Criminal responsibility for medical injury: A helpful or harmful mechanism for patient safety?

Q2 Social Sciences Medical Law International Pub Date : 2021-11-30 DOI:10.1177/09685332211064806
M. Tumelty
{"title":"Criminal responsibility for medical injury: A helpful or harmful mechanism for patient safety?","authors":"M. Tumelty","doi":"10.1177/09685332211064806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue of Medical Law International stems from an interdisciplinary workshop which took place in November 2019, titled ‘Criminal responsibility for medical error – a helpful or harmful mechanism for delivering patient safety’. The event was funded by the Irish Research Council’s New Foundations Scheme, and held at the School of Law, University College Cork, to address growing concern around the use of the criminal law to regulate healthcare practices and to consider the implications, if any, for patient safety. The papers included in this special issue are revised versions of selected papers presented at this workshop. As editor of this issue, I am grateful to all those who participated in the workshop and to the Irish Research Council, for making this knowledge exchange possible. I would also like to sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers of the papers included in this special issue. This special issue, Criminal responsibility for medical injury: a helpful or harmful mechanism for patient safety? seeks to investigate some of the core challenges posed by the increasing interactions of the criminal law with the practice of medicine. The rise in criminal investigations and prosecutions of medical practitioners arguably reflects changing societal attitudes to the profession,1 and while the desire for accountability is understandable and important, it is argued that criminal sanction is only ‘helpful’ where it is morally appropriate and improves patient safety. It is positively harmful where it does little to improve patient safety and to ensure the delivery of safe healthcare, but rather is experienced as punitive in nature and criminalises physicians for incidents of human error.2 The authors of this collection of papers, Ash Samanta and Jo Samanta,","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"21 1","pages":"289 - 292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Law International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332211064806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special issue of Medical Law International stems from an interdisciplinary workshop which took place in November 2019, titled ‘Criminal responsibility for medical error – a helpful or harmful mechanism for delivering patient safety’. The event was funded by the Irish Research Council’s New Foundations Scheme, and held at the School of Law, University College Cork, to address growing concern around the use of the criminal law to regulate healthcare practices and to consider the implications, if any, for patient safety. The papers included in this special issue are revised versions of selected papers presented at this workshop. As editor of this issue, I am grateful to all those who participated in the workshop and to the Irish Research Council, for making this knowledge exchange possible. I would also like to sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers of the papers included in this special issue. This special issue, Criminal responsibility for medical injury: a helpful or harmful mechanism for patient safety? seeks to investigate some of the core challenges posed by the increasing interactions of the criminal law with the practice of medicine. The rise in criminal investigations and prosecutions of medical practitioners arguably reflects changing societal attitudes to the profession,1 and while the desire for accountability is understandable and important, it is argued that criminal sanction is only ‘helpful’ where it is morally appropriate and improves patient safety. It is positively harmful where it does little to improve patient safety and to ensure the delivery of safe healthcare, but rather is experienced as punitive in nature and criminalises physicians for incidents of human error.2 The authors of this collection of papers, Ash Samanta and Jo Samanta,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗伤害的刑事责任:对患者安全有益还是有害的机制?
这期《国际医学法》特刊源于2019年11月举行的一个跨学科研讨会,题为“医疗失误的刑事责任——一种有益或有害的患者安全机制”。该活动由爱尔兰研究委员会的新基金会计划资助,在科克大学法学院举行,旨在解决人们对利用刑法规范医疗实践日益增长的担忧,并考虑对患者安全的影响(如果有的话)。本特刊中的论文是本次研讨会上所选论文的修订版。作为本期的编辑,我感谢所有参加研讨会的人和爱尔兰研究委员会,感谢他们使这次知识交流成为可能。我还要衷心感谢本期特刊所载论文的匿名审稿人。本期特刊《医疗伤害的刑事责任:对患者安全有益还是有害的机制?试图调查刑法与医学实践日益互动所带来的一些核心挑战。对医生的刑事调查和起诉的增加可以说反映了社会对这一职业态度的变化,1尽管追究责任的愿望是可以理解和重要的,但有人认为,刑事制裁只有在道德上合适并提高患者安全的情况下才是“有帮助的”。它对改善患者安全和确保提供安全的医疗保健几乎没有作用,而是具有惩罚性,并将医生因人为失误而定为犯罪,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Law International
Medical Law International Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The scope includes: Clinical Negligence. Health Matters Affecting Civil Liberties. Forensic Medicine. Determination of Death. Organ and Tissue Transplantation. End of Life Decisions. Legal and Ethical Issues in Medical Treatment. Confidentiality. Access to Medical Records. Medical Complaints Procedures. Professional Discipline. Employment Law and Legal Issues within NHS. Resource Allocation in Health Care. Mental Health Law. Misuse of Drugs. Legal and Ethical Issues concerning Human Reproduction. Therapeutic Products. Medical Research. Cloning. Gene Therapy. Genetic Testing and Screening. And Related Topics.
期刊最新文献
Challenges for the legislation enabling egg donation in Switzerland. Book review: Not What the Bus Promised: Health Governance After Brexit Accessing third-party research databases for criminal investigations: Enhancing legal protections and safeguarding public interests Book review: The Disability Bioethics Reader Book review: The Right to Be Protected From Committing Suicide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1