{"title":"La politique étrangère des États‐Unis","authors":"Louis Balthazar, C. David, J. Vaisse, L. Lüthi","doi":"10.3917/scpo.david.2022.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fondements, acteurs, formulationCharles-Philippe David, Louis Balthazar, and Justin VaisseParis: Presses de Sciences Po, 2003, 382pp, 29.80 paper (ISBN 2-7246-0919-0)At a time when it seems that the leaders of the United States and France have lost their good manners and common sense over Iraq, it is reassuring that a French press is capable of publishing a book on US foreign policy devoid of the current polemical debate on alleged American arrogance in international affairs or supposedly traditional French intransigence. This is certainly intrinsically linked to the choice of the three co-authors: two senior francophone Canadian scholars based at the Observatoire sur les Etats-Unis de l'Universite du Quebec a Montreal and one French historian with research interests in US foreign affairs, French anti-Americanism and US francophobia.The book succeeds well in its obvious purpose of providing students and the interested lay audience with a concise and comprehensive overview of the foundations and the formulation of US foreign policy since the American Revolution. The co-authors chose wisely to depart from the format, traditional in the English-speaking world, of narrating US foreign policy in presidential chapters or as a clash between idealism and realism. Instead, they have opted to divide the book into three thematic parts consisting of three or four chapters each.The first part--foundations--covers the constitutional basis for the conduct of foreign relations, the national style, the great political arguments since 1776 and modern academic interpretations. This section, which comprehensively discusses the various academic interpretations of US foreign relations in short and concise sketches (including a very useful overview table), impressed this reviewer in particular and will prove helpful to students at the start of their studies of US foreign relations or political science. The second part--agents--covers not only core topics such as the presidency but also the internal structures and role of the bureaucracies in the foreign policy process. The inclusion of the Department of Homeland Security serves as a great example of the book's relevance to current affairs. However, this reviewer would have preferred to see the discussion of that particular department in the context of the National Security Council, which is extensively covered in its own chapter, and of the history of the rise of the national security state since 1945. …","PeriodicalId":46226,"journal":{"name":"International Journal","volume":"59 1","pages":"233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/scpo.david.2022.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Fondements, acteurs, formulationCharles-Philippe David, Louis Balthazar, and Justin VaisseParis: Presses de Sciences Po, 2003, 382pp, 29.80 paper (ISBN 2-7246-0919-0)At a time when it seems that the leaders of the United States and France have lost their good manners and common sense over Iraq, it is reassuring that a French press is capable of publishing a book on US foreign policy devoid of the current polemical debate on alleged American arrogance in international affairs or supposedly traditional French intransigence. This is certainly intrinsically linked to the choice of the three co-authors: two senior francophone Canadian scholars based at the Observatoire sur les Etats-Unis de l'Universite du Quebec a Montreal and one French historian with research interests in US foreign affairs, French anti-Americanism and US francophobia.The book succeeds well in its obvious purpose of providing students and the interested lay audience with a concise and comprehensive overview of the foundations and the formulation of US foreign policy since the American Revolution. The co-authors chose wisely to depart from the format, traditional in the English-speaking world, of narrating US foreign policy in presidential chapters or as a clash between idealism and realism. Instead, they have opted to divide the book into three thematic parts consisting of three or four chapters each.The first part--foundations--covers the constitutional basis for the conduct of foreign relations, the national style, the great political arguments since 1776 and modern academic interpretations. This section, which comprehensively discusses the various academic interpretations of US foreign relations in short and concise sketches (including a very useful overview table), impressed this reviewer in particular and will prove helpful to students at the start of their studies of US foreign relations or political science. The second part--agents--covers not only core topics such as the presidency but also the internal structures and role of the bureaucracies in the foreign policy process. The inclusion of the Department of Homeland Security serves as a great example of the book's relevance to current affairs. However, this reviewer would have preferred to see the discussion of that particular department in the context of the National Security Council, which is extensively covered in its own chapter, and of the history of the rise of the national security state since 1945. …
基金会、演员、演职人员:查尔斯·菲利普·大卫、路易斯·巴尔萨泽和贾斯汀·维斯里斯:巴黎政治学院出版社,2003年,382页,29.80页(ISBN 2-7246-0919-0)在美国和法国领导人似乎在伊拉克问题上失去了礼貌和常识的时候,令人放心的是,法国出版社能够出版一本关于美国外交政策的书,而不是目前关于美国在国际事务中所谓的傲慢或所谓的传统法国不妥协的辩论。这当然与三位合著者的选择有着内在的联系:两位供职于蒙特利尔魁北克大学国家观察站(Observatoire sur les etatres - unis de l’university du Quebec)的资深法语加拿大学者,以及一位研究美国外交事务、法国反美主义和美国法语恐惧症的法国历史学家。这本书成功地为学生和感兴趣的外行读者提供了美国独立战争以来美国外交政策的基础和制定的简明而全面的概述。两位合著者明智地选择摒弃了英语世界的传统形式,即在总统章节中叙述美国外交政策,或将其作为理想主义与现实主义之间的冲突。相反,他们选择将这本书分成三个主题部分,每个部分由三到四个章节组成。第一部分——基础——涵盖了外交行为的宪法基础、民族风格、1776年以来的重大政治争论和现代学术解释。这一节以简短而简洁的概述(包括一个非常有用的概述表)全面讨论了对美国外交关系的各种学术解释,给这位评论家留下了特别深刻的印象,并将证明对刚开始学习美国外交关系或政治学的学生很有帮助。第二部分——代理人——不仅涵盖了总统职位等核心话题,还涵盖了官僚机构在外交政策过程中的内部结构和作用。国土安全部(Department of Homeland Security)的加入是这本书与时事相关的一个很好的例子。然而,本评论家更希望看到在国家安全委员会的背景下讨论这个特定的部门,在自己的章节中有广泛的讨论,以及自1945年以来国家安全状态的兴起历史。…