Senior High School Biology Teachers’ Perception towards Evolution Learning

Pub Date : 2019-11-29 DOI:10.30870/jppi.v5i2.3335
R. Darussyamsu, Resma Wahyuni, R. Fitri, M. Fadilah, D. Putri, M. Mukhtar
{"title":"Senior High School Biology Teachers’ Perception towards Evolution Learning","authors":"R. Darussyamsu, Resma Wahyuni, R. Fitri, M. Fadilah, D. Putri, M. Mukhtar","doi":"10.30870/jppi.v5i2.3335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers’ perception of a particular material is an influential aspect of the way teachers learn the material.  Since evolution is a debating material, teachers affected by this condition when they teaching the evolutionary topic. For those reasons, this descriptive study aimed to identify teachers’ perception of evolution learning, which consists of four main aspects: learning material, strategy, sources, and assessment. The population is all biology teachers at Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia. Sampling was taken by purposive sampling, with criteria biology teachers that already taught the evolutionary topic in senior high school. Data collected from the questionnaire and analyzed descriptively in percentage. The result showed that for the majority of biology teachers at Padang have perceptions toward four aspects of evolution learning in a category very good, good, and good enough. In details, more concerns are needed for some less valued descriptor related to the contradiction issue between evolution theory and Islamic beliefs. In the average, each score of perception for four aspects are: learning material 3.71; strategies 4.11; sources 3.64; and assessment 3.92 with all average criteria in good category. Each aspect performed is discussed.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v5i2.3335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Teachers’ perception of a particular material is an influential aspect of the way teachers learn the material.  Since evolution is a debating material, teachers affected by this condition when they teaching the evolutionary topic. For those reasons, this descriptive study aimed to identify teachers’ perception of evolution learning, which consists of four main aspects: learning material, strategy, sources, and assessment. The population is all biology teachers at Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia. Sampling was taken by purposive sampling, with criteria biology teachers that already taught the evolutionary topic in senior high school. Data collected from the questionnaire and analyzed descriptively in percentage. The result showed that for the majority of biology teachers at Padang have perceptions toward four aspects of evolution learning in a category very good, good, and good enough. In details, more concerns are needed for some less valued descriptor related to the contradiction issue between evolution theory and Islamic beliefs. In the average, each score of perception for four aspects are: learning material 3.71; strategies 4.11; sources 3.64; and assessment 3.92 with all average criteria in good category. Each aspect performed is discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
高中生物教师对进化学习的认知
教师对特定材料的感知是影响教师学习材料方式的一个方面。由于进化论是一种辩论材料,教师在教授进化论话题时会受到这种情况的影响。基于这些原因,本描述性研究旨在确定教师对进化学习的感知,进化学习包括四个主要方面:学习材料、策略、来源和评估。人口都是印尼苏门答腊岛巴东的生物教师。抽样是通过有目的的抽样进行的,标准是高中就已经教授进化主题的生物学老师。从问卷中收集的数据,并以百分比进行描述性分析。结果表明,对于巴东的大多数生物教师来说,他们对进化学习的四个方面有着非常好、良好和足够好的看法。在细节上,需要更多的关注与进化论和伊斯兰信仰之间的矛盾问题有关的一些价值较低的描述符。平均而言,四个方面的感知得分分别为:学习材料3.71分;战略4.11;来源3.64;评估3.92,所有平均标准均为良好类别。讨论了执行的每个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1