PERSON–SKILL FIT: WHY A NEW FORM OF EMPLOYEE FIT IS REQUIRED

IF 7.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Academy of Management Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI:10.5465/amp.2022-0024
Hila Chalutz Ben-Gal
{"title":"PERSON–SKILL FIT: WHY A NEW FORM OF EMPLOYEE FIT IS REQUIRED","authors":"Hila Chalutz Ben-Gal","doi":"10.5465/amp.2022-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significant recent changes in labor affect organizations, managers, and employees; we do not yet fully understand the depth and scope of these changes. For example, although previous research on person – job and person – organization fit is helpful, it has struggled to provide clarity when the very nature of work and jobs is changing and new types of work are emerging. To contribute to the literature on person – job and person – organization fit, this paper proposes a conceptual model that explains the ways in which individual, job, and organizational factors interact with diverse work environments. Specifically, I show that a new work environment generates a new form of employee fit, which I call “ person – skill fit. ” I argue that changes in the constructs that contribute to employee fit (e.g., competencies, trust, commitment, and values) may generate a fit gap that manifests in the form of a managerial gap. Firms should address this gap to improve their dynamic alignment with new forms of work. This framework offers potentially valuable new ways of assisting managers and organizations in their efforts to adjust to the changing nature of work and to transition from standard management practices to new management practices to achieve improved outcomes by utilizing the person – skill fit model.","PeriodicalId":48215,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2022-0024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Significant recent changes in labor affect organizations, managers, and employees; we do not yet fully understand the depth and scope of these changes. For example, although previous research on person – job and person – organization fit is helpful, it has struggled to provide clarity when the very nature of work and jobs is changing and new types of work are emerging. To contribute to the literature on person – job and person – organization fit, this paper proposes a conceptual model that explains the ways in which individual, job, and organizational factors interact with diverse work environments. Specifically, I show that a new work environment generates a new form of employee fit, which I call “ person – skill fit. ” I argue that changes in the constructs that contribute to employee fit (e.g., competencies, trust, commitment, and values) may generate a fit gap that manifests in the form of a managerial gap. Firms should address this gap to improve their dynamic alignment with new forms of work. This framework offers potentially valuable new ways of assisting managers and organizations in their efforts to adjust to the changing nature of work and to transition from standard management practices to new management practices to achieve improved outcomes by utilizing the person – skill fit model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人技能匹配:为什么需要一种新的员工匹配形式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Academy of Management Perspectives (AMP) aims to provide valuable insights to current and future thought leaders, including educators, business writers, consultants, executives, policy makers, and other professionals involved in management practice and policy. The publication seeks to bridge the gap between scholarly research and practical applications by presenting evidence-based approaches to address crucial management issues. AMP publishes research papers that employ quantitative or qualitative evidence, either from a single study or a compilation of studies within a specific field of research. The journal does not accept opinion pieces but encourages articles that focus on the implications of findings for policy and practice rather than theoretical implications. Examples of suitable articles for publication in AMP include practitioner or policy-oriented reviews of empirical studies, descriptive articles that contribute to our comprehension of management practices and strategic approaches, and articles highlighting the practical and policy implications of evidence-based work.
期刊最新文献
The End of Jobs? Paradoxes of Job Deconstruction in Organizations Dealing with Organizational Legacies of Irresponsibility A Puzzle of Knowledge Spillovers during Patent Litigation Rethinking “Woke” and “Integrative” Diversity Strategies: Diversity, Equity, Inclusion—and Inequality Creating Value through Supply Chain Orchestration as a Business Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1