{"title":"Another look at the interaction between verbs and constructions","authors":"Seizi Iwata","doi":"10.1075/cf.21006.iwa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Despite the wealth of literature on English resultatives, there still remain a number of issues that have not been\n squarely addressed. This paper addresses two of them through a case study of resultatives based on wipe. First,\n while the existence of resultatives with objects not selected by verbs is well-known in the literature (e.g., wipe the\n crumbs off the table/*wipe the crumbs), few studies have addressed the issue of exactly which entities may appear as\n non-selected objects. Second, there are resultatives whose form is to be analyzed as a mixture of the verb’s lexically-specified\n syntactic frame and the syntactic frame of resultatives (e.g. wipe the blade clean on his skin coat), but such\n resultatives have been neglected in previous studies.\n In order to find an answer to the first issue, this paper adopts a force-recipient account, according to which the\n post-verbal NP of a resultative is a force-recipient (cf. Croft 1990, 1991, 1998, 2012). It is shown that non-selected objects like crumbs are indeed force-recipients in\n a conceptual scene. As for the second issue, such resultatives can be accommodated by means of a constructional analysis which\n holds that verbs contribute the semantics of the resulting expression, and that argument structure constructions simply enable the\n verb meaning to take its form. Together, these findings indicate that verbs play a far more important role than argument structure\n constructions in effecting the syntax and semantics of the resulting expression.","PeriodicalId":42321,"journal":{"name":"Constructions and Frames","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constructions and Frames","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.21006.iwa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite the wealth of literature on English resultatives, there still remain a number of issues that have not been
squarely addressed. This paper addresses two of them through a case study of resultatives based on wipe. First,
while the existence of resultatives with objects not selected by verbs is well-known in the literature (e.g., wipe the
crumbs off the table/*wipe the crumbs), few studies have addressed the issue of exactly which entities may appear as
non-selected objects. Second, there are resultatives whose form is to be analyzed as a mixture of the verb’s lexically-specified
syntactic frame and the syntactic frame of resultatives (e.g. wipe the blade clean on his skin coat), but such
resultatives have been neglected in previous studies.
In order to find an answer to the first issue, this paper adopts a force-recipient account, according to which the
post-verbal NP of a resultative is a force-recipient (cf. Croft 1990, 1991, 1998, 2012). It is shown that non-selected objects like crumbs are indeed force-recipients in
a conceptual scene. As for the second issue, such resultatives can be accommodated by means of a constructional analysis which
holds that verbs contribute the semantics of the resulting expression, and that argument structure constructions simply enable the
verb meaning to take its form. Together, these findings indicate that verbs play a far more important role than argument structure
constructions in effecting the syntax and semantics of the resulting expression.
尽管关于英语结果体的文献非常丰富,但仍有许多问题没有得到明确的解决。本文通过一个基于wipe的结果式的案例研究来解决其中的两个问题。首先,虽然在文献中,结果语与非动词选择对象的存在是众所周知的(例如,wipe the crumbs off the table/*wipe the crumbs),但很少有研究解决哪些实体可能作为非选择对象出现的问题。第二,有一种结果式,其形式是动词词汇规定的句法框架和结果式句法框架(如wipe the blade clean on his skin coat)的混合,但这种结果式在以往的研究中被忽略了。为了找到第一个问题的答案,本文采用了力接受者解释,根据该解释,结果句的动后NP是力接受者(cf. Croft 1990, 1991, 1998, 2012)。结果表明,在概念场景中,像面包屑这样的非选择对象确实是力的接受者。至于第二个问题,这样的结果式可以通过结构分析来解决,结构分析认为动词提供了结果表达的语义,而论点结构结构只是使动词的意义具有其形式。综上所述,这些发现表明,在影响最终表达的语法和语义方面,动词比论点结构结构起着更重要的作用。