Performativity, managerial professionalism and the purpose of professional development: a South African case study

IF 2.8 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Education Policy Pub Date : 2022-08-15 DOI:10.1080/02680939.2022.2110946
C. Bertram, N. Mxenge
{"title":"Performativity, managerial professionalism and the purpose of professional development: a South African case study","authors":"C. Bertram, N. Mxenge","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2022.2110946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Early post-apartheid policies envisaged a South African teacher who had autonomy to make professional judgements based on their school context and learners’ needs. However, over the last decade, the state has increasingly monitored learner achievement and teachers’ work. In this paper, we show how the professional development activities provided by the state for high school Life Sciences teachers focus primarily on measuring learner achievement and thus reflect organisational professionalism and managerial discourses which challenge the early post-apartheid vision of democratic professionalism. We present a case study of a cluster of Life Sciences teachers, generating data from interviews with eleven high school teachers and from observation of six professional development meetings. The findings show that the two main purposes of the activities in the cluster meetings are the improvement of learner results and the monitoring teachers’ curriculum coverage and assessment practices. We argue that the discourse of performativity and managerial professionalism narrows the purpose of schooling, influences the nature of state-initiated professional development opportunities and also informs the way in which the state and teachers view their work. This contradicts the initial vision of the democratic state and provides insight into how neoliberal discourses have influenced education in a post-colonial country.","PeriodicalId":51404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education Policy","volume":"38 1","pages":"607 - 624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2022.2110946","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Early post-apartheid policies envisaged a South African teacher who had autonomy to make professional judgements based on their school context and learners’ needs. However, over the last decade, the state has increasingly monitored learner achievement and teachers’ work. In this paper, we show how the professional development activities provided by the state for high school Life Sciences teachers focus primarily on measuring learner achievement and thus reflect organisational professionalism and managerial discourses which challenge the early post-apartheid vision of democratic professionalism. We present a case study of a cluster of Life Sciences teachers, generating data from interviews with eleven high school teachers and from observation of six professional development meetings. The findings show that the two main purposes of the activities in the cluster meetings are the improvement of learner results and the monitoring teachers’ curriculum coverage and assessment practices. We argue that the discourse of performativity and managerial professionalism narrows the purpose of schooling, influences the nature of state-initiated professional development opportunities and also informs the way in which the state and teachers view their work. This contradicts the initial vision of the democratic state and provides insight into how neoliberal discourses have influenced education in a post-colonial country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绩效、管理专业和专业发展的目的:一个南非的案例研究
早期后种族隔离政策设想南非教师拥有根据学校环境和学生需求做出专业判断的自主权。然而,在过去的十年里,国家越来越多地监控学习者的成就和教师的工作。在本文中,我们展示了国家为高中生命科学教师提供的专业发展活动如何主要关注于衡量学习者的成就,从而反映了组织专业主义和管理话语,这些话语挑战了早期后种族隔离时代对民主专业主义的看法。我们提出了一组生命科学教师的案例研究,通过对11位高中教师的访谈和对6次专业发展会议的观察得出数据。研究结果表明,小组会议活动的两个主要目的是提高学习者的成绩和监督教师的课程覆盖和评估实践。我们认为,表演性和管理专业主义的话语缩小了学校教育的目的,影响了国家发起的专业发展机会的性质,也影响了国家和教师看待他们工作的方式。这与民主国家的最初愿景相矛盾,并为新自由主义话语如何影响后殖民国家的教育提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education Policy
Journal of Education Policy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education Policy publishes original, critically and theoretically informed research that discusses, analyses and debates policymaking, policy implementation and the impact of policy at all levels and in all facets of formal and informal education. The journal is interested in analysis and theorisation of policy that is transposable, that has generic interest and relevance - national policy case studies would need to be conceptually and/or methodologically generalisable. The journal also publishes work that presents new methods of research and research studies that are experimental and innovative. The journal offers a forum for theoretical debate, as well as historical, philosophical and comparative studies, across different countries, contexts and levels of education. A valuable resource for academics, researchers, educators and policy makers, Journal of Education Policy provides rigorous and original insights into educational policy development, implications and global impact.
期刊最新文献
The ‘performative’ university: theoretical and personal reflections ‘Embers, and fragments’: social haunting in youth work, impact measurement and policy networks Disentangling the binomial change/inertia to the Chilean educational policy in the post-dictatorship era (1990–2022). A normative policy instrument perspective Resisting regulation: revealing orders of worth behind the debate over private education regulation in Peru Comparing two transfer spaces over time and against a global script: the case of school-autonomy-with-accountability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1