Automatic Merging of Scopus and Web of Science Data for Simplified and Effective Bibliometric Analysis

Q1 Decision Sciences Annals of Data Science Pub Date : 2022-08-07 DOI:10.1007/s40745-022-00438-0
HimaJyothi Kasaraneni, Salini Rosaline
{"title":"Automatic Merging of Scopus and Web of Science Data for Simplified and Effective Bibliometric Analysis","authors":"HimaJyothi Kasaraneni,&nbsp;Salini Rosaline","doi":"10.1007/s40745-022-00438-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The desideratum of organizing and synthesizing the rising corpus of publications has prompted an escalation in bibliometric studies. Bibliometric analysis is an essential statistical tool that ascertains critical information for identifying research prospects for researchers. Besides, it acts as evidence to support scientific findings. Researchers primarily use either Scopus or Web of Science (WoS) databases for conducting bibliometric analysis. The individual usage of these databases in the bibliometric analysis does not achieve the desired outcome, which requires the merging of these two databases. There are several manual processes defined in the literature for merging Scopus and WoS data. However, all these manual procedures consume more time and may lead to an inaccurate merging of the databases, as they often involve human errors due to difficulty in data scrutinization. Hence, to avoid the manual process, this paper proposes an automatic process for merging Scopus and WoS data. To understand the importance of the proposed process, a small (40 records) and large (2344 records) dataset cases are considered on which both the manual and automatic processes are implemented. From the simulation results, it is observed that the proposed process consumed 0.4497659 s on small dataset and 1.715981 s on large dataset for merging process. Thus, it can be said that the proposed automatic merging process is an effective and time-saving approach that significantly reduces human effort and the risk of committing an error. The outcome of this process is a merged dataset that includes unique data of both Scopus and WoS databases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36280,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Data Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40745-022-00438-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The desideratum of organizing and synthesizing the rising corpus of publications has prompted an escalation in bibliometric studies. Bibliometric analysis is an essential statistical tool that ascertains critical information for identifying research prospects for researchers. Besides, it acts as evidence to support scientific findings. Researchers primarily use either Scopus or Web of Science (WoS) databases for conducting bibliometric analysis. The individual usage of these databases in the bibliometric analysis does not achieve the desired outcome, which requires the merging of these two databases. There are several manual processes defined in the literature for merging Scopus and WoS data. However, all these manual procedures consume more time and may lead to an inaccurate merging of the databases, as they often involve human errors due to difficulty in data scrutinization. Hence, to avoid the manual process, this paper proposes an automatic process for merging Scopus and WoS data. To understand the importance of the proposed process, a small (40 records) and large (2344 records) dataset cases are considered on which both the manual and automatic processes are implemented. From the simulation results, it is observed that the proposed process consumed 0.4497659 s on small dataset and 1.715981 s on large dataset for merging process. Thus, it can be said that the proposed automatic merging process is an effective and time-saving approach that significantly reduces human effort and the risk of committing an error. The outcome of this process is a merged dataset that includes unique data of both Scopus and WoS databases.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scopus与Web of Science数据的自动合并,简化有效的文献计量分析
对不断增加的出版物进行整理和归纳的需求促使文献计量学研究不断升级。文献计量分析是一种重要的统计工具,可为研究人员确定研究前景提供关键信息。此外,它还是支持科学发现的证据。研究人员主要使用 Scopus 或 Web of Science (WoS) 数据库进行文献计量分析。在文献计量分析中单独使用这两个数据库并不能达到预期效果,因此需要将这两个数据库合并。文献中定义了几种合并 Scopus 和 WoS 数据的手工流程。然而,所有这些手工流程都会耗费更多时间,并可能导致数据库合并不准确,因为这些流程往往会因数据审查困难而出现人为错误。因此,为了避免人工操作,本文提出了一种合并 Scopus 和 WoS 数据的自动流程。为了了解所建议流程的重要性,本文考虑了一个小型(40 条记录)和一个大型(2344 条记录)数据集的情况,并在这两个数据集上同时实施了人工流程和自动流程。从模拟结果中可以看出,在小数据集和大数据集上,建议的合并流程分别耗时 0.4497659 秒和 1.715981 秒。因此,可以说所提出的自动合并流程是一种有效、省时的方法,大大减少了人力和出错的风险。合并后的数据集包含 Scopus 和 WoS 数据库的唯一数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Data Science
Annals of Data Science Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Annals of Data Science (ADS) publishes cutting-edge research findings, experimental results and case studies of data science. Although Data Science is regarded as an interdisciplinary field of using mathematics, statistics, databases, data mining, high-performance computing, knowledge management and virtualization to discover knowledge from Big Data, it should have its own scientific contents, such as axioms, laws and rules, which are fundamentally important for experts in different fields to explore their own interests from Big Data. ADS encourages contributors to address such challenging problems at this exchange platform. At present, how to discover knowledge from heterogeneous data under Big Data environment needs to be addressed.     ADS is a series of volumes edited by either the editorial office or guest editors. Guest editors will be responsible for call-for-papers and the review process for high-quality contributions in their volumes.
期刊最新文献
Non-negative Sparse Matrix Factorization for Soft Clustering of Territory Risk Analysis Kernel Method for Estimating Matusita Overlapping Coefficient Using Numerical Approximations Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Generalized Inflated Power Series Distributions Farm-Level Smart Crop Recommendation Framework Using Machine Learning Reaction Function for Financial Market Reacting to Events or Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1