The effects of building and maintaining rapport on cooperative mock eyewitness recall

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling Pub Date : 2022-02-25 DOI:10.1002/jip.1586
Andrea C. F. Wolfs, Danielle Sneyd, Jonathan P. Vallano, Nadja Schreiber Compo, Leanett Reinoso
{"title":"The effects of building and maintaining rapport on cooperative mock eyewitness recall","authors":"Andrea C. F. Wolfs,&nbsp;Danielle Sneyd,&nbsp;Jonathan P. Vallano,&nbsp;Nadja Schreiber Compo,&nbsp;Leanett Reinoso","doi":"10.1002/jip.1586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although building rapport before an investigative interview is recommended—and sometimes empirically beneficial—to eyewitness memory, no research has experimentally examined the effects of <i>maintaining</i> rapport during a witness interview on adult eyewitness recall. As a result, the present study assessed the impact of rapport on eyewitness recall accuracy by comparing a <i>pre-interview rapport only</i> condition with a <i>maintained rapport</i> condition (where rapport was built before and maintained during the interview) and a <i>no rapport control</i> condition. Results revealed no benefits (or detriments) of building initial rapport—or any additional benefits of maintaining rapport—on witness recall quality, quantity, or ‘don't know’ responses. Our findings suggest that rapport or its maintenance may not directly affect eyewitness recall. However, as rapport is a humane eyewitness interviewing technique with some empirical support, we still advocate for its continued use.</p>","PeriodicalId":46397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jip.1586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Although building rapport before an investigative interview is recommended—and sometimes empirically beneficial—to eyewitness memory, no research has experimentally examined the effects of maintaining rapport during a witness interview on adult eyewitness recall. As a result, the present study assessed the impact of rapport on eyewitness recall accuracy by comparing a pre-interview rapport only condition with a maintained rapport condition (where rapport was built before and maintained during the interview) and a no rapport control condition. Results revealed no benefits (or detriments) of building initial rapport—or any additional benefits of maintaining rapport—on witness recall quality, quantity, or ‘don't know’ responses. Our findings suggest that rapport or its maintenance may not directly affect eyewitness recall. However, as rapport is a humane eyewitness interviewing technique with some empirical support, we still advocate for its continued use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立和维持融洽关系对合作模拟目击者回忆的影响
虽然在调查采访前建立融洽的关系是被推荐的——有时在经验上是有益的——对目击者的记忆来说,没有研究在实验中检验在证人采访期间保持融洽关系对成年目击者回忆的影响。因此,本研究评估了融洽关系对目击者回忆准确性的影响,方法是通过比较采访前只有融洽关系的条件、保持融洽关系的条件(在采访前建立并在采访期间保持融洽关系)和没有融洽关系的控制条件。结果显示,在证人回忆的质量、数量或“不知道”回答方面,建立最初的融洽关系或维持融洽关系没有任何好处(或坏处)。我们的研究结果表明,融洽关系或其维持可能不会直接影响目击者的回忆。然而,由于融洽是一种人性化的目击者访谈技术,并有一些经验支持,我们仍然主张继续使用它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling (JIP-OP) is an international journal of behavioural science contributions to criminal and civil investigations, for researchers and practitioners, also exploring the legal and jurisprudential implications of psychological and related aspects of all forms of investigation. Investigative Psychology is rapidly developing worldwide. It is a newly established, interdisciplinary area of research and application, concerned with the systematic, scientific examination of all those aspects of psychology and the related behavioural and social sciences that may be relevant to criminal.
期刊最新文献
The resister, the talker and the confessor: A closer look at suspect responses in investigative interviews Mental pathology in the field of personality and psychotic disorders, systematic review of its relationship with the commission of homicide and violent acts Cognitive interview conducted in‐person and over‐the‐phone for informants' memory of overheard conversations Issue Information The charade of discreetness: Exploring the paradoxical lifestyles of romance fraudsters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1