The City as an Onion? Case Studies of Electoral Geography in Prague and Warsaw

Daniel Kerekes
{"title":"The City as an Onion? Case Studies of Electoral Geography in Prague and Warsaw","authors":"Daniel Kerekes","doi":"10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.3.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The City as an Onion? Case Studies of Electoral Geography in Prague and Warsaw. Electoral geographical research into urban territories shows a distinction in voting behaviour between a city centre and its surroundings. A recent exploratory study of the electoral geography of Prague found that distance from the city centre was the variable that best explained the spatial variation of votes, which might follow a concentric pattern and, thus, it recommended seeking a theoretical explanation in urban sociology, e.g. in the Burgess model of the city. Following this recommendation, I compared spatial patterns of voting behaviour in two cities – Warsaw and Prague. Using component analysis, I reduced the number of analysed variables to one for each city representing the main spatial polarisation. In Prague, voting behaviour showed a distinction between the city centre, inner suburbs and outer suburbs. While the city centre and the outer suburbs were conservative, the inner suburbs tended to vote for the left. This partially follows the Burgess model. On the other hand, the electoral geography of Warsaw showed a different structure. In this article I present a way of visualising urban electoral data in maps that avoid distortion caused by varying polygon size. Sociológia 2020, Vol. 52 (No. 3: 245-272) https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.3.11","PeriodicalId":35251,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.3.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The City as an Onion? Case Studies of Electoral Geography in Prague and Warsaw. Electoral geographical research into urban territories shows a distinction in voting behaviour between a city centre and its surroundings. A recent exploratory study of the electoral geography of Prague found that distance from the city centre was the variable that best explained the spatial variation of votes, which might follow a concentric pattern and, thus, it recommended seeking a theoretical explanation in urban sociology, e.g. in the Burgess model of the city. Following this recommendation, I compared spatial patterns of voting behaviour in two cities – Warsaw and Prague. Using component analysis, I reduced the number of analysed variables to one for each city representing the main spatial polarisation. In Prague, voting behaviour showed a distinction between the city centre, inner suburbs and outer suburbs. While the city centre and the outer suburbs were conservative, the inner suburbs tended to vote for the left. This partially follows the Burgess model. On the other hand, the electoral geography of Warsaw showed a different structure. In this article I present a way of visualising urban electoral data in maps that avoid distortion caused by varying polygon size. Sociológia 2020, Vol. 52 (No. 3: 245-272) https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.3.11
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
像洋葱一样的城市?布拉格和华沙选举地理个案研究
像洋葱一样的城市?布拉格和华沙选举地理案例研究。对城市地区的选举地理研究表明,市中心及其周边地区的投票行为存在差异。最近对布拉格选举地理的一项探索性研究发现,距离市中心的距离是最能解释选票空间变化的变量,选票空间变化可能遵循同心模式,因此,它建议在城市社会学中寻求理论解释,例如在城市的伯吉斯模型中。根据这一建议,我比较了华沙和布拉格两个城市的投票行为空间模式。使用成分分析,我将分析的变量数量减少到每个城市一个,代表主要的空间两极分化。在布拉格,投票行为显示出市中心、内郊和远郊之间的区别。虽然市中心和远郊是保守的,但内郊倾向于投票给左翼。这部分遵循了Burgess模型。另一方面,华沙的选举地理呈现出不同的结构。在这篇文章中,我提出了一种在地图中可视化城市选举数据的方法,以避免因多边形大小不同而造成的失真。《社会学2020》,第52卷(第3期:245-272)https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.3.11
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas
Sociologia, Problemas e Praticas Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Against Accumulation: Class Traitors Challenge Wealth and Worth Excess Profits, Taxpayer-Subsidized Philanthropy, and the Coronavirus Crisis: Charitable Giving of the Tech Elite in Response to the Pandemic Lucy Suchman in Conversation with Ana Gross Gender and wealth in the super rich: asset differences in top wealth households in the United States, 1989–2019 Risk Mismatches and Inequalities: Oil and Gas and Elite Risk-Classes in the U.S. and Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1