people deal with their personal information and call for refreshed perceptions and conceptualizations of the power relationship between individual users and technology giants. Despite intensified privacy concerns and crises over social media, there is little research on the correlations between users’ privacy perception and protection in non-Western settings. Research question: To what extent are Hong Kong Facebook users willing to sacrifice control over their information in exchange for self-expression, sociality, and intimacy in their social roles and relationships? Literature review: We first identified a gap in the literature on user perceptions and concerns over privacy in Eastern cultures, which is scarce despite the increasing concern over privacy in professional communication. Informed by the recent literature on the privacy paradox and Foucault and Deleuze's work on power, the unbalanced and normalizing power relationship between Facebook and its users in Eastern contexts is identified as a synthesis of discipline and control. Research methodology: Data from a survey of 797 young users in Hong Kong were used for our analysis of privacy perception and protection. The survey contained three sections: Facebook usage, attitudes and behaviors, and basic demographics. Results: The findings support our hypotheses in revealing that the privacy paradox is evident for Facebook users in Hong Kong. In addition, excessive Facebook use leads to reactive privacy awareness and normalization behaviors. Conclusion: We believe that technology giants, such as Facebook, should be pioneers in safeguarding users’ privacy while encouraging the establishment of social relationships and freedom of expression. The implications for internet governance are discussed from a multistakeholder perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规训与控制的Facebook中的权力、自由和隐私,以及对互联网治理的启示
背景:社交媒体在职业和日常生活中的扩散和渗透重塑了人们处理个人信息的方式,并呼吁对个人用户和科技巨头之间的权力关系进行全新的认知和概念化。尽管社交媒体加剧了对隐私的担忧和危机,但很少有研究表明用户的隐私感知与非西方环境中的保护之间的相关性。研究问题:香港Facebook用户在多大程度上愿意牺牲对信息的控制,以换取他们在社会角色和关系中的自我表达、社会性和亲密感?文献综述:我们首先发现了东方文化中关于用户对隐私的看法和担忧的文献中的一个空白,尽管在专业交流中对隐私的担忧越来越大,但这一空白并不多见。根据最近关于隐私悖论的文献以及福柯和德勒兹关于权力的工作,在东方背景下,脸书与其用户之间不平衡和正常化的权力关系被认为是纪律和控制的综合。研究方法:我们使用香港797名年轻用户的调查数据来分析隐私感知和保护。该调查包括三个部分:脸书的使用、态度和行为,以及基本的人口统计数据。结果:研究结果支持了我们的假设,揭示了香港Facebook用户的隐私悖论是显而易见的。此外,过度使用Facebook会导致被动的隐私意识和正常化行为。结论:我们认为,像脸书这样的科技巨头应该成为保护用户隐私的先驱,同时鼓励建立社会关系和言论自由。从多方利益相关者的角度讨论了对互联网治理的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to applied research on professional communication—including but not limited to technical and business communication. Papers should address the research interests and needs of technical communicators, engineers, scientists, information designers, editors, linguists, translators, managers, business professionals, and others from around the globe who practice, conduct research on, and teach others about effective professional communication. The Transactions publishes original, empirical research that addresses one of these contexts: The communication practices of technical professionals, such as engineers and scientists The practices of professional communicators who work in technical or business environments Evidence-based methods for teaching and practicing professional and technical communication.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents IEEE Professional Communication Society Information IEEE Professional Communication Society Information IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Information for Authors Getting it Wrong: Student Estimations of Time and the Number of Drafts in Linked Computer Science and Technical Communication Courses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1