The Implementation of Active Transportation Policies at the Local Level: Findings From a North Carolina Survey

IF 1 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Public Works Management & Policy Pub Date : 2022-05-14 DOI:10.1177/1087724X221088835
Suzanne M. Leland, Christine M. Danis, Sara J. Smith, Robert H. W. Boyer
{"title":"The Implementation of Active Transportation Policies at the Local Level: Findings From a North Carolina Survey","authors":"Suzanne M. Leland, Christine M. Danis, Sara J. Smith, Robert H. W. Boyer","doi":"10.1177/1087724X221088835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current intergovernmental environment to improve transportation infrastructure, states typically set walking and biking policy. However, local governments, which control budget priorities and land-use policy, also need to support those policies in order to provide for successful implementation. Unfortunately, little is known about state and local priorities when it comes to active transportation. Therefore, the following study examines active transportation policies in North Carolina from the local government perspective. This study asks those responsible for implementing transportation policy at the local level the following questions: Does support for improved infrastructure vary based by land use type, population density, and organizational structure? From the local government perspective is walking and biking safe or unsafe in their jurisdiction?What if any barriers exist to providing improved infrastructure that promotes safety? The responses serve as local government perspectives about what conditions may inform the nature and extent of bicycle and pedestrian active transportation projects in","PeriodicalId":45483,"journal":{"name":"Public Works Management & Policy","volume":"27 1","pages":"315 - 332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Works Management & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X221088835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the current intergovernmental environment to improve transportation infrastructure, states typically set walking and biking policy. However, local governments, which control budget priorities and land-use policy, also need to support those policies in order to provide for successful implementation. Unfortunately, little is known about state and local priorities when it comes to active transportation. Therefore, the following study examines active transportation policies in North Carolina from the local government perspective. This study asks those responsible for implementing transportation policy at the local level the following questions: Does support for improved infrastructure vary based by land use type, population density, and organizational structure? From the local government perspective is walking and biking safe or unsafe in their jurisdiction?What if any barriers exist to providing improved infrastructure that promotes safety? The responses serve as local government perspectives about what conditions may inform the nature and extent of bicycle and pedestrian active transportation projects in
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极交通政策在地方层面的实施:来自北卡罗莱纳调查的结果
在当前政府间改善交通基础设施的环境中,各州通常会制定步行和骑自行车的政策。然而,控制预算优先事项和土地使用政策的地方政府也需要支持这些政策,以便为成功实施提供条件。不幸的是,当涉及到主动交通时,人们对州和地方的优先事项知之甚少。因此,下面的研究从地方政府的角度考察了北卡罗来纳州的积极交通政策。本研究向负责在地方层面实施交通政策的人提出以下问题:对改善基础设施的支持是否因土地利用类型、人口密度和组织结构而异?从当地政府的角度来看,在他们的管辖范围内,步行和骑自行车是安全的还是不安全的?如果在提供改善的基础设施以促进安全方面存在障碍怎么办?这些回应可以作为地方政府的观点,了解哪些条件可能会影响自行车和行人主动交通项目的性质和范围
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Works Management & Policy
Public Works Management & Policy PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY: RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN TRANSPORTATION, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND THE ENVIRONMENT is a peer-reviewed journal for academics and practitioners in public works and the public and private infrastructure industries. This journal addresses the planning, financing, development, and operations of civil infrastructure systems at all levels of society— from federal policy to the demand for, and delivery of, state and local public works services. PWMP solicits manuscripts that convey research results, evaluate management innovations, suggest methods of analysis and evaluation, and examine policy issues.
期刊最新文献
Politics, Policy, and Pain: Paying for Infrastructure in Pressing Times Risky Decisions Over Troubled Waters: Public Works Directors’ Sea Level Rise Risk Attitudes Changing Tides and Changing Winds: A Time to Change Gears Persisting Cost Overruns in Public Infrastructure Projects: Lessons From the Belgian Case The Impact of Leadership Behaviour on Management Effectiveness in Public Construction Project Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1