Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India Consensus Guidelines on Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: Part II (Technical Aspects)

IF 0.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Digestive Endoscopy Pub Date : 2023-04-24 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1768043
J. Samanta, P. Udawat, S. Chowdhary, D. Gunjan, P. Rai, V. Bhatia, Vikas Singla, Saurabh S. Mukewar, Nilay Mehta, C. Achanta, A. Dalal, M. Sahu, A. Balekuduru, Abhijith Bale, Jahangir Basha, M. Philip, S. Rana, R. Puri, S. Lakhtakia, V. Dhir
{"title":"Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India Consensus Guidelines on Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: Part II (Technical Aspects)","authors":"J. Samanta, P. Udawat, S. Chowdhary, D. Gunjan, P. Rai, V. Bhatia, Vikas Singla, Saurabh S. Mukewar, Nilay Mehta, C. Achanta, A. Dalal, M. Sahu, A. Balekuduru, Abhijith Bale, Jahangir Basha, M. Philip, S. Rana, R. Puri, S. Lakhtakia, V. Dhir","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Endoscopic management of bile duct obstruction is a key aspect in gastroenterology practice and has evolved since the first description of biliary cannulation by McCune et al in 1968. Over many decades, the techniques and accessories have been refined, and currently, the first-line management for extrahepatic biliary obstruction is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, even in expert hands, the success rate of ERCP reaches up to 95%. In almost 4 to 16% cases, failure to cannulate the bile duct may necessitate other alternatives such as surgical bypass or, more commonly, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). While surgery is associated with high morbidity and mortality, PTBD has a very high reintervention and complication rate (∼80%) and poor quality of life. Almost parallelly, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has come a long way from a mere diagnostic tool to a substantial therapeutic option in various pancreaticobiliary diseases. Biliary drainage using EUS-guidance (EUS-BD) has gained momentum since the first report published by Giovannini et al in 2001. The concept of accessing the bile duct through a different route than the papilla, circumventing the shortcomings of PTBD, and sometimes bypassing the actual obstruction have enthused a lot of interest in this novel strategy. The three key methods of EUS-BD entail transluminal, antegrade, and rendezvous approach. Over the past decade, with growing experience, EUS-BD has been found to be equivalent to ERCP or PTBD for malignant obstruction with better success rates. EUS-BD, however, is not devoid of adverse events and can carry fatal adverse events. However, neither the technique of EUS-BD nor the accessories and stents for EUS-BD have been standardized. Additionally, different countries and regions have different availability of the accessories, making generalizability a difficult task. Thus, technical aspects of this evolving therapy need to be outlined. For these reasons, Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India (SGEI) deemed it appropriate to develop technical consensus statements for performing safe and successful EUS-BD.","PeriodicalId":43098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"14 1","pages":"074 - 087"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Endoscopic management of bile duct obstruction is a key aspect in gastroenterology practice and has evolved since the first description of biliary cannulation by McCune et al in 1968. Over many decades, the techniques and accessories have been refined, and currently, the first-line management for extrahepatic biliary obstruction is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, even in expert hands, the success rate of ERCP reaches up to 95%. In almost 4 to 16% cases, failure to cannulate the bile duct may necessitate other alternatives such as surgical bypass or, more commonly, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). While surgery is associated with high morbidity and mortality, PTBD has a very high reintervention and complication rate (∼80%) and poor quality of life. Almost parallelly, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has come a long way from a mere diagnostic tool to a substantial therapeutic option in various pancreaticobiliary diseases. Biliary drainage using EUS-guidance (EUS-BD) has gained momentum since the first report published by Giovannini et al in 2001. The concept of accessing the bile duct through a different route than the papilla, circumventing the shortcomings of PTBD, and sometimes bypassing the actual obstruction have enthused a lot of interest in this novel strategy. The three key methods of EUS-BD entail transluminal, antegrade, and rendezvous approach. Over the past decade, with growing experience, EUS-BD has been found to be equivalent to ERCP or PTBD for malignant obstruction with better success rates. EUS-BD, however, is not devoid of adverse events and can carry fatal adverse events. However, neither the technique of EUS-BD nor the accessories and stents for EUS-BD have been standardized. Additionally, different countries and regions have different availability of the accessories, making generalizability a difficult task. Thus, technical aspects of this evolving therapy need to be outlined. For these reasons, Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India (SGEI) deemed it appropriate to develop technical consensus statements for performing safe and successful EUS-BD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度胃肠内镜学会超声内镜引导胆道引流共识指南:第二部分(技术方面)
摘要胆管梗阻的内窥镜治疗是胃肠病实践中的一个关键方面,自1968年McCune等人首次描述胆道插管以来,该方法一直在发展。几十年来,技术和附件已经得到了改进,目前,肝外胆管梗阻的一线治疗是内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)。然而,即使在专家手中,ERCP的成功率也高达95%。在几乎4%至16%的病例中,未能插管胆管可能需要其他替代方案,如手术旁路或更常见的经皮肝穿刺胆道引流(PTBD)。虽然手术与高发病率和死亡率有关,但PTBD的再干预和并发症发生率非常高(~80%),生活质量较差。几乎同时,内镜超声(EUS)已经从一种简单的诊断工具发展成为各种胰胆管疾病的重要治疗选择。自Giovannini等人于2001年发表第一份报告以来,使用EUS指导的胆道引流(EUS-BD)已经获得了发展势头。通过与乳头不同的途径进入胆管,绕过PTBD的缺点,有时绕过实际的梗阻,这一概念激发了人们对这种新策略的兴趣。EUS-BD的三种关键方法包括经腔、顺行和交会进近。在过去的十年里,随着经验的积累,EUS-BD在治疗恶性梗阻方面与ERCP或PTBD相当,成功率更高。然而,EUS-BD并非没有不良事件,并且可能携带致命的不良事件。然而,无论是EUS-BD的技术,还是EUS-BD配件和支架,都没有标准化。此外,不同的国家和地区有不同的配件供应,这使得推广成为一项困难的任务。因此,需要概述这种不断发展的疗法的技术方面。出于这些原因,印度胃肠道内窥镜学会(SGEI)认为制定安全成功的EUS-BD的技术共识声明是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
Journal of Digestive Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
28.60%
发文量
35
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Digestive Endoscopy (JDE) is the official publication of the Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India that has over 1500 members. The society comprises of several key clinicians in this field from different parts of the country and has key international speakers in its advisory board. JDE is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, print and online journal publishing quarterly. It focuses on original investigations, reviews, case reports and clinical images as well as key investigations including but not limited to cholangiopancreatography, fluoroscopy, capsule endoscopy etc.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Polyp Detection and Characterization Accidental Ingestion of Live Ants Linear Endoscopic Ultrasound Examination of the Biliary System and Its Clinical Applications Pill Esophagitis: Clinical and Endoscopic Profile Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopic Polyp Detection and Characterization: Merging Computer Technology and Endoscopic Skill for Better Patient Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1