Distant and Close: Research Into Transactional Analysis Psychotherapy Online

Diego Rocco, Evita Cassoni, G. Dell'Arciprete
{"title":"Distant and Close: Research Into Transactional Analysis Psychotherapy Online","authors":"Diego Rocco, Evita Cassoni, G. Dell'Arciprete","doi":"10.1080/03621537.2023.2213972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In recent years, especially in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have witnessed a partial transition in the field of psychotherapy from in-person settings to remote ones (i.e., online therapy). This trend has raised the question of whether the two settings are interchangeable. With the research described here, the authors explore, within a transactional analysis theoretical framework, whether the therapeutic impact of in-person sessions, assessed by both patients and therapists, is different from that perceived with a remote setting. Using the Session Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ), 20 transactional analysis psychotherapists and their patients evaluated the impact of two pairs of sessions—one in person and one online—for a total of 160 SEQs. The data were then analyzed through t-tests to verify the research hypotheses. For therapists only, the impact of remote sessions was perceived to be lower than that of in-person sessions. The implications are discussed from a clinical point of view.","PeriodicalId":37049,"journal":{"name":"Transactional Analysis Journal","volume":"53 1","pages":"270 - 285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactional Analysis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03621537.2023.2213972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, especially in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have witnessed a partial transition in the field of psychotherapy from in-person settings to remote ones (i.e., online therapy). This trend has raised the question of whether the two settings are interchangeable. With the research described here, the authors explore, within a transactional analysis theoretical framework, whether the therapeutic impact of in-person sessions, assessed by both patients and therapists, is different from that perceived with a remote setting. Using the Session Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ), 20 transactional analysis psychotherapists and their patients evaluated the impact of two pairs of sessions—one in person and one online—for a total of 160 SEQs. The data were then analyzed through t-tests to verify the research hypotheses. For therapists only, the impact of remote sessions was perceived to be lower than that of in-person sessions. The implications are discussed from a clinical point of view.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远与近:交易分析心理治疗在线研究
近年来,特别是在新冠肺炎大流行时代,我们见证了心理治疗领域从面对面到远程(即网络治疗)的部分过渡。这一趋势引发了一个问题,即这两种设定是否可以互换。通过本文所述的研究,作者在交易分析理论框架内探索,由患者和治疗师评估的面对面会议的治疗效果是否与远程设置的治疗效果不同。使用会话评估问卷(SEQ), 20名交易分析心理治疗师和他们的病人评估了两对会话的影响——一组面对面的,一组在线的——总共160个SEQ。然后通过t检验对数据进行分析,以验证研究假设。仅对于治疗师而言,远程会议的影响被认为低于面对面会议。从临床的角度讨论其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transactional Analysis Journal
Transactional Analysis Journal Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Affinity Continuum: Toward Professional Autonomy Being in Charge: A Quest to Embrace the Role of Both Feminine and Masculine Energies in Leadership, Leaving Duality Behind The Impact of Attachment on Leadership in Organizations System Imago: A New Perspective on Leadership and Power Leadership, Intersectionality, and Feminism: Radical-Relational Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1